Does the availability of arboreal honeydew determine the prevalence of ecologically dominant ants in restored habitats?

Insectes Sociaux

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 405-412

  Gibb, H ^a,b   Cunningham, S A ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Ant hemiptera mutualisms; Arboreal sugars; Dominant ants; Floral nectar; Honeydew; Restoration chronosequence

Indexed keywords

ANT; ARBOREAL SPECIES; CHRONOSEQUENCE; DOMINANCE; HABITAT RESTORATION; HABITAT TYPE; HONEYDEW; NECTAR; SUCCESSION; SUGAR;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

ACACIA; CUCUMIS MELO VAR. INODORUS; EUCALYPTUS; FORMICIDAE; HEMIPTERA;

EID: 70350426355     PISSN: 00201812     EISSN: 14209098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-009-0038-9     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Andersen A.N. 1990. The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: a review and a recipe. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aus. 16: 347-357.
2. Andersen A.N. and Morrison S.C. 1998. Myrmecochory in Australia's seasonal tropics: Effects of disturbance on distance dispersal. Aust. J. Ecol. 23: 483-491.
3. Beggs J.R., Karl B.J., Wardle D.A. and Bonner K.I. 2005. Soluble carbon production by honeydew scale insects in a New Zealand beech forest. N.Z. J. Ecol.29: 105-115.
4. Birtchnell M.J. and Gibson M. 2006. Long-term flowering patterns of melliferous Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) species. Aust. J. Bot.54: 745-754.
5. Blüthgen N., Verhaagh M., Goitia W., Jaffe K., Morawetz W. and Barthlott W. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125: 229-240.
6. Blüthgen N. and Fiedler K. 2004. Competition for composition: lessons from nectar-feeding ant communities. Ecology 85: 1479-1485.
7. Blüthgen N., Gottsberger G. and Fiedler K. 2004. Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Aust. Ecol.29: 418-429.
8. Brooker M.I.H, Slee A.V., Connors J.R. and Duffy S.M. 2002. Euclid: Eucalypts of Southern Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
9. Cornelissen T, Wilson Fernandes G and Vasconcellos-Neto J 2008. Size does matter: Variation in herbivory between and within plants and the plant vigour hypothesis. Oikos 117: 1121-1130.
10. CSIRO 1996. The Insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Victoria. 1137 pp.
11. Davidson D.W. 1998. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol. Entomol. 23: 484-490.
12. Davidson D.W. 1997. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 153-181.
13. Davidson D.W., Cook S.C., Snelling R.R. and Chua T.H. 2003. Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300: 969-972.
14. Davis A.R. 1997. Influence of floral visitation on nectar-sugar composition and nectary surface changes in Eucalyptus. Apidologie 28: 27-42.
15. Dejean A., Bourgoin T. and Gibernau M. 1997. Ant species that protect figs against other ants: Result of territoriality induced by a mutualistic homopteran. Ecoscience 4: 446-453.
16. Eastwood R. and Fraser A.M. 1999. Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia. Aust. J. Ecol. 24: 503-537.
17. Eisner T. 1957. A comparative morphological study of the proventriculus of ants. Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 116: 429-490.
18. Folgarait P.J. 1998. Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 1221-1244.
19. Flatt T. and Weisser W.W. 2000. The effects of mutualistic ants on aphid life history traits. Ecology 81: 3522-3529.
20. Gibb H. 2005. The effect of a dominant ant, Iridomyrmex purpureus, on resource use by ant assemblages depends on microhabitat and resource type. Austral Ecology 30: 856-867.
21. Gibb H. and Hochuli D.F. 2004. Removal experiment reveals limited effects of a behaviorally dominant species on ant assemblages. Ecology 85: 648-657.
22. Goldberg J.L., Grant J.W.A. and Lefebvre L. 2001. Effects of the temporal predictability and spatial clumping of food on the intensity of competitive aggression in the Zenaida dove. Behav. Ecol.12: 490-495.
23. Gove A.D., Majer J.D. and Dunn R.R. 2007. A keystone ant species promotes seed dispersal in a "diffuse" mutualism. Oecologia 153: 687-697.
24. Grant J.W.A. and Guha R.T. 1993. Spatial clumping of food increases its monopolization and defense by convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Behav. Ecol.4: 293-296.
