Crossing boundaries and initiating conversations about rti: Understanding and applying differentiated classroom instruction

Reading Teacher

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 84-87

  Walker Dalhouse, Doris ^e   Risko, Victoria J ^d   Esworthy, With Cathy ^a   Grasley, Ellen ^b   Kaisler, Gina ^b   Mcllvain, Dona ^c   Stephan, Mary ^b  

^a Crockett Elementary School   (United States)

^b Elm Creative Arts Elementary School   (United States)

^c Edmondson Elementary School   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350089996     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.63.1.9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allen, L. (1998). An integrated strategies approach: Making word identification instruction work for beginning readers. The Reading Teacher, 52 (3), 254-268.
2. Allington, R. L. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. White Plains, NY: Longman/Pearson.
3. Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42 (1), 85-95. doi:10.1177/0022219408326214
4. Clay, M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Plymouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Diller, D. (2005). Practice with purpose: Literacy work stations for grades 3-6. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
6. Drame, E. R., & Xu, Y. (2008). Examining sociocultural factors in response to intervention models. Childhood Education, 85 (1), 26-32.
7. Gravois, T. A., & Rosenfield, S. A. (2006). Impact of instructional consultation teams on the disproportionate referral and placement of minority students in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 27 (1), 42-52. doi:10.1177/074193250602700 10501
8. Haager, D., & Mahdavi, J. (2007). Teacher roles in implementing interventions. In D. Haager, J. Klingner, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 245-264). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-466.
10. International Reading Association. (2002). What is evidencebased reading instruction? (Position statement). Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved March 29, 2009, from www.reading.org/Libraries/Position-Statements-and-Resolutions/psl055- evidence-based.sflb.ashx
11. International Reading Association Commission on RTI. (2009). Working draft of guiding principles. Retrieved March 29, 2009, from www.reading.org/ General/Publications/ReadingToday/RTY-0902-rti.aspx
12. Literacy Collaborative. (2009). Research of program effectiveness. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from www.literacycollaborative.org/research/findings/
13. Mcintosh, A. S., Graves, A., & Gersten, R. (2007). The effects of response to intervention on literacy development in multiplelanguage settings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 50 (3), 197-212.
14. O'Connor, E. A., & Simic, O. (2002). The effect of Reading Recovery on special education referrals and placements. Psychology in the Schools, 39 (6), 635-646. doi:10.1002/pits.l0061
15. Reading Recovery Council of North America. (2009). Reading Recovery and IDEA legislation: Early Intervening Service (EIS) and Response to Intervention (RTI). Retrieved March 29, 2009, from www.readingrecovery.org/pdf/reading- recovery/SPED-Brief-07.pdf
16. Richards, C, Pavri, S., Golez, F., Canges, R., & Murphy, J. (2007). Response to intervention: Building the capacity of teachers to serve students with learning difficulties. Issues in Teacher Education, 16 (2), 55-64.
17. Tobin, R. (2008). Conundrums in the differentiated literacy classroom. Reading Improvement, 45 (4), 159-169.
18. Wright Group. (2008). On-the-mark assessment kit. Desoto, TX: Wright/Pearson.
19. Xu, Y., & Drame, E. (2008). Culturally appropriate context: Unlocking the potential of response to intervention for English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35 (4), 305-311. doi:10.1007/sl0643-007-0213-4