The development of public perception research in the genomics field: An empirical analysis of the literature in the field

Science Communication

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 57-83

  Pin, Renske R ^a   Gutteling, Jan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Development; Empirical content analysis; Genomics; Public perception; Scientific literature

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350134442     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547008327273     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bauer, M.W. (2005). Distinguishing red and green biotechnology: Cultivation effects of the elite press. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), 63-89.
2. Bauer, M.W., & Gutteling, J. (2006). Issues Salience and Media Framing over 30 Years. In G. Gaskell & M. W. Bauer (Eds.), Genomics and society: legal, ethical, and social dimensions (pp. 113-130). London: Earthscan.
3. Collins, F.S., Morgan, M., & Patrinos, A. (2003). The human genome project: Lessons from large-scale biology. Science, 300(5617), 286-290.
4. Condit, C. (2001). What is public opinion about genetics? Nature Reviews Genetics, 2(10), 811-815.
5. Finucane, M.L., & Holup, J.L. (2005). Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 60(7), 1603-1612.
6. Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997). Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit, and ethics. Science Technology & Human Values, 22(1), 98-124.
7. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Bauer, M., Durant, J., Allansdottir, A., Bonfadelli, H.,et al.(2000). Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnology, 18(9), 935-938.
8. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Torgersen, H., Hampel, J.,et al.(2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 185-194.
9. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Wagner, W., Nielsen, T.H., Jelsoe, E., Kohring, M.,et al.(2001). In the public eye: Representations of biotechnology in Europe. In G. Gaskell & M. Bauer (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-2000: The years of controversy (pp. 53-79). London: NMSI Trading Ltd, Science Museum.
10. Gaskell, G., & Bauer, M.(2001). Biotechnology in the years of controversy: a social scientific perspective. In G. Gaskell & M. Bauer (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy (pp. 3-11). London: NMSI Trading Ltd, Science Museum.
11. Gaskell, G., Einsiedel, E., Priest, S., Ten Eyck, T., Allum, N., & Torgerson, H., (2001). Troubled waters: the Atlantic divide on biotechnology policy. In G. Gaskell & M. Bauer (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-2000: The years of controversy (pp. 96-115). London: NMSI Trading Ltd, Science Museum.
12. Grunert, K.G. (2002). Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 13(8), 275-285.
13. Gurabardhi, Z., Gutteling, J.M., & Kuttschreuter, M. (2004). The development of risk communication. Science Communication, 25(4), 323-349.
14. Lusk, J.L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., & Taulman, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30(1), 28-44.
15. McComas, K.A. (2006). Defining moments in risk communication research: 1996-2005. Journal Of Health Communication, 11(1), 75-91.
16. Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J.C.M., Renes, R.J., & Frewer, L.J. (2007). Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite, 49(1), 1-17.
17. Verdurme, A., & Viaene, J. (2001). Consumer attitudes towards GM food: Literature review and recommendations for effective communication. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 13(2-3), 77-98.
18. Zwier, S., Beentjes, H., & Gutteling, J. (2006). Communicatiewetenschappelijk onderzoek in de afgelopen 15 jaar: aard en positie. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 34(3), 220-231.