Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 96, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1129-1134

  Nocito, A ^a   Wildi, S ^a   Rufibach, K ^b   Clavien, P A ^a   Weber, M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c Hospital of Schaffhausen   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CEPHALIC VEIN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PNEUMOTHORAX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN; SURGEON; TOTALLY IMPLANTABLE VENOUS ACCESS PORT PLACEMENT; VASCULAR ACCESS; VEIN PUNCTURE; VEIN SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VEINS; VENOUS CUTDOWN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350121947     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6730     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 1982; 92: 706-712.
2. Bow EJ, Kilpatrick MG, Clinch JJ. Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: a randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1267.
3. Silver DF, Hempling RE, Recio FO, Piver MS, Eltabbakh GH. Complications related to indwelling caval catheters on a gynecologic oncology service. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 70: 329-333.
4. Povoski SP. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 496-502.
5. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol 1953; 39: 368-376.
6. Kurul S, Saip P, Aydin T. Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 684-692. (Pubitemid 35314912)
7. Ballarini C, Intra M, Pisani Ceretti A, Cordovana A, Pagani M, Farina G et al. Complications of subcutaneous infusion port in the general oncology population. Oncology 1999; 56: 97-102. (Pubitemid 29080617)
8. Biffi R, de Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Mauri S, Goldhirsch A et al. Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 767-773. (Pubitemid 28394164)
9. Damascelli B, Patelli G, Frigerio LF, Lanocita R, Garbagnati F, Marchianò A et al. Placement of long-term central venous catheters in outpatients: study of 134 patients over 24 596 catheter days. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 1235-1239. (Pubitemid 27183802)
10. Eastridge BJ, Lefor AT. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 233-238.
11. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW. Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg 1998; 22: 12-16. (Pubitemid 28027994)
12. Di Carlo I, Cordio S, La Greca G, Privitera G, Russello D, Puleo S et al. Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 1050-1053. (Pubitemid 32982996)
13. Minassian VA, Sood AK, Lowe P, Sorosky JI, Al-Jurf AS, Buller RE. Longterm central venous access in gynecologic cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 403-409. (Pubitemid 30757692)
14. Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C,Weiss HD. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 24: 180-184. (Pubitemid 32587872)
15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213. (Pubitemid 38963009)
16. Fischer L, Knebel P, Schröder S, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Hennes R et al. Reasons for explantation of totally implantable access ports: a multivariate analysis of 385 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 1124-1129.
17. Shetty PC, Mody MK, Kastan DJ, Sharma RP, Burke MW, Venugopal C et al. Outcome of 350 implanted chest ports placed by interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8: 991-995. (Pubitemid 27500436)
18. Kluge A, Stroh H, Wagner D, Rauber K. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results.] Rofo 1998; 169: 63-67.
19. Morris SL, Jaques PF, Mauro MA. Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access. Radiology 1992; 184: 149-151.
20. Au FC. The anatomy of the cephalic vein. Am Surg 1989; 55: 638-639.
21. Davis SJ, Thompson JS, Edney JA. Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques. Am Surg 1984; 50: 673-676.
22. Le Saout J, Vallee B, Person H, Doutriaux M, Blanc J, Nguyen H. [Anatomical basis for the surgical use of the cephalic vein (V. Cephalica). 74 anatomical dissections. 189 surgical dissections.] J Chir (Paris) 1983; 120: 131-134.
23. Knebel P, Fischer L, Huesing J, Hennes R, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Randomized clinical trial of a modified Seldinger technique for open central venous cannulation for implantable access devices. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 159-165.
24. Perry EP, Nash JR, Klidjian AM. Direct cephalic vein cannulation for safe subclavian access. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1990; 35: 218-220.
25. Seiler CM, Frohlich BE, Dorsam UJ, Kienle P, Buchler MW, Knaebel HP. Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement: a multivariate analysis of 400 patients. J Surg Oncol 2006; 93: 24-29. (Pubitemid 43038422)
26. Mustafa S, Stein PD, Patel KC, Otten TR, Holmes R, Silbergleit A. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. Chest 2003; 123: 1953-1956.
27. Harada Y, Katsume A, Kimata M, Hikosaka T, Yamanaka S, Akashi K et al. Placement of pacemaker leads via the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by fluoroscopy and venography in the oblique projection. Heart Vessels 2005; 20: 19-22. (Pubitemid 40260302)
28. Tse HF, Lau CP, Leung SK. A cephalic vein cutdown and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24: 469-473.
29. Estes JM, Rocconi R, Straughn JM, Bhoola S, Leath CA, Alvarez RD et al. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 591-595. (Pubitemid 38388156)