Are learning repositories likely to become mainstream in education?

WEBIST 2006 - 2nd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Proceedings

Volumn IT, Issue WIA/-, 2006, Pages

  McNaught, Carmel ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Community digital libraries; Learning objects; Learning repositories

Indexed keywords

HONG-KONG; KEY SUCCESS FACTORS; LEARNING OBJECTS; LEARNING REPOSITORIES; TECHNICAL FACTORS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 70350252328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., & Harper, B. (2004). Developing a learning object metadata application profile based on LOM suitable for the Australian higher education context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 191-208.
2. Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 46-58.
3. Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., Haynes, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Can learning objects contribute to pedagogical improvement in higher education: Lessons from a case study? Paper based on presentation given at CAL '2003, April 2003. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/ ltri/learningobjects/paper s-pres/CAL-Objects-paper.doc
4. Cole, T. W. (2002). Creating a framework of guidance for building good digital collections. First Monday, 7(5). Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7-5/cole/index.html
5. Downes, S. (2001). Learning objects. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v2.1/downes.html
6. Friesen, N. (2004). Three objections to learning objects and e-learning standards. In R. McGreal (Ed.), Online education using learning objects (pp. 59-70). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
7. Gibbons, A. S., Nelson, J., & Richards, R. (2000). The nature and origin of instructional objects. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/gibbons.doc
8. IEEE. (2002). Draft standard for learning object metadata (proposed standard). Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM- 1484-12-1-v1-F inal-Draft.pdf
9. Jonassen, D., & Churchill, D. (2004). Is there a learning orientation in learning objects? International Journal on E-Learning, 3(2), 32-41.
10. Jones, J., & McNaught, C. (2005). Using learning object evaluation: Challenges and lessons learned in the Hong Kong context. In G. Richards & P. Kommers (Eds.). ED-MEDIA 2005 (pp. 3580-3585), Proceedings of the 17th annual World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal, Canada, 27 June - 2 July. Norfolk VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
11. Kennedy, D. M. (2004). Continuous refinement of reusable learning objects: The case of the Interactive Graphing Object. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.). ED-MEDIA 2004 (pp. 1398-1404). Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland: Norfolk VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
12. th World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia and World Conference on Educational Telecommunications, Freiburg, Germany, 20-25 June. Charlottesville: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education (AACE).
13. Kennedy, D. M., McNaught, C., & Fritze, P. (2004). Conceptual tools for designing and learning. In P. Kommers (Ed.). Cognitive support for learning: Imagining the unknown (pp. 141-154). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
14. st annual Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education 2004 conference, University of Western Australia, 5-8 December. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ conferences/perth04/procs/k ennedy.html
15. Khoo, M. (2001). Community design of DLESE's collections review policy: A technological frames analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 157-164). Roanoke, Virginia, US. New York: ACM Press. February 7, 2006 via http://portal.acm.org/dl.cfm
16. Koppi, T., Bogle, L. & Lavitt, N. (2004). Institutional use of learning objects: Lessons learned and future directions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 449-463.
17. th Annual World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Tampere, Finland, 25-30 June. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education (AACE).
18. Laurillard, D., & McAndrew, P. (2003). Reuseable educational software: A basis for generic learning activities. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.). Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning (pp. 81-93). London: Kogan Page.
19. Littlejohn, A. (Ed.) (2003). Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to eLearning. London: Kogan Page.
20. Lynch, C. (2002). Digital collections, digital libraries and the digitization of cultural heritage information. First Monday, 7(5). Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7-5/lynch/index.ht ml
21. Marlino, M., & Sumner, T. (2001). The digital library for earth system education: Building community, building the library. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 80-81). Houston, Texas. New York: ACM Press. Retrieved February 7, 2006, via http://portal.acm. org/dl.cfm (Pubitemid 33627334)
22. McNaught, C. (2006). The synergy between information literacy and eLearning. In H. S. Ching, P. W. T. Poon & C. McNaught (Eds.). eLearning and digital publishing (pp. 29-43). Dordrecht: Springer.
23. Parrish, P. E. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(1), 49-67.
24. Siemens, G. (2003). The whole picture of eLearning. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/wholepicture.htm
25. Sumner, T., Khoo, M., Recker, M., & Marlino, M. (2003). Understanding educator perceptions of 'quality' in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 269-279). Houston, Texas, US. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. Retrieved February 7, 2006, via http://portal.acm.org/dl.cfm
26. Sumner, T., & Marlino, M. (2004). Digital libraries and educational practice: A case for new models. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents (pp. 170-178). Tuscon, AZ, US. New York: ACM Press. Retrieved February 7, 2006, via http://portal.acm.org/dl. cfm
27. Wiley, D. A. (2002). Learning objects. A definition. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
28. Wiley, D. A. (2003). Learning objects: Difficulties and opportunities. Academic ADL Co-Lab News Report: No. 152-030406. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/lo-do.pdf
29. Wegner, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wright, M., Marlino, M., & Sumner, T. (2002). Meta-design of a community digital library. D-Lib Magazine, 8(5). Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may02/wright/05wright.html
31. All in-text URLs accessed on 7 February 2006.