Image Analysis of Representative Food Structures: Application of the bootstrap method

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Ramírez, Cristian ^a   Germain, Juan C ^a   Aguilera, José M ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Image analysis,Microscopy; Microstructure; Representative elementary area; Sampling; Size distribution

Indexed keywords

APPLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; FOOD ANALYSIS; FRUIT; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOOD ANALYSIS; FRUIT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALUS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 70350146785     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01220.x     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Aguilera JM. 2005. Why food microstructure? J Food Eng 67:3-11
2. Aguilera JM, Germain JC. 2007. Advances in image analysis for the study of food microstructure. In: McClements DJ, editor. Understanding and controlling the microstructure of complex foods. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd. p 261-287
3. Aguilera JM, Lillford PJ. 2008. Structure-property relationships in foods. In: Aguilera JM, Lillford PJ, editors. Food materials science: principles and practice. New York: Springer Publisher. p 229-253
4. Brunnschweiler J, Mang D, Farah Z, Escher F, Conde-Petit B. 2006. Structure-texture relationships of fresh pastes prepared from different yam (Dioscorea spp.) varieties. LWT Food Sci Technol 39:762-769
5. Efron B, Tibshirani R. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
6. Graham S, Yang N. 2003. Representative volumes of material based on microstructural statistics. ScrMater 48:269-274
7. Kaláb M, Allan-Wojtas P, Miller SS. 1995. Microscopy and other imaging techniques in food structure analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 6:177-186
8. Lee SK, Buwalda RJ, Euston SR, Foegeding EA, McKenna AB. 2003. Changes in the rheology and microstructure of processed cheese during cooking. LWT Food Sci Technol 36:339-345
9. Lewicki PP, Pawlak G. 2003. Effect of drying on microstructure of plant tisuue. Drying Technol 21:657-683
10. Lim KS, Barigou M. 2004. X-ray micro-computed tomography of cellular food products. Food Res Int 37:1001-1012
11. Martin M, Sagalowicz L. 2008. Probing food structure. In: Aguilera JM, Lillford PJ, editors. Food materials science: principles and practice. New York: Springer Publisher. p 203-226
12. Mebatsion HK, Verboven P, Ho QT, Verlinden BE, Nicolai BM. 2008. Modelling fruit (micro) structures, why and how? Trends Food Sci Technol 19:59-66.
13. Mellema M, Heesakkers JWM, van Opheusden JHJ, van Vliet T. 2000. Structure and scaling behavior of aging rennet-induced casein gels examined by confocal microscopy and permeametry. Langmuir 16:6847-6854
14. Pajevic S, Basser PJ. 2003. Parametric and non-parametric statistical analysis of DTMRI data. JMagn Reson 161:1-14.
15. Wang C, Zuo Q, Zhang R. 2008. Estimating the necessary sampling size of surface soil moisture at different scales using a random combination method. J Hydrol 352:309-321
16. Zheng CX, Sun DW, Zheng LY. 2006. Recent applications of image texture for evaluation of food qualities: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 17:113-128