Molecular phylogeny and systematics of flowering plants of the family Crassulaceae DC1

Molecular Biology

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 794-803

  Gontcharova, S B ^a   Gontcharov, A A ^b  

^a BOTANICAL GARDEN INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^b Institute of Biology and Soil Science   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Crassulaceae; DNA; Homoplasy; Molecular phylogenetics; Nucleotide sequences; Systematics

Indexed keywords

CRASSULACEAE; HYLOTELEPHIUM TELEPHIUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SAXIFRAGALES;

EID: 70350352768     PISSN: 00268933     EISSN: 16083245     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S0026893309050112     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Eggli U. 2003. Illustrated handbook of succulent plants: Crassulaceae. Berlin: Springer.
2. Ham R.C.H.J., t' Hart H. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships in the Crassulaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Am. J. Bot.85, 123-134.
3. Keeley J.E. 1998. Photosynthetic pathway diversity in a seasonal pool community. Funct. Ecol.13, 106-118.
4. Keeley J.E., Rundel P.W. 2003. Evolution of CAM and C4 carbon concentrating mechanisms. Int. J. Plant Sci.164, 55-77.
5. De Candolle A.P. 1830. Penthorum. In: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 3. Ed. De Candolle A.P. Paris: Truettel and Wurtz, p. 414.
6. Engler A. 1930. Saxifragaceae. In: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol 18a, 2nd ed. Eds Engler A., Prantl K. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, pp. 74-226.
7. Takhtajan A. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev.46, 225-359, 225-359.
8. Cronquist A. 1991. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. N.Y.: Columbia Univ. Press.
9. Thorne R.F. 2000. The classification and geography of the flowering plants: Dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae (Subclasses Magnoliidae, Ranunculidae, Caryophyllidae, Dilleniidae, Rosidae, Asteridae, and Lamiidae). Bot. Rev.66, 441-647.
10. Hoot S.B., Magallo S.N., Crane P.R. 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular datasets: atpB, rbcL, and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.86, 1-32.
11. Qiu Y.L., Lee J., Bernasconi-Quadroni F., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Zanis M., Zimmer E.A., Chen Z.D., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: Evidence from mitochondrial, plastid, and nuclear genomes. Nature.402, 404-407.
12. Savolainen V., Chase M.W., Hoot S.B., Morton C.M., Soltis D.E., Bayer C. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol.49, 306-362.
13. Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Chase M.W., et al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from a combined data set of 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.133, 381-461.
14. Fishbein M., Hibsch-Jetter C., Soltis D.E., Hufford L. 2001. Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): Analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. Syst. Biol.50, 817-847.
15. Fishbein M., Soltis D.E. 2004. Further resolution of the rapid radiation of Saxifragales (Angiosperms, Eudicots) supported by mixed-model Bayesian analysis. Syst. Bot.29, 883-891.
16. Wikström N., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: Calibrating the tree. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Bio.268, 2211-2220.
17. Crepet W.L., Nixon K.C., Gandolfo M.A. 2004. Fossil evidence and phylogeny: The age of major angiosperm clades based on mesofossil and macrofossil evidence from Cretaceous deposits. Am. J. Bot.91, 1666-1682.
18. Mort M.E., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Francisco-Ortega J., Santos-Guerra A. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Crassulaceae inferred from matK sequence data. Am. J. Bot.88, 76-91.
19. 't Hart H., Eggli U. 1995. Introduction: evolution of Crassulaceae systematics. In: Evolution and systematics of the Crassulaceae. Eds. 't Hart H., Eggli U. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 7-15.
20. Berger A. 1930. Crassulaseae. In: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol 18a, 2nd ed. Eds. Engler A., Prantl K. Leipzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann, pp. 352-485.
21. Uhl C.H. 1963. Chromosomes and phylogeny of the Crassulaceae. Cact. Succ. J.35, 80-84.
