Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 1. cost minimization

Energy and Fuels

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 5121-5133

  Zamboni, Andrea ^a   Shah, Nilay ^b   Bezzo, Fabrizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT; CORN-BASED ETHANOL; COST MINIMIZATION; DESIGN TASKS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; FINANCIAL MODELS; FOSSIL SOURCES; KEY ISSUES; LOGISTICS DISTRIBUTION; MAKING PROCESS; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAM; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; PLANT CAPACITIES; PRODUCTION SITES; SCALE FACTOR; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; STATIC MODEL; STRATEGIC DESIGN; STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE; SUPPLY NETWORKS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; AUTOMOTIVE FUELS; BIOETHANOL; BIOMASS; CULTIVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ETHANOL; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; LEAKAGE (FLUID); OPERATING COSTS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS;

PUBLIC KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY;

EID: 70350452579     PISSN: 08870624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ef900456w     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Zamboni, A.; Bezzo, F.; Shah, N. Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 2. Multi-objective environmental optimization. Energy Fuels 2009, DOI: 10.1021/ef9004779.
2. Akinci, B.; Kassebaum, P. G.; Fitch, J. V.; Thompson, R. W. The role of bio-fuels in satisfying US transportation fuel demands. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 3485-3491.
3. Energy Information Administration. www.eia.doe.gov.
4. Service, R. F. Toward a hydrogen economy: The carbon conundrum. Science 2004, 305, 962-963.
5. European Commission (EC). Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels for transport. Official Journal of the European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
6. European Commission (EC). Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply. Communication from the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
7. EuropeanCommission (EC). The share of renewable energy in the UE. Communication from the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
8. European Commission (EC). Presidency Conclusions OR.EN. 7224/07 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium, 2007.
9. Cardona, C. A.; Sánchez, O. J. Fuel ethanol production: Process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2415-2457.
10. Granda, C. B.; Zhu, L.; Holtzapple, M. T. Sustainable liquid biofuels and their environmental impact. Environ. Prog. 2007, 26, 233-250.
11. Romero Hernández, O.; Salas-Porras, E. D.; Rode, M. I. Panorama of the Social, Environmental, And Economic Conditions of Corn Ethanol in Mexico; Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM): Mexico City, Mexico, 2008.
12. Bernard, F.; Prieur, A. Biofuel market and carbon modeling to analyze French biofuel policy. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 5991-6002
13. Farrell, A. E.; Plevin, R. J.; Turner, T. T.; Jones, A. D.; O'Hare, M.; Kammen, D. M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 2006, 311, 506-508.
14. Beamon, B. Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 1998, 55, 281-294.
15. Kallrath, J. Mixed integer optimisation in the chemical process industry: Experience, potential and future perspectives. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2000, 78, 809-822.
16. Dunnett, A.; Adjiman, C. S.; Shah, N. A spatially explicit wholesystem model of the lignocellulosic bioethanol supply chain: An assessment of decentralised processing potential. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2008, 1, 13.
17. Dunnett, A.; Adjiman, C. S.; Shah, N. Biomass to heat supply chains: Applications of process optimization. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2007, 85, 419-429.
18. Bruglieri, M.; Liberti, L. Optimal running and planning of a biomass-based energy production process. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 2430-2438.
19. Yu, Y.; Bartle, J.; Li, C.; Wu, H. Mallee biomass as a key bioenergy source in Western Australia: Importance of biomass supply chain. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 3290-3299.
20. Morrow, W. R.; Griffin, W. M.; Matthews, H. S. Modeling switchgrass derived cellulosic ethanol distribution in the united states. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 2877-2886.
21. Franceschin, G.; Zamboni, A.; Bezzo, F.; Bertucco, A. Ethanol from corn: A technical and economical assessment based on different scenarios. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2008, 86, 488-498.
22. Karuppiah, R.; Peschel, A.; Grossmann, I. E.; Martín, M.; Martinson, W.; Zullo, L. Energy optimization for the design of cornbased ethanol plants. AIChE J. 2008, 54, 1499-1525.
23. Yu, S.; Tao, J. Life cycle simulation-based economic and risk assessment of biomass-based fuel ethanol (BFE) projects in different feedstock planting areas. Energy 2008, 33, 375-384.
24. Kim, S.; Dale, B. E. Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol derived from corn grain via dry milling. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 5250-5260.
25. Sahinidis, N. V.; Grossmann, I. E.; Fornari, R. E.; Chatrathi, M. Optimization model for long range planning in the chemical industry. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1989, 13, 1049-1063.
26. Tsiakis, P.; Shah, N.; Pantelides, C. C. Design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under demand uncertainty. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40 (16), 3585-3604.
27. Hugo, A.; Pistikopoulos, E. N. Environmentally conscious longrange planning and design of supply chain networks. J. Cleaner Prod. 2005, 13, 1471-1491.
28. Almansoori, A.; Shah, N. Design and operation of a future hydrogen supply chain: Snapshot model. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2005, 84, 423-438.
29. Petrou, E. C.; Pappis, C. P. Biofuels: A survey on pros and cons. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1055-1066.
30. Gallagher, P. W.; Brubaker, H.; Shapouri, H. Plant size: Capital cost relationships in the dry mill ethanol industry. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 28, 565-571.
31. Istituto Nazionale Distribuzione e Servizi (INDIS). La Filiera dei Carburanti per Autotrazione;Un'Analisi; INDIS: Roma, Italy, 2007.
32. Kong, M. T. Downstream oil products supply chain optimization. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London, U.K., 2002.
33. MSE database. dgerm.sviluppoeconomico.gov.it.
34. ISTAT database. www.istat.it.
35. APAT database. www.clc2000.sinanet.apat.it.
36. CRPV database. www.crpv.it.
37. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). USDA, Feed Grains Baseline; USDA: Washington, D.C., 2005.
38. Buxton, L. All aboard. Biofuel Int. 2008, 1.
39. Peters, M. S.; Timmerhaus, K. D.; West, R. E. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2003.
40. Kwiatkowski, J. R.; McAloon, A. J.; Taylor, F.; Johnston, D. B. Modeling the process and costs of the production of fuel ethanol by the corn dry-grind process. Ind. Crops Prod. 2006, 23, 288-296.
41. Rosenthal, R. E. GAMS-A Users' Guide (version 22.5). GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, D.C., 2006.
42. Hammerschlag, R. Ethanol's energy return on investment: A survey of the literature 1990-present. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 1744-1750.
43. Solomon, B. D.; Barnes, J. R.; Halvorsen, K. E. Grain and cellulosic ethanol: History, economics, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31, 416-425.
44. Energy Information Administration. Weekly Petrouleum Status Report. www.eia.doe.gov/oil-gas/petroleum/data-publications/weekly-petroleum-status- report/wpsr.html.