Translating Clinical Informatics Interventions into Routine Clinical Care: How Can the RE-AIM Framework Help?

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 889-897

  Bakken, Suzanne ^a,b   Ruland, Cornelia M ^b,c  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b National University Hospital ^*  (United States)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70350438633     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3085     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Zerhouni E. The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, 2003. http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/ Accessed Jan 5, 2008
2. Zerhouni E. The NIH roadmap. Science 302 5642 (2003) 63-72
3. Sung N.S., Crowley Jr. W.F., Genel M., et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. J Am Med Assoc 289 10 (2003) 1278-1287
4. Westfall J.M., Mold J., and Fagnan L. Practice-based research-"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. J Am Med Assoc 297 4 (2007) 403-406
5. Woolf S.H. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. J Am Med Assoc 299 2 (2008) 211-213
6. Clinical and Translational Science Awards, 2008. http://www.ctsaweb.org/ Accessed Aug 30, 2008
7. Bakken S., Lantigua R.A., Busacca L., and Bigger J.T. Perceived barriers, enablers, and incentives for research among current and potential members of an urban PBRN: A mixed methods analysis. J Am Board Fam Med 22 (2009) 436-445
8. Demakis J.G., McQueen L., Kizer K.W., and Feussner J.R. Quality enhancement research initiative (Queri): A collaboration between research and clinical practice. Med Care 38 6 (2000) I17-I25 (Suppl 1)
9. McQueen L., Mittman B.S., and Demakis J.G. Overview of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) quality enhancement research initiative (Queri). J Am Med Inform Assoc 11 5 (2004) 339-343
10. Glasgow R.E., McKay H.G., Piette J.D., and Reynolds K.D. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?. Patient Educ Couns 44 2 (2001) 119-127
11. Glasgow R.E., Lichtenstein E., and Marcus A.C. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice?. Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Pub Health 93 8 (2003) 1261-1267
12. Glasgow R.E., Green L.W., Klesges L.M., et al. External validity: We need to do more. Ann Behav Med 31 2 (2006) 105-108
13. Glasgow R.E., Klesges L.M., Dzewaltowski D.A., Estabrooks P.A., and Vogt T.M. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: Using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res 21 5 (2006) 688-694
14. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) and the translation of research into practice, 2003. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-04-041.html Accessed Nov 22, 2008
15. Glasgow R.E., Davidson K.W., Dobkin P.L., Ockene J., and Spring B. Practical behavioral trials to advance evidence-based behavioral medicine. Ann Behav Med 31 1 (2006) 5-13
16. McGlynn E.A., Asch S.M., Adams J., et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348 26 (2003) 2635-2645
17. Glasziou P., Guyatt G.H., Dans A.L., et al. Applying the results of trials and systematic reviews to individual patients. ACP J Club 129 3 (1998) A15-A16
18. Walker J.S., and Bruns E.J. Building on practice-based evidence: Using expert perspectives to define the wraparound process. Psychiatr Serv 57 11 (2006) 1579-1585
19. Weisz J., and Kazdin A. Concluding thoughts: Present and future of evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. In: Kazdin A., Weisz J., et al. (Eds). Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents (2003), Guilford, New York
20. Hoagwood K., Burns B.J., Kiser L., Ringeisen H., and Schoenwald S.K. Evidence-based practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Psychiatr Serv 52 9 (2001) 1179-1189
21. Roy-Byrne P.P., Sherbourne C.D., Craske M.G., et al. Moving treatment research from clinical trials to the real world. Psychiatr Serv 54 3 (2003) 327-332
22. Green L.W., and Glasgow R.E. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval The Health Care Prof 29 1 (2006) 126-153
23. Stead W.W., Haynes R.B., Fuller S., et al. Designing medical informatics research and library-Resource projects to increase what is learned. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1 1 (1994) 28-33
24. Anderson J., Aydin C., and Jay S. Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
25. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13 3 (1989) 319-340
26. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations (1995), Free Press, New York
