Growth and survival differences of vibrio vulnificus and vibrio parahaemolyticus strains during cold storage

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Burnham, V E ^a   Janes, M E ^a   Jakus, L A ^b   Supan, J ^a   Depaola, A ^c   Bell, J ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cold storage; Strains; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Vibrio vulnificus

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; FOOD CONTROL; FREEZING; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; OYSTER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEA FOOD; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TIME; VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS; VIBRIO VULNIFICUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; OSTREIDAE; REFRIGERATION; SEAFOOD; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS; VIBRIO VULNIFICUS;

VIBRIO; VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS; VIBRIO VULNIFICUS;

EID: 70350166217     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01227.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bang W, Drake MA, Jaykus LA. 2007. Recovery and detection of Vibrio vulnificus during cold storage. FoodMicrobiol 24:664-670.
2. Bates TC, Oliver JD. 2004. The viable but nonculturable state of Kanagawa positive and negative strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Microbiol 42:74-79.
3. Beuchat LR. 1975. Environmental factors affecting survival and growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Review 38:476-480.
4. Bogosian G, Aardema ND, Bourneuf EV,Morris PJL, O'Neil J. 2000. Recovery of hydrogen peroxide-sensitive culturable cells of Vibrio vulnificus gives the appearance of resuscitation from a viable but nonculturable state. J Bacteriol 182:5070-5075.
5. CDC. 2006. Preliminary Food Net data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food-10 States, United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55(14):392-395.
6. Cook DW, Ruple A. 1989. Indicator bacteria and Vibrionaceae multiplication in postharvest shellstock oysters. J Food Prot 52:343-349.
7. Cook DW, Ruple AD. 1992. Cold storage and mild heat treatment as processing aids to reduce the numbers of Vibrio vulnificus in raw oysters. J Food Prot 55:985-989.
8. Daniels NA, Ray B, Easton A,Marano N, Kahn E,McShan AL, DelRosario L, Baldwin T, Kingley MA, Puhr ND, Wells JG, Angulo FJ. 2000. Emergence of a new Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype in raw oysters: a prevention quandary. JAMA 284:1541-1545.
9. Gooch JA, DePaola A, Kaysner CA,Marshall DL. 2002. Evaluation of two direct plating methods using nonradioactive probes for enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:721-724.
10. HladyWG. 1997. Vibrio infections associated with raw oyster consumption in Florida, 1981-1994. J Food Prot 60:353-357.
11. Johnston MD, Brown MH. 2002. An investigation into the changed physiological state of Vibrio bacteria as a survival mechanism in response to cold temperatures and studies on their sensitivity to heating and freezing. J ApplMicrobiol 92:1066-1077.
12. Kaysner CA, TamplinM,WekellM, Scott R, Colburn K. 1989. Survival of Vibrio vulnificus in shellstock and shucked oysters (Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea virginica) and effects of isolation medium on recovery. Appl EnvironMicrobiol 55:3072-3079.
13. Kumamoto KS, Vulich DJ. 1998. Clinical infections of Vibrio vulnificus: a case report and review of the literature. J EmergMed 16:61-66.
14. McGovern VP, Oliver JD. 1995. Induction of cold-responsive proteins in Vibrio vulnificus. J Bacteriol 177:4131-4133.
15. Miles DW, Ross T, Olley J,McMeekin TA. 1997. Development and evaluation of a predictive model for the effect of temperature and water activity on the growth rate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Int J FoodMicrobiol 38:133-142. (Pubitemid 28056950)
16. Motes ML, DePaola A, Cook DW, Veazey JE, Hunsucker JC, Blodgett RJ, Chirtel SJ. 1998. Influence of water temperature and salinity on Vibrio vulnificus in northern Gulf and Atlantic Coast oysters. Appl EnvironMicrobiol 64:1459-1465.
17. Oliver JD. 1993. Formation of viable but nonculturable cells. In: Kjelleberg S, editor. Starvation in bacteria. New York: Plenum Press. p 239-272.
18. Oliver JD, Nilsson L, Kjelleberg S. 1991. Formation of nonculturable Vibrio vulnificus cells and its relationship to the starvation state. Appl EnvironMicorbiol 57:2640-2644.
19. RandaMA, Polz MF, Lim E. 2004. Effects of temperature and salinity on Vibrio vulnificus population dynamics as assessed by quantitative PCR. Appl Environ Micorbiol 70:5469-5476.
20. Su, Yi-Cheng, Liu C. 2007. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a concern of seafood safety. Food Microbiol 24:549-558.
21. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2003. National Shellfish Sanitation Program. Guide for the control of molluscan shellfish. Washington, D.C.: Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2005. Quantitative risk assessment on the public health impact of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw oysters. Washington, D.C.: Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
23. Warner JM,Oliver JD. 1998. Randomly amplified PolymorphicDNAanalysis of starved and viable nonculturable Vibrio vulnificus cells. Appl EnvironMicrobiol 64:3025-3028.
24. Wong HC, Liu SH, Wang TK, Lee CL, Chiou CS, Liu DP, Nishibuchi M, Lee BK. 2000. Characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 from Asia. Appl Environ Micorbiol 66:3981-3986.
25. Yeung PS,HayesMC, DePaola A, Kaysner CA, Kornstein L, Boor KJ. 2002. Comparative phenotypic, molecular, and virulence characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 isolates. Appl EnvironMicorbiol 68:2901-2909