Publish or perish: A limited author analysis of ICA and NCA journals

Journal of Communication

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 703-720

  Bunz, Ulla ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PUBLISHING;

EID: 31044445977     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/55.4.703     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Barker, L., Ray, V. O., Watson, K. W., & Hall, R. N. (1988). An investigation of the quantity of articles produced in the communication discipline: An institutional analysis on the basis of highest degree conferred, part III. ACA Bulletin, 65, 31-38.
3. Blair, C., Brown, J. R., & Baxter, L. A. (1994). Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 383-409.
4. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
5. Cooper, P. J., Stewart, L. P., & Friedley, S. A. (1989). Twenty years of research by and about women in major communication journals: 1967-1986. ACA Bulletin, 67, 46-61.
6. Edwards, R., & Barker, L. (1983) Perceptions of highly regarded doctoral programs in selected areas of speech communication. Communication Education, 32, 63-68.
7. Erickson, K. V., Fleuriet, C. A., & Hosman, L. A. (1996). Scholars and pub-junkies: Perspectives on academic publishing. Southern Communication Journal, 61, 271-276.
8. Funkhouser, E. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574.
9. Hickson, M., III, Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1989) An analysis of prolific scholarship in speech communication, 1915-1985: Toward a yardstick for measuring research productivity. Communication Education, 38, 230-236.
10. Hickson, M., III, Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1992). Active prolific female scholars in communication: An analysis of research producttvity, II. Communication Quarterly, 4, 350-356.
11. Hickson, M., III, Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1993) Active prolific scholars in communication studies: Analysis of research productivity, II. Communication Education, 42, 224-233.
12. Hickson, M., III, Stacks, D. W., & Bodon, J. (1999). The status of research productivity in communication: 1915-1995. Communication Monographs, 66, 178-197.
13. National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Begin your college search by selecting criteria in the form below. Retrieved June 7, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cool/
14. Rosenfeld, L. B., & Long, B. W. (1992). An evaluation system for measuring faculty performance. ACA Bulletin, 79, 36-44.
15. Soley, L. C., & Reid, L. N. (1983). Advertising article productivity of the U.S. academic community. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 464-469, 542.
16. Stacks, D. W., Rosenfeld, L. B., & Hickson, M., III. (1989). Perceptions of regional communication associations. Communication Education, 38, 144-150.
17. Stephen, T. (1999). Computer assisted concept analysis of HCR's first 25 years. Human Communication Research, 25, 498-513.
18. Stephen, T. (2000). Concept analysis of gender, feminist, and women's studies research in the communication literature. Communication Monographs, 67, 193-214.
19. U.S. Department of Education (n.d.). General information survey and integrated postsecondary education data system. Retrieved June 7, 2004, from http://www.natcom.org/ComProg/Stats/earned.htm
20. Vincent, R. C. (1984). Broadcast research productivity of U.S. communication programs, 1976-1983. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 841-846.