Enterprise zones and job creation: Linking evaluation and practice

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 242-254

  Boarnet, Marlon G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035640105     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089124240101500304     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bartels, C.P.A., Nicol, W. R., & van Duijn, J. J. (1982). Estimating the impact of regional policy: A review of applied research methods. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12(1), 3-41.
2. Berk, R. A., & Rossi, P. H. (1999). Thinking about program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Boarnet, M. G. (1994). An empirical model of intrametropolitan population and employment growth. Papers in Regional Science: The Journal of the RSAI, 73, 135-152.
4. Boarnet, M. G., & Bogart, W. T. (1996). Enterprise zones and employment: Evidence from New Jersey. Journal of Urban Economics, 40, 198-215.
5. Bostic, R. (1995). The impact of the California enterprise zone program on business location and investment decisions. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
6. Campbell, D. T., & Russo, M. J. (1999). Social experimentation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Carroll, R., & Wasylenko, M. (1994). Do state business climates still matter? Evidence of a structural change. National Tax Journal, 47, 19-37.
8. Dardia, M. (1998). Subsidizing redevelopment in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
9. Dowall, D. E. (1996). An evaluation of California's enterprise zone program. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 352-368.
10. Dowall, D. E., Beyeler, M., & Wong, S. (1994). Evaluation of California's enterprise zone and employment and economic incentive programs. Berkeley: University of California, California Policy Seminar.
11. Eisinger, P. (1995). State economic development in the 1990s: Politics and policy learning. Economic Development Quarterly, 9, 146-158.
12. Fox, J. (1996, November 11). Economics and the enterprise zone: The little policy that could. Fortune, 134, 54-56.
13. Gittell, R. J., & Wilder, M. (1993, October). Linking economic and community development: The experience in Indiana's enterprise zones. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, D.C.
14. Green, R. E., & Brintnall, M. (1987). Reconnoitering state-administered enterprise zones: What's in a name? Journal of Urban Affairs, 9, 159-170.
15. Green, W. H. (1993). Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Gueron, J. M., & Pauly, E. (1991). From welfare to work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Hall, P. (1977). Green fields and grey areas. Proceedings of the Royal Town Planning Institute annual conference. London: Royal Town Planning Institute.
18. Heckman, J. J. (1992). Randomization and social policy evaluation. In C. F. Manski & I. Garfinkel (Eds.), Evaluating welfare and training programs (pp. 201-230). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Heckman, J. J., & Hotz, V. J. (1989). Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower training. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 862-874.
20. Hotz, V. J. (1992). Designing an evaluation of the Job Training Partnership Act. In C. F. Manski & I. Garfinkel (Eds.), Evaluating welfare and training programs (pp. 76-114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Isserman, A. M., & Beaumont, P. M. (1989). New directions in quasi-experimental control group methods for project evaluation. Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 23, 39-53.
22. Isserman, A. M., & Merrifield, J. (1982). The use of control groups in evaluating regional policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12, 43-58.
23. Johnston, J., & Dinardo, J. (1996). Econometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Knudsen, D. C., & Barff, R. (1991). Shift-share analysis as a linear model. Environment and Planning A, 23, 421-431.
25. Luce, T. F., Jr. (1994). Local taxes, public services, and the intrametropolitan location of firms and households. Public Finance Quarterly, 22, 139-167.
26. Mier, R. (1982, April). Enterprise zones: A long shot. Planning, pp. 10-14.
27. New Jersey Department of Treasury, Division of Purchase and Property. (1996, May 23). Advertised Bid Proposal Number 97-X-24160. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Treasury.
28. Papke, J. A. (1989). Monitoring Indiana enterprise zones: Analysis and appraisal, year two report. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Center for Tax Policy Studies.
29. Papke, L. (1991). Tax policy and urban development: Evidence from an enterprise zone program. (Working Paper No. 3945). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30. Papke, L. (1994). Tax policy and urban development: Evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 37-49.
31. Patterson, M. G. ( 1991 ). A note on the formulation of a full-analogue regression model of the shift-share method. Journal of Regional Science, 31(2), 211-216.
32. Rephann, T., & Isserman, A. (1994). New highways as economic development tools: An evaluation using quasi-experimental matching methods. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24, 723-751.
33. Riecken, H. W. (1976). Social experimentation. In C. C. Abt (Ed.), The evaluation of social programs (pp 37-47). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. Rubin, B. M., & Wilder, M. G. (1989). Urban enterprise zones: Employment impacts and fiscal incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55, 418-431.
35. Rubin, M. (1990). Urban enterprise zones: Do they work? Evidence from New Jersey. Public Budgeting and Finance, 10, 3-17.
36. Rubin, M. M., & Armstrong, R. B. (1989). The New Jersey urban enterprise zone program: An evaluation (Report prepared for the New Jersey Department of Commerce, Energy, and Economic Development). Trenton: New Jersey Department of Commerce, Energy, and Economic Development.
37. Rubin, M. M., & Trawinski, E. J. (1991). New Jersey's urban enterprise zones: A program that works. The Urban Lawyer, 23, 461-471.
38. Wasylenko, M. (1991). Empirical evidence on interregional business location decisions and the role of fiscal incentives in economic development. In H. W. Herzog, Jr. & A. M. Schlottman (Eds.), Industry location and public policy (pp. 13-30). Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
39. White, S. B., Zipp, J. F., McMahon, W. F., Reynolds, P. D., Osterman, J. D., & Binkley, L. S. (1990). ES202: The data base for local employment analysis. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 240-253.
40. Wholey, J. S., Scanlon, J. W., Duffy, H. G., Fukumoto, J. S., & Vogt, L. M. (1970). Federal evaluation policy: Analyzing the effects of public programs. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
41. Wilder, M. G., & Rubin, B. M. (1996). Rhetoric versus reality: A review of studies on state enterprise zone programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 473-485.