27. Ruland C. Integrating patient preferences for self-care capability in nursing care: Effects on nurses' care priorities and patient outcomes (1998), Case Western Reserve University, Doctoral Dissertation, Cleveland, Ohio
28. Sobo E.J., Bowman C., and Gifford A.L. Behind the scenes in health care improvement: The complex structures and emergent strategies of implementation science. Soc Sci Med 67 10 (2008) 1530-1540 Epub 2008 Aug 27
29. Chambers D.A. Advancing the science of implementation: A workshop summary. Adm Policy Ment Health 35 1-2 (2008) 3-10
30. Madon T., Hofman K.J., Kupfer L., and Glass R.I. Public health. Implementation science. Science 318 5857 (2007) 1728-1729
31. RE-AIM.org. http://www.re-aim.org Accessed Oct 4, 2008
32. Altman D.G. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. BMJ 313 7057 (1996) 570-571
33. Boutron I., Moher D., Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., and Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148 4 (2008) 295-309
34. Moher D., Schulz K.F., and Altman D.G. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357 9263 (2001) 1191-1194
35. Shcherbatykh I., Holbrook A., Thabane L., and Dolovich L. Methodologic issues in health informatics trials: The complexities of complex interventions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15 5 (2008) 575-580
36. Glasgow R.E., Vogt T.M., and Boles S.M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Pub Health 89 9 (1999) 1322-1327
37. Glasgow R.E. eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med 32 5 (2007) S119-S126 (Suppl 1)
38. Glasgow R.E., Nelson C.C., Strycker L.A., and King D.K. Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. Am J Prev Med 30 1 (2006) 67-73
39. Horn S.D., and Gassaway J. Practice-based evidence study design for comparative effectiveness research. Med Care 45 10 (2006) 50-57 (Suppl 2)
40. Pinto B.M., Friedman R., Marcus B.H., et al. Effects of a computer-based, telephone-counseling system on physical activity. Am J Prev Med 23 2 (2002) 113-120
41. Kukafka R., Johnson S.B., Linfante A., and Allegrante J.P. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: A systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. J Biomed Inform 36 3 (2003) 218-227
42. th edn (2005), McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA
43. Encyclopedia of public health. http://www.enotes.com/public-health-encyclopedia/ Accessed Nov 4, 2008
44. Holmes-Rovner M., Valade D., Orlowski C., et al. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: Barriers and opportunities. Health Expect 3 3 (2000) 182-191
45. Aronsky D., Chan K.J., and Haug P.J. Evaluation of a computerized diagnostic decision support system for patients with pneumonia: Study design considerations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8 5 (2001) 473-485
46. Ruland C., White T., Stevens M., Fanciullo G., and Khilani S. Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: Preliminary results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10 6 (2003) 573-579
47. Ruland C.M. Handheld technology to improve patient care: Evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9 2 (2002) 192-201
48. Ruland C. Decision support for patient preference-based care planning: Effects on nursing care and patient outcomes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6 4 (1999) 304-312
49. Ruland C., Roslien J., Bakken S., and Kristiansen J. Comparing tailored computerized symptom assessments to interviews and questionnaires. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2006) 1081
50. Ruland CM. Unpublished data.
51. Ruland C.M. Clinicians' perceived usefulness of a support system for patient-centered cancer care. Stud Health Technol Inform 124 (2006) 624-630
52. Tunis S.R., Stryer D.B., and Clancy C.M. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 290 12 (2003) 1624-1632
53. Bakken S., Currie L.M., Lee N.J., et al. Integrating evidence into clinical information systems for nursing decision support. Int J Med Inform 77 6 (2008) 413-420
54. Bakken S., Roberts W.D., Chen E., et al. PDA-based informatics strategies for tobacco use screening and smoking cessation management: A case study. Stud Health Technol Inform 129 2 (2007) 1447-1451
55. Lee N.J., Chen E., Mendonca E.A., Velez O., and Bakken S. Database design and implementation for a PDA-based decision support system for screening and tailored care planning. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2007) 1025
56. John R., Buschman P., Chaszar M., et al. Development and evaluation of a PDA-based decision support system for pediatric depression screening. Stud Health Technol Inform 129 2 (2007) 1382-1386