A computational model of bistable perception-attention dynamics with long range correlations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4667 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 251-263

  Fürstenau, Norbert ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive bistability; Hurst parameter; Modelling; Nonlinear dynamics; Perception

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COGNITIVE BISTABILITY; HURST PARAMETERS; MEMORY TIME CONSTANT;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 38149035963     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74565-5_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Gao, J.B., Merk, I., Tung, W.W., Billok, V., White, K.D., Harris, J.G., Roychowdhury, V.P.: Inertia and memory in visual perception. Cogn. Process 7, 105-112 (2006)
2. Mandelbrot, B.B.: The fractal Geometry of Nature. German translation: Birkhäuser, pp. 265-270 (1991)
3. Fürstenau, N.: Modelling and Simulation of spontaneous perception switching with ambiguous visual stimuli in augmented vision systems. In: André, E., Dybkjær, L., Minker, W., Neumann, H., Weber, M. (eds.) PIT 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol.4021, pp. 20-31. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
4. Ito, J., Nikolaev, A.R., Luman, M., Aukes, M.F., Nakatani, C., van Leeuwen, C.: Perceptual switching, eye movements, and the bus paradox. Perception 32, 681-698 (2003)
5. Blake, R., Logothetis, N.K.: Visual competition. Nature Reviews / Neuroscience 3, 1-11 (2002)
6. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., Heath, H.A: Reversibility of the Necker Cube: An examination of the concept of satiation of orientation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 17, 439-458 (1963)
7. Borsellino, A., de Marco, A., Allazetta, A., Rinesi, S., Bartolini, B.: Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 10, 139-144 (1972)
8. Hupe, J.-M., Rubin, N.: The dynamics of bistable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Research 43, 531-548 (2003)
9. Koch, C.: The Quest for Consciousness - A Neurobiological Approach, German Translation, Elsevier, München (2004)
10. Engel, A.K., Fries, P., Singer, W.: Dynamic Predictions: Oscillations and Synchrony in Top-Down Processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 704-718 (2001)
11. Engel, A.K., Fries, P., König, P., Brecht, M., Singer, W.: Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8, 128-151 (1999)
12. Srinavasan, R., Russel, D.S., Edelman, G.M., Tononi, G.: Increased synchronization of magnetic responses during conscious perception. J. Neuroscience 19, 5435-5448 (1999)
13. Edelman, G.: Wider than the Sky. Penguin Books, pp. 87-96 (2004)
14. Kettani, H., Gubner, J.A.: A Novel Approach to the Estimation of the Long-Range Dependence Parameter. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems-II: Express Briefs 53, 463-467 (2006)
15. De Marco, A., Penengo, P., Trabucco, A., Borsellino, A., Carlini, F., Riani, M., Tuccio, M.T.: Stochastic Models and Fluctuations in Reversal Time of Ambiguous Figures. Perception 6, 645-656 (1977)
16. Merk, I.L.K., Schnakenberg, J.: A stochastic model of multistable perception. Biol. Cybern. 86, 111-116 (2002)
17. Poston, T., Stewart, I.: Nonlinear Modeling of Multistable Perception. Behavioral Science 23, 318-334 (1978)
18. Ditzinger, T., Haken, H.: A Synergetic Model of Multistability in Perception. In: Kruse, P., Stadler, M. (eds.) Ambiguity in Mind and Nature, pp. 255-273. Springer, Berlin (1995)
19. Levelt, W.J.M.: Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. Br. J. Psychol. 58, 143-145 (1967)
20. Lamme, V.A.F.: Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in cognitive Sciences 7, 12-18 (2003)
21. Tononi, G., Edelman, G.M.: Consciousness and Complexity. Science 282, 1846-1851 (1998)
22. Schuster, H.G., Wagner, P.A.: A Model for Neural Oscillations in the Visual Cortex: 1. Mean field theory and the derivation of the phase equations. Biol. Cybern. 64, 77-82 (1990)
23. Kelso, J.A.S., Case, P., Holroyd, T., Horvath, E., Raczaszek, J., Tuller, B., Ding, M.: Multistability and metastability in perceptual and brain dynamics. In: Kruse, P., Stadler, M. (eds.) Ambiguity in Mind and Nature, pp. 255-273. Springer, Berlin (1995)
24. Nakatani, H., van Leeuwen, C.: Transient synchrony of distant brain areas and perceptual switching in ambiguous figures. Biol. Cybern. 94, 445-457 (2006)
25. Itti, L., Koch, C.: Computational Modelling of Visual Attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 194-203 (2001)
26. Robinson, D. (ed.): Neurobiology. Springer, Berlin (1998)
27. Fürstenau, N.: A chaotic attractor model of cognitive multistability. In: Proceedings IEEE 2004 Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE cat. no. 04CH37583C, pp. 853-859 (2004)
28. Hillyard, S.A., Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J.: Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. In: Humphreys, G.W., Duncan, J., Treisman, A. (eds.) Attention, Space, and Action, pp. 31-53. Oxford University Press (1999)
29. Nakatani, H., van Leeuwen, C.: Individual Differences in Perceptual Switching rates: the role of occipital alpha and frontal theta band activity. Biol. Cybern. 93, 343-354 (2005)
30. Watts, C., Fürstenau, N.: Multistable fiber-optic Michelson Interferometer exhibiting 95 stable states. IEEE I. Quantum Electron 25, 1-5 (1989)
31. Zhou, Y.H., Gao, J.B., White, K.D., Merk, I., Yao, K.: Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception. Biol. Cybern. 90, 256-263 (2004)
32. Pitts, M.A., Nerger, J.L., Davis, T.J.R.: Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual reversals for three different types of multistable images. J. of Vision 7, 1-14 (2007)
33. Fürstenau, N.: Nonlinear dynamics model of cognitive multistability and binocular rivalry. In: Proceedings IEEE 2003 Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE cat. no. 03CH37483C, pp. 1081-1088 (2003)
34. Lutzenberger, W., Preissl, H., Pulvermüller, F.: Fractal dimension of electroencephalographic time series and underlying brain processes. Biol. Cybern. 73, 477-482 (1995)
35. Dafilis, M.P., Liley, D.T.J., Cadusch, P.J.: Robust chaos in a model of the electroencephalogram: Implications for brain dynamics. Chaos 11, 474-478 (2001)
36. Burke, D.P., de Paor, A.M.: A stochastic limit cycle oscillator model of the EEG. Biol. Cybern. 91, 221-230 (2004)
37. Richards, W., Wilson, H.R., Sommer, M.A.: Chaos in percepts. Biol. Cybern. 70, 345-349 (1994)
38. Deco, G., Marti, D.: Deterministic Analysis of Stochastic Bifurcations in Multi-Stable Neurodynamical Systems. Biol. Cybern. 96, 487-496 (2007)
39. Wilson, H.R.: Spikes, Decisions, and Actions. Oxford University Press (1999)
40. von der Malsburg, C.: The Coherence Definition of Consciousness. In: Ho, M., Miyashita, Y., Rolls, E.T. (eds.) Cognition, Computation, and Consciousnesss, pp. 193-204. Oxford University Press (1997)
41. Meng, M., Tong, F.: Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. J. of Vision 4, 539-551 (2004)
42. Hamker, F.H.: A dynamic model of how feature cues guide spatial attention. Vision research 44, 501-521 (2004)
43. Lehky, S.R.: Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259, 71-76 (1995)