Has Maryland's priority funding areas initiative constrained the expansion of water and sewer investments?

Land Use Policy

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 175-186

  Howland, Marie ^a   Sohn, Jungyul ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; POPULATION GROWTH; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

MARYLAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748796424     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Planning Association, 1997. Growing Smart Newsletter. Winter. http://www.planning.org/growingsmart/news1296.html. April 28, 2004.
2. American Planning Association, 1999. Growing Smart Newsletter. Summer, www.planning.org/growingsmart/news0799.html. April 28, 2004.
3. American Planning Association, 2002. Planning for Smart Growth. February. http://www.planning.org.
4. Bae C., and Richardson H.W. Sprawl in Western Europe and the United States (2004), Ashgate, Aldershot
5. Baltimore Regional Partnership. Planning for Sprawl? A Look at Projected Residential Growth in the Baltimore Region (2001), Baltimore, Maryland
6. Binkley C., Collins B., Kanter L., Alford M., Shapiro M., and Tabors R. Interceptor Sewers and Urban Sprawl (1975), Lexington Books, Lexington, MA
7. Burby R.J., May P.J., Berke P.R., Dalton L.C., French S.P., and Kaiser E.J. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use (1997), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
8. Carruthers J.I. The impacts of state growth management programmes: a comparative analysis. Urban Studies 39 11 (2002) 1959-1982
9. Carruthers J.I. Evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory growth management programs: an analytic framework. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 4 (2002) 391-405
10. Carson J.M., Rivkin G.W., and Rivkin M.D. Community Growth and Water Resources Policy (1973), Praeger Press, New York
11. Cho C.-J. The Korean growth management programs: issues, problems and possible reforms. Land Use Policy 19 (2002) 13-27
12. Cohen J. Maryland's smart growth: using incentives to combat Sprawl. In: Squires G.D. (Ed). Urban Sprawl, Causes, Consequences, and Public Responses (2002), Urban Institute, Washington, DC 293-324
13. Daniels T.L., and Nelson A.C. Is Oregon's farmland preservation program working?. Journal of the American Planning Association 52 1 (1986) 22-32
14. Dawkins C., and Nelson A. Urban containment policies and housing prices: an international comparison with implications for future research. Land Use Policy 19 (2002) 1-12
15. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. fifth ed (2003), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
16. Kelly E.D. Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques, and Impacts (1993), Praeger Press, Westport, CT
17. Kline A.D., and Alig R.J. Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm lands?. Growth and Change 30 (1999) 3-22
18. Knaap G. The price effects of urban growth boundaries in metropolitan Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 61 (1985) 26-35
19. Knaap G., and Nelson A.C. The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State land Use Planning from Oregon (1992), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
20. Llewelyn-Davies Carson Ltd., 1978. Relationship of Water Supply and Urban Growth in the Denver Region, Denver. Llewelyn-Davies Carson Ltd, Prepared for the US Army Corps of Engineers.
21. Mansfield E. Applied Economics. second ed (1997), W.W Norton and Company, New York
22. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Smart Growth, Activities and Initiatives, Center for Smart Growth web site, October 6, 2003.
23. Maryland Office of Planning, 1997. The Smart Growth Areas Act of 1997, Managing Maryland's Growth: Models and Guidelines, Smart Growth: Designating Priority Funding Areas.
24. Moore T., and Nelson A.C. Lessons for effective urban containment and resource land preservation policy. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 120 4 (1994) 157-173
25. Nelson A.C. Using land markets to evaluate urban containment programs. Journal of the American Planning Association 52 2 (1986) 156-171
26. Nelson A.C. Blazing new planning trails in Oregon. Urban Land 49 8 (1990) 32-35
27. Nelson A.C. Oregon's Urban Growth Boundary as a Landmark Planning Tool. In: Carl Abbott, Deborah Howe, and Sy Adler (Eds). Planning the Oregon Way: A Twenty Year Evaluation (1994), Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
28. Nelson A.C. Comparing states with and without growth management: analysis based on indicators with policy implications. Land Use Policy 16 (1999) 121-127
29. Nelson A.C., and Dawkins C.J. Urban Containment in the United States (2004), American Planning Association, Chicago, IL PAS Report 520
30. Nelson A.C., and Moore T. Assessing growth management policy implementation: case study of the United States' leading growth management state. Land Use Policy 13 (1996) 241-259
31. Pendall R., Martin J., and Fulton W. Holding the Line: Urban Containment in the United States (2002), The Brookings Institution Center of Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC Discussion paper
32. Pollock P. Controlling sprawl in Boulder: benefits and pitfalls. Land Lines (1998), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, January
33. Tabors R.D., Shapiro M.H., and Rogers P.P. Land Use and the Pipe: Planning for Sewerage (1976), Lextington Books, Lexington, MA
34. Weitz J. From quiet revolution to smart growth: state growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. Journal of Planning Literature 14 2 (1999) 267-338
35. Weitz J., and Moore T. Development inside urban growth boundaries: Oregon's empirical evidence of contiguous urban form. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 4 (1998) 424-440
36. Whipple, M.D., 2000. Smart growths weak link?: An analytical evaluation of water and sewer planning in Maryland. Unpublished Masters Theses, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.