22. Ohba H. 1978. Generic and infrageneric classification of the Old World Sedoideae (Crassulaceae). J. Fac. Sci., Univ. Tokyo: Sec. III.12, 139-198.
23. Eggli U., t' Hart H., Nyffeler R. 1995. Towards a consensus classification of the Crassulaceae. In: Evolution and Systematics of the Crassulaceae. Eds. 't Hart H., Eggli U. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 173-192.
24. Takhtajan A.L. 1987. Sistema magnoliofitov (The System of Magnoliophytes). Leningrad: Nauka.
25. Takhtajan A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. N.Y.: Columbia Univ. Press.
26. Albert V.A., Williams S.E., Chase M.W. 1992. Carnivorous plants: Phylogeny and structural evolution. Science.257, 1491-1495.
27. Grund C., Jensen U. 1981. Systematic relationships of Saxifragales revealed by serological characteristics of seed proteins. Plant Syst. Evol.137, 1-22.
28. Hufford L. 1992. Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: A phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79, 218-248.
29. Chase M.W., Soltis D.E., Olmstead R.G., et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80, 528-580.
30. Morgan D.R., Soltis D.E. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80, 631-660.
31. Soltis D.E., Morgan D.R., Grable A., Soltis P.S., Kuzoff R. 1993. Molecular systematics of Saxifragaceae sensu stricto. Am. J. Bot.80, 1056-1081.
32. Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Nickrent D.L., et al. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.84, 1-49.
33. Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato: A comparison of topologies based on 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. Am. J. Bot.84, 504-522.
34. Ueda K., Hanyuda T., Nakano A., Shiuchi T., Seo A., Okubo H., Hotta M. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic position of Podostemaceae, a marvelous aquatic flowering plant family. J. Plant Res.110, 87-92.
35. Nickrent D.L., Der J.P., Anderson F.E. 2005. Discovery of the photosynthetic relatives of the Maltese mushroom Cynomorium. BMC Evol. Biol.5, 38.
36. Soltis D.E., Mort M.E., Soltis P.S., Hibsch-Jetter C., Zimmer E.A., Morgan D. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic angiosperm family Podostemaceae inferred from 18S rDNA and rbcL sequence data. Mol. Phyl. Evol.11, 261-272.
37. Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Endress P.K, Chase M.W. 2005. Phylogeny and Evolution of Angiosperms. Sunderland: Sinauer Assoc.
38. Ham R.C.H.J. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships in the Crassulaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA variation. In: Evolution and Systematics of the Crassulaceae. Eds. 't Hart H., Eggli U. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 16-29.
39. 't Hart H. 1995. Classification of the Crassulaceae. In: Evolution and Systematics of the Crassulaceae. Eds. t'Hart H., Eggli U. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 159-172.
40. Mayuzumi S., Ohba H. 2004. The phylogenetic position of East Asian Sedoideae (Crassulaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Bot.29, 587-598.
41. Gontcharova S.B., Gontcharov A.A., Stephenson R. 2008. Analysis of phylogenetic relationships in the family Crassulaceae based on nuclear ITS rDNA sequences. Bot. Zh.93, 96-113.
42. Gontcharova S.B., Gontcharov A.A. 2004. Sequence and secondary structure evolution of ITS rDNA in the family Crassulaceae. In: Evolutionary Botany of Certain Plant-Groups of the East Eurasian Floristic Element Related to Japanese Flora on the Basis of Chromosomes. Abstract Book. Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 32-34.
43. Pollock D.D., Zwickl D.J., McGuire J.A., Hillis D.M. 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol.51, 664-671.
44. Hillis D.M., Pollock D.D., McGuire J.A., Zwickl D.J. 2003. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst. Biol.52, 124-126.
45. Carrillo-Reyes P., Sosa V., Mort M.E. 2008. Thompsonella and the Echeveria group (Crassulaceae): Phylogenetic relationships based on molecular and morphological characters. Taxon.57, 863-874.
46. Mes T.H.M., Wijers G.J., t' Hart H. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Monanthes (Crassulaceae) based on morphological, chloroplast and nuclear DNA variation. J. Evol. Biol.10, 193-216.
47. Fairfield K.N., Mort M.E., Santos-Guerra A. 2002. Phylogenetics and evolution of the Macaronesian members of the genus Aichryson (Crassulaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast sequence. Plant Syst. Evol.248, 71-83.