25. Grover C.D., Kay A.D., Monson J.A., Marsh T.C. and Holway D.A. 2007. Linking nutrition and behavioural dominance: carbohydrate scarcity limits aggression and activity in Argentine ants. Proc. R. Soc. B. 274: 2951-2957.
26. Hoffmann B.D. and Andersen A.N. 2003. Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups. Austral Ecol.28: 444-464.
27. Holway D.A., Lach L., Suarez A.V., Tsutsui N.D. and Case T.J. 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.33: 181-233.
28. Huberty A.F. and Denno R.F. 2004. Plant water stress and its consequences for herbivorous insects - a new synthesis. Ecology 85: 1383-1398.
29. Jonasson S., Michelsen A., Schmidt I.K., Nielsen E.V. and Callaghan T.V. 1996. Microbial biomass C N and P in two Arctic soils and responses to addition of NPK fertilizer and sugar: Implications for plant nutrient uptake. Oecologia 106: 507-515.
30. Kelly D. 1990. Honeydew density in mixed Nothofagus forest, Westland, New Zealand. N.Z. J. Bot.28: 53-58.
31. Kenrick J. 2003. Review of pollen-pistil interactions and their relevance to reproductive biology of Acacia. Aust. Syst. Bot.16: 119-130.
32. Lach L. 2003. Invasive ants: Unwanted partners in ant-plant interactions? Ann. Missouri Bot. Gardens 90: 91-108.
33. Law B.S. and Chidel M. 2008 Quantifying the canopy nectar resource and the impact of logging and climate in spotted gum Corymbia maculata forests. Aust. Ecol. 33: 999-1014.
34. Maslin B.R. 2001. Wattle: Acacias of Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
35. Michalzik B., Müller T. and Stadler B. 1999. Aphids on Norway spruce and their effects on forest-floor solution chemistry. For. Ecol. Manage. 118: 1-10.
36. Ness J.H. and Bronstein I.L. 2004. The effects of invasive ants on prospective ant mutualists. Biol. Inv.6: 445-461.
37. Orians G.H. and Milewski A.V. 2007. Ecology of Australia: The effects of nutrient-poor soils and intense fires. Biol. Rev. 82: 393-423.
38. Parr C.L., Andersen A.N., Chastagnol C. and Duffaud C. 2007. Savanna fires increase rates and distances of seed dispersal by ants. Oecologia 151: 33-41.
39. thEdition: Introduction. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead.
40. Pimm S.L. 1978. An experimental approach to the effects of predictability on community structure. Am. Zool.18: 797-808.
41. Price P.W. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62: 244-251.
42. PRIMER-E Ltd 2002. PRIMER for Windows, Version 529.
43. Room P.M. 1975. Relative distributions of ant species in cocoa plantations in Papua New Guinea. J. Appl. Ecol.12: 47-61.
44. SAS Institute (2007) JMP. SAS Institute INC, Cary, N.C.
45. Schemske D.W. 1982. Ecological correlates of a neotropical mutualism: ant assemblages at Costus extrafloral nectaries. Ecology 63: 932-941.
46. Sedgley M. 1989. Acacia. In: Handbook of Flowering (Halevy A H., Ed), CRC Press. 753 pp.
47. Seeger J. and Filser J. 2008. Bottom-up down from the top: Honeydew as a carbon. source for soil organisms. Eur. J. Soil Biol.44: 483-490.
48. Shattuck S.O. 1999. Australian Ants: Their Biology and Identification. CSIRO Publishing, Australia. 226 pp.
49. Stadler B. and Dixon A.F.G. 2005. Ecology and evolution of aphid-ant interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 345-372.
50. Stadler B. and Michalzik B. 1998. Linking aphid honeydew throughfall and forest floor solution chemistry of Norway spruce. Ecol. Lett.1: 13-16.
51. Stadler B., Michalzik B. and Müller T. 1998. Linking aphid ecology with nutrient fluxes in a coniferous forest. Ecology 79: 1514-1525.
52. Stadler B., Solinger S. and Michalzik B. 2001. Insect herbivores and the nutrient flow from the canopy to the soil in coniferous and deciduous forests. Oecologia1 26: 104-113.
53. Stafford Smith D.M. and Morton S.R. 1990. A framework for the ecology of arid Australia. J. Arid Env.18: 255-278.
54. Stone G.N., Raine N.E., Prescott M. and Wilmer P.G. 2003. Pollination ecology of acacias (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae). Aust. Syst. Bot.16: 103-118.
55. Styrsky J.D. and Eubanks M.D. 2007. Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proc. R. Soc. B274: 151-164.
56. Way M.J. 1958. The influence of other ant species on biological control of Oecophylla longinoda. Latr. Proc. X Int. Congr. Entomol.4: 595-596.
57. Way M.J. 1963. Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8: 307-344.
58. Yao I. and Akimoto S. 2001. Ant attendance changes the sugar composition of the honeydew of the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola. Oecologia 128: 36-43.