Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement: A multivariate analysis of 400 patients

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 24-29

  Seiler, Christoph M ^a   Frohlich, Boris E ^a   Dorsam, Ulrich J ^a   Kienle, Peter ^a   Buchler, Markus W ^a   Knaebel, Hanns Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central venous ports; Multivariate analysis; Seldinger technique; Surgical implantation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTALLY IMPLANTABLE ACCESS PORT; TREATMENT FAILURE;

AGED; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; BRACHIAL PLEXUS NEUROPATHIES; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; COHORT STUDIES; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMANS; INFUSION PUMPS, IMPLANTABLE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN DISEASES, VASCULAR; VENOUS CUTDOWN;

EID: 29844453472     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.20410     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Broviac JW, Cole JJ, Scribner BH: A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973;136:602-606.
2. Hickman RO, Buckner CD, Clift RA, et al.: A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979;148:871-875.
3. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, et al.: Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 1982;92:706-712.
4. Biffi R, De Braud F, Orsi F, et al.: A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients. Cancer 2001;92: 1204-1212.
5. Knaebel HP, Marten A, Schmidt J, et al.: Phase III trial of postoperative cisplatin, interferon alpha-2b, and 5-FU combined with external radiation treatment versus 5-FU alone for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma-CapRI: Study protocol [ISRCTN62866759]. BMC Cancer 2005;5:37.
6. Le Saout J, Vallee B, Person H, et al.: Anatomical basis for the surgical use of the cephalic vein (V. Cephalica). 74 anatomical dissections. 189 surgical dissections. J. Chir (Paris) 1983;120: 131-134.
7. Coit DG, Turnbull AD: A safe technique for the placement of implantable vascular access devices in patients with thrombocytopenia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;167:429-431.
8. Davis SJ, Thompson JS, Edney JA: Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques. Am Surg 1984;50:673-676.
9. Chuter T, Starker PM: Placement of Hickman-Broviac catheters in the cephalic vein. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;166:163-164.
10. Perry EP, Nash JR, Klidjian AM: Direct cephalic vein cannulation for safe subclavian access. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1990;35:218-220.
11. Torramade JR, Cienfuegos JA, Hernandez JL, et al.: The complications of central venous access systems: A study of 218 patients. Eur J Surg 1993;159:323-327.
12. Gallichio MH, Kahn D, Lempert N, et al.: Placement of a double lumen silastic catheter for hemodialysis access through the cephalic vein. J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:171-172.
13. Povoski SP: A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:496-502.
14. Di Carlo I, Cordio S, La Greca G, et al.: Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: A retrospective study on early and late complications. Arch Surg 2001;136:1050-1053.
15. Morris SL, Jaques PF, Mauro MA: Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access. Radiology 1992;184:149-151.
16. Shetty PC, Mody MK, Kastan DJ, et al.: Outcome of 350 implanted chest ports placed by interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997;8:991-995.
17. Simpson KR, Hovsepian DM, Picus D: Interventional radiologic placement of chest wall ports: Results and complications in 161 consecutive placements. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997;8:189-195.
18. Kluge A, Stroh H, Wagner D, et al.: The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: The complications and long-term results. Rofo 1998;169:63-67.
19. Lyon RD, Griggs KA, Johnson AM, et al.: Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999;10:463-471.
20. Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C, et al.: Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: Experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001;24:180-184.
21. Au FC: The anatomy of the cephalic vein. Am Surg 1989;55:638-639.