48. Mort M.E., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Francisco-Ortega J., Santos-Guerra A. 2002. Phylogenetics and evolution of the Macaronesian clade of Crassulaceae inferred from nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Syst. Bot.27, 271-288.
49. Mort M.E., Levsen N., Randle C.P., van Jaarsveld E., Palmer A. 2005. Phylogenetics and diversification of Cotyledon (Crassulaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence data. Am. J. Bot.92, 1170-1176.
50. Mort M.E., Archibald J.K., Randle C.P., Levsen N.D., O'Leary T.R., Topalov K., Wiegand C.M., Crawford D.J. 2007. Inferring phylogeny at low taxonomic levels: Utility of rapidly evolving cpDNA and nuclear ITS loci. Am. J. Bot.94, 173-183.
51. Uhl C.H. 1993. Intergeneric hybrids in the Mexican Crassulaceae: 1. Lenophyllum. Cact. Succ. J.65, 271-273.
52. Uhl C.H. 1994a. Intergeneric hybrids in the Mexican Crassulaceae: 2. Dudleya. Cact. Succ. J.66, 74-80.
53. Uhl C.H. 1994b. Intergeneric hybrids in the Mexican Crassulaceae: 3. Thompsonella. Cact. Succ. J.66, 175-179.
54. Uhl C.H. 1994c. Intergeneric hybrids in the Mexican Crassulaceae: 4. Villadia. Cact. Succ. J.66, 214-217.
55. Nyffeler R. 1995. Hybridization in Monanthes. In: Evolution and Systematics of the Crassulaceae. Eds. 't Hart H., Eggli U. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 76-88.
56. Acevedo-Rosas R., Camero K., Sosa V., Pell S. 2004. A molecular phylogenetic study of Graptopetalum (Crassulaceae) based on ETS, ITS, rpl16, and trnL-F nucleotide sequences. Am. J. Bot.91, 1099-1104.
57. Uhl C.H. 1970. Chromosomes of Graptopetalum and Thompsonella (Crassulaceae). Am. J. Bot.85, 123-134.
58. Hermsen E.J., Nixon K.C., Crepet W.L. 2006. The impact of extinct taxa on understanding the early evolution of Angiosperm clades: An example incorporating fossil reproductive structures of Saxifragales. Plant Syst. Evol.260, 141-169.
59. van Jaarsveld E.J. 2003. Crassula. In: Illustrated Handbook of Succulent Plants: Crassulaceae. Ed. Eggli U. Berlin: Springer, pp. 32-84.
60. Baldwin J.T. 1938. Kalanchoe: The genus and its chromosomes. Am. J. Bot.25, 572-579.
61. Uhl C.H. 1948. Cytotaxonomic studies in the subfamilies Crassuloideae, Kalanchoideae, and Cotyledonoideae of the Crassulaceae. Am. J. Bot.35, 695-706.
62. Thiede J., Eggli U., 2007. Crassulaceae DC. In: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Ed. Kubitzki K. Berlin: Springer, pp. 83-118.
63. Gehrig H., Gaubmann O., Marx H., Schwarzrott D., Kluge M. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the ITS-1 and ITS-2 regions. Plant Sci.160, 827-835.
64. Gontcharova S.B., Artyukova E.V., Gontcharov A.A. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among members of the subfamily Sedoideae (Crassulaceae) inferred from the ITS region sequences of nuclear rDNA. Genetika (Moscow). 42, 803-811.
65. Gontcharova S.B. 2006. Podsemeistvo Sedoideae (Crassulaceae) flory Sibiri i Rossiiskogo Dal'nego Vostoka (Subfamily Sedoideae (Crassulaceae) in the Flora of Siberia and the Russian Far East). Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.
66. Jorgensen T., Frydenberg H.J. 1999. Diversification in insular plants: Inferring the phylogenetic relationship in Aeonium (Crassulaceae) using ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Nordic J. Bot.19, 613-621.
67. Mes T.H.M. 1995a. Origin and Evolution of the Macaronesian Sempervivoideae. Utrecht: Utrecht Univ. Press.
68. Mes T.H.M. 1995b. Phylogenetic and systematic implications of chloroplast and nuclear spacer sequence variation in the Macaronesian Sempervivoideae and related Sedoideae. In: Evolution and Systematics of the Crassulaceae. Eds. 't Hart H., Eggli U. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 30-44.
69. 't Hart H., Bleij B., Zonneveld B. 2003. Sempervivum. In: Illustrated Handbook of Succulent Plants: Crassulaceae. Ed. Eggli U. Berlin: Springer, pp. 332-349.
70. Favarger C., Maeder A.M., Zesiger F. 1968. Hybrides interspecifiques et intergeneriques chez les Jovibarbes. Archiv der Julius Klaus-Stiftung Vererbungsforschung, Sozialanthropologie und Rassenhygiene.43, 180.
71. Uhl C.H. 1961. The chromosomes of the Sempervivoideae (Crassulaceae). Am. J. Bot.48, 114-123.
72. Ohba H. 1995. Systematic problems of Asian Sedoideae. In: Evolution and Systematics of the Crassulaceae. Eds. t' Hart H., Eggli U. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 153-158.