Computational nonlinear dynamics model of percept switching with ambiguous stimuli

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5620 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 227-236

  Fürstenau, Norbert ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive bistability; Hurst parameter; Modelling; Nonlinear dynamics; Perception

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COGNITIVE BISTABILITY; HURST PARAMETER; MODELLING; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PERCEPTION;

DYNAMICS;

SIMULATORS;

EID: 70350303307     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02809-0_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Orbach, J., Zucker, E., Olson, R.: Reversibility of the Necker Cube: VII. Reversal rate as a function of figure-on and figure-off durations. Percept. and Motor Skills 22, 615-618 (1966)
2. Gao, J.B., Merk, I., Tung, W.W., Billok, V., White, K.D., Harris, J.G., Roychowdhury, V.P.: Inertia and memory in visual perception. Cogn. Process 7, 105-112 (2006)
3. Fürstenau, N.: A computational model of bistable perception-attention dynamics with long range correlations. In: Hertzberg, J., Beetz, M., Englert, R. (eds.) KI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4667, pp. 251-263. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
4. Ito, J., Nikolaev, A.R., Luman, M., Aukes, M.F., Nakatani, C., van Leeuwen, C.: Perceptual switching, eye movements, and the bus paradox. Perception 32, 681-698 (2003)
5. Blake, R., Logothetis, N.K.: Visual competition. Nature Reviews/Neuroscience 3, 1-11 (2002)
6. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., Heath, H.A.: Reversibility of the Necker Cube: An examination of the concept of satiation of orientation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 17, 439-458 (1963)
7. Borsellino, A., de Marco, A., Allazetta, A., Rinesi, S., Bartolini, B.: Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 10, 139-144 (1972)
8. Hock, H.S., Schöner, G., Giese, M.: The dynamical foundations of motion pattern formation: Stability, selective adaptation, and perceptual continuity. Perception & Psychophys-ics 65, 429-457 (2003)
9. Koch, C.: The Quest for Consciousness - A Neurobiological Approach, German Translation. Elsevier, München (2004)
10. Engel, A.K., Fries, P., Singer, W.: Dynamic Predictions: Oscillations and Synchrony in Top-Down Processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 704-718 (2001)
11. Engel, A.K., Fries, P., König, P., Brecht, M., Singer, W.: Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8, 128-151 (1999)
12. Srinavasan, R., Russel, D.S., Edelman, G.M., Tononi, G.: Increased synchronization of magnetic responses during conscious perception. J. Neuroscience 19, 5435-5448 (1999)
13. Edelman, G.: Wider than the Sky, pp. 87-96. Penguin Books (2004)
14. Fürstenau, N.: Modelling and Simulation of spontaneous perception switching with ambiguous visual stimuli in augmented vision systems. In: André, E., Dybkjær, L., Minker, W., Neumann, H., Weber, M. (eds.) PIT 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4021, pp. 20-31. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
15. Fürstenau, N.: A nonlinear dynamics model of Binocular Rivalry and Cognitive Multista-bility. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man, Cybernetics, pp. 1081-1088 (2003)
16. De Marco, A., Penengo, P., Trabucco, A., Borsellino, A., Carlini, F., Riani, M., Tuccio, M.T.: Stochastic Models and Fluctuations in Reversal Time of Ambiguous Figures. Perception 6, 645-656 (1977)
17. Merk, I.L.K., Schnakenberg, J.: A stochastic model of multistable perception. Biol. Cybern. 86, 111-116 (2002)
18. Poston, T., Stewart, I.: Nonlinear Modeling of Multistable Perception. Behavioral Science 23, 318-334 (1978)
19. Ditzinger, T., Haken, H.: A Synergetic Model of Multistability in Perception. In: Kruse, P., Stadler, M. (eds.) Ambiguity in Mind and Nature, pp. 255-273. Springer, Berlin (1995)
20. Levelt, W.J.M.: Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. Br. J. Psychol. 58, 143-145 (1967)
21. Lamme, V.A.F.: Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in cognitive Sciences 7, 12-18 (2003)
22. Tononi, G., Edelman, G.M.: Consciousness and Complexity. Science 282, 1846-1851 (1998)
23. Schuster, H.G., Wagner, P.A.: A Model for Neural Oscillations in the Visual Cortex: 1. Mean field theory and the derivation of the phase equations. Biol. Cybern. 64, 77-82 (1990)
24. Kelso, J.A.S., Case, P., Holroyd, T., Horvath, E., Raczaszek, J., Tuller, B., Ding, M.: Multistability and metastability in perceptual and brain dynamics. In: Kruse, P., Stadler, M. (eds.) Ambiguity in Mind and Nature, pp. 255-273. Springer, Berlin (1995)
25. Nakatani, H., van Leeuwen, C.: Transient synchrony of distant brain areas and perceptual switching in ambiguous figures. Biol. Cybern. 94, 445-457 (2006)
26. Itti, L., Koch, C.: Computational Modelling of Visual Attention. Nature Reviews Neuro-science 2, 194-203 (2001)
27. Robinson, D. (ed.): Neurobiology. Springer, Berlin (1998)
28. Hillyard, S.A., Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J.: Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. In: Humphreys, G.W., Duncan, J., Treisman, A. (eds.) Attention, Space, and Action, pp. 31-53. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)
29. Nakatani, H., van Leeuwen, C.: Individual Differences in Perceptual Switching rates: the role of occipital alpha and frontal theta band activity. Biol. Cybern. 93, 343-354 (2005)