Application of boat-based laser scanning for river survey

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 34, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1831-1838

  Alho, P ^a   Kukko, A ^b   Hyyppa H ^c   Kaartinen, H ^b   Hyyppa J ^b   Jaakkola, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b FINNISH GEODETIC INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Laser scanning; LiDAR; Mobile mapping; River morphology; TLS

Indexed keywords

LASER SCANNING; LIDAR; MOBILE MAPPING; RIVER MORPHOLOGY; TLS;

BOATS; LASER APPLICATIONS; MAPPING; OPTICAL RADAR; RIVERS; SCANNING; SURVEYS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOPOGRAPHY;

SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 70350426482     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1879     Document Type: Letter

References (39)

1. Alho P, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J. 2009. Consequence of DTM precision for flood hazard mapping: a case study in SW Finland. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 6: 21-39.
2. Alsdorf DE, Melack JM, Dunne T, Mertes LAK, Hess LL, Smith LC. 2000. Interferometric radar measurements of water level changes on the Amazon flood plain, Nature 404: 174-177.
3. Bates PD. 2004. Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling Hydrological Processes 18: 2593-2597.
4. Bates PD, Marks KJ, Horritt MS. 2003. Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models. Hydrological Processes 17: 537-557.
5. Brasington J, Rumsby BT, McVey RA. 2000. Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using high resolution GPS-based survey. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25: 973-990.
6. Butler JB, Lane SN, Chandler JH. 1998. Assessment of DEM quality for characterizing surface roughness using close range digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record 16: 271-291.
7. Cobby DM, Mason DC, Davenport IJ. 2001. Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 67: 121-138.
8. Cobby DM, Mason DC, Horrit MS, Bates PD. 2003. Two-dimensional hydraulic flood modelling using a finite-element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes 17: 1979-2000.
9. Collins BD, Sitar N. 2008. Processes of coastal bluff erosion in weakly lithified sands, Pacifica, California, USA. Geomorphology 97: 483-501.
10. El-Sheimy, N., 2005. An Overview of Mobile Mapping Systems. FIG Working Week 2005 and GSDI-8, Cairo, Egypt April 16-21, on-line publication.
11. Fonstad MA, Marcus WA. 2005. Remote sensing of stream depths with hydraulically assisted bathymetry (HAB) models. Geomorphology 72: 107-120.
12. French JR. 2003. Airborne lidar in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling. Earth Surface processes and Landforms 28: 321-335.
13. Fuller IC, Large ARG, Charlton ME, Heritage GL, Milan DJ. 2003. Reach-scale sediment transfers: an evaluation of two morphological budgeting approaches. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28: 889-904.
14. Heritage G, Hetherington D. 2007. Towards a protocol for laser scanning in fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 66-74.
15. Heritage GL, Large ARG. 2009. Fundamentals of laser scanning. In Laser Scanning for the Environmental Sciences. Heritage GL, Large ARG (eds). Wiley-Blackwell: London; 21-35.
16. Hudson PF, Colditz RR. 2003. Flood delineation in a large and complex alluvial valley, lower Pánuco basin, Mexico. Journal of Hydrology 280: 229-245.
17. Hyyppä J, Kelle O, Lehikoinen M, Inkinen M. 2001. A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-dimensional tree height models produced by laser scanner. IEEE Transactions of Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39: 969-975.
18. Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Leckie D, Gougeon F, Yu X, Maltamo M. 2008. Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29(5): 1339-1366.
19. Häkli P. 2004. Practical test on accuracy and usability of virtual reference station method in Finland. In Conference Proceedings of FIG Working Week 2004, Athens, Greece: FIG; 1-16.
20. Jaakkola A, Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Kukko A. 2008. Retrieval algorithms for road surface modelling using laser-based mobile mapping. Sensors 8: 5238-5249.
21. Kager H. 2004. Discrepancies between overlapping laser scanner strips - simultaneous fitting of aerial laser scanner strips. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XXXV(Part B/1): 555-560.
22. Kukko A, Andrei C-O, Salminen V-M, Kaartinen H, Chen Y, Rönnholm P, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J, Chen R, Haggrén H, Kosonen I, Čapek K. 2007. Road environment mapping system of the Finnish Geodetic Institute - FGI Roamer. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop 'Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007'. Rönnholm P, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J. (eds.). International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36(3/W52): 241-247.
23. Lane S, Chandler J, Richards K. 1994. Developments in monitoring and modelling small-scale river bed topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 19: 349-368.
24. Lane SN, Westaway RM, Hick DM. 2003. Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel-bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing. Earth Surface Processes a nd Landforms 28: 249-271.
25. Large ARG, Heritage GL. 2007. Terrestrial laser scanner based instream habitat quantification using a random field approach. Proceedings of the RSPSoc Conference 2007. Newcastle University, 4-8 September 2007.
26. Mansikkaniemi H, Mäki O-P. 1990. Paleochannels and recent channels in the Pulmankijoki valley, northern Lapland. Fennia 168: 137-152.
27. Mason DC, Horritt MS, Hunter NM, Bates PD. 2007. Use of fused airborne scanning laser altimetry and digital map data for urban flood modelling. Hydrological Processes 21: 1436-1447.
28. Milan DJ. 2009. Terrestrial laser scan-derived topographic and roughness data for hydraulic modelling of gravel-bed rivers. In Laser Scanning of Terrestrial Environment Science. Heritage GL, Large ARG (eds). Wiley-Blackwell: London; 133-146.
29. Milan DJ, Hetherington D, Heritage GL. 2007. Application of a 3D laser scanner in the assessment of a proglacial fluvial sediment budget. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 1657-1674.
30. Milledge DG, Lane SN, Warburton J. 2009. The potential of digital filtering of generic topographic data for geomorphological research. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 34: 63-74.
31. Néelz S, Pender G, Villanueva I, Wilson M, Wright NG, Bates P. Mason D, Whitlow C. 2006. Using remotely sensed data to support flood modelling. Proceedings of the Civil Engineering, Water Management 159: 35-43.
32. Sanders BF. 2007. Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modelling. Advances in Water Resources 30: 1831-1843.
33. Smith MJ, Chandler J, Rose J. 2009. High spatial resolution data acquisition for the geosciences: kite aerial photography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 34: 155-161.
34. Talaya, J., Bosch, E., Alamús, R., Serra, A., and A. Baron, 2004. GEOVAN: the mobile mapping system from the ICC. Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology (MMT'2004). Kumming, 2004.
35. Tao, C.V., 2001. Mobile mapping technology for road network data acquisition. Journal of Geospatial Engineering 2: 1-13.
36. Teza G, Pesci A, Genevois R, Galgaro A. 2008. Characterization of landslide ground surface kinematics from terrestrial laser scanning and strain field computation, Geomorphology 97: 424-437.
37. Yu X, Hyyppä J, Kukko A, Maltamo M, Kaartinen H. 2006. Change detection techniques for canopy height growth measurements using airborne laser scanner data. Photogrammetry Engineering and Remote Sensing 72: 1339-1348.
38. Zhang, K, Xiao B. 2003. Current status of low-cost GPS and mobile mapping systems. Department of Geospatial Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 10 p. URL: http://www.gs.rmit.edu.au/news/april03/Zhang+Xiao_Low%20cost%20GPS.pdf. Accessed 6.5.2008.
39. Zhao H, Shibasaki R. 2003. A vehicle-borne urban 3-D acquisition system using single-row laser range scanners. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 33: 658-666.