New views on north-south relations of imperialism

Handbook of Globalization, Governance, and Public Administration

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 759-797

  Kelly, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350011185     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Aronowitz, S. (2003). The New World Order. In Balakrishnan, G. (Ed.), Debating Empire. London: Verso, pp. 19-25.
2. Albo, G. (2004). The Old and New Economics of Imperialism. In Panitch, L. and Leys, C. (Eds.), Socialist Register 2004: The New Imperial Challenge. London: The Merlin Press Ltd., pp. 88-113.
3. Arrighi, G. (2001). Global Capitalism and the Persistence of the North-South Divide. Science and Society 65: 469-476.
4. Arrighi, G. (2003). Lineages of Empire. In Balakrishnan, G. (Ed.), Debating Empire. London: Verso, pp. 29-42.
5. Balogh, T.P. (1972). The Mechanism of Neo-Imperialism. In Boulding, K.E. and Mukerjee, T. (Eds.), Economic Imperialism: A Book of Readings. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 275-294.
6. Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. (2002). Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31: 109-127.
7. Bartolovich, C. (2003). Post-Imperialism or New Imperialism? The Eleventh September of George Bush: Fortress U.S. and the Global Politics of Consumption. Interventions 5: 177-199.
8. Berberolgu, B. (2003). Globalization of Capital and the Nation-State: Imperialism, Class Struggle, and the State in the Age of Global Capitalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
9. Biersteker, T. J. (1990). Reducing the Role of the State in the Economy: A Conceptual Exploration of IMF and World Bank Prescriptions. International Studies Quarterly 34: 477-492.
10. Block, F. (2003). The Global Economy in the Bush Era. Socio-Economic Review1: 439-456.
11. Blomstrom, M. and Hettne, B. (1984). Development Theory in Transition: The Dependency Debate and Beyond. London: Zed Books.
12. Burbach, R. and Robinson, W.I. (1999). The fin de siecle debate: Globalization as Epochal Shift. Science and Society 63: 10-39.
13. Callinicos, A. (2002). The Actuality of Imperialism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31: 319-326.
14. Cavarozzi, M.J. and Petras, J.F. (1974). Chile. In Chilcote, R.H. and Edelstein, J.C. (Eds.), Latin America: The Struggle with Dependency and Beyond. New York: John Wiley, pp. 495-578.
15. Chatterjee, S., Prakash, B., and Tabor, S.R. (2004). Income, Poverty and Hunger in Asia: The Role of Information. International Conference on Agriculture Statistics (ICAS III), Cancun, QR, Mexico.
16. Chilcote, R.H. (2002). Globalism or Imperialism? Latin American Perspectives29: 80-84.
17. Dorosh, P.A. (2001). Trade Liberalization and National Food Security: Rice Trade between Bangladesh and India. World Development 19: 673-689.
18. Dos Santos, T. (1970). The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review60: 231-236.
19. Dos Santos, T. (1974). Brazil: The Origins of a Crisis. In Chilcote, R.H. and Edelstein, J.C. (Eds.), Latin America: The Struggle with Dependency and Beyond. New York: John Wiley, pp. 415-490.
20. Ellner, S. (2002). The ‘‘Radical’’ Thesis on Globalization and the Case of Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez. Latin American Perspectives 29: 88-93.
21. Evans, P.B. (1985). Transnational Linkages and the Economic Role of the State: An Analysis of Developing and Industrialized Nations in the Post-World War II Period. In Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (Eds.), Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192-226.
22. Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (Eds.) (1985). Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and Public Administration. Public Administration Review 59: 509-522.
24. Foster, J.B. (2002). The Rediscovery of Imperialism. Monthly Review 54: 1-16.
25. Foster, J.B. (2003). The New Age of Imperialism. Monthly Review 55: 1-14.
26. Frank, A.G. (1970). On the Mechanisms of Imperialism: The Case of Brazil. In Rhodes, R.I. (Ed.), Imperialism and Underdevelopment: A Reader. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 89-100.
27. Frank, A.G. (1972). Lumpenbourgeoisie: Lumpendevelopment: Dependence, Class, and Politics in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
28. Galeano, E. (1973). Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent. New York: Monthly Review Press.
29. Galtung, J. (1971). A Structural Theory of Imperialism. Journal of Peace Research. 8: 81-117.
30. George, S. (1992). The Debt Boomerang: How Third World Debt Harms Us All. London: Pluto Press.
31. Goulet, D. and Hudson, M. (1971). The Myth of Aid: The Hidden Agenda of the Development Reports. New York: IDOC North America.
32. Gowan, P. (2003). U.S. Hegemony Today. Monthly Review 5: 30-50.
33. Grant, J., Hoorens, S., Sivadasan, S., van het Loo, M., DaVanzo, J., Hale, L., Gibson, S., and Butz, W. (2004). Low Fertility and Population Ageing: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Options. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
34. Guillen, M.F. (2001). Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature. Annual Review of Sociology27: 235-260.
35. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Harris, R.L. (2002). Globalization and Globalism in Latin America: Contending Perspectives. Latin American Perspectives 29: 5-23.
37. Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Hoogvelt, A. (2001). Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of Development. 2nd Edn. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. Howard, M.C. and King, J.E. (2000). Whatever Happened to Imperialism? In Chil-cote, R.H. (Ed.), The Political Economy of Imperialism: Critical Appraisals. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 19-40.
40. Jonas, S. (1974). Guatemala: Land of Eternal Struggle. In Chilcote, R.H. and Edelstein, J.C. (Eds.), Latin America: the Struggle with Dependency and Beyond. New York: John Wiley, pp. 93-219.
41. Klare, M. (2003). The New Geopolitics. Monthly Review 5: 51-56.
42. Kleinknecht, A. and ter Wegnel, J. (1998). The Myth of Economic Globalization. Cambridge Journal of Economics 22: 637-647.
43. Loayza, N.V., Lopez, H., and Ubide, A. (2001). Comovement and Macroeconomic Interdependence: Evidence from Latin America, East Asia, and Europe. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 48: 367-396.
44. Mann, M. (2001). Globalization is (Among Other Things) Transnational, International, and American. Science and Society 65: 464-469.
45. McMichael, P. (1995). The New Colonialism: Global regulation and the Restructuring of the Interstate System. In Smith, D.A. and Borocz, J. (Eds.), A New World Order? Global Transformations in the Late Twentieth Century. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp. 37-55.
46. McMichael, P. (1998). Global Food Politics. Monthly Review 50: 97-111.
47. Moore, J.W. (2001). Capital, Territory, and Hegemony Over the Longue Duree. Science and Society. 65: 476-484.
48. Munkirs, J.R. (1985). The Transformation of American Capitalism: From Competitive Market Structures to Centralized Private Sector Planning. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
49. Neale, W.C. (1988). Institutions. In Tool, M.R. (Ed.), Evolutionary Economics, Vol. I: Foundations of Institutionalist Thought. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
50. Oxfam (1996). Trade Liberalisation as a Threat to Livelihoods: The Corn Sector in the Philippines. Oxford, England: Oxfam.
51. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1991). Large Firms in the Production of the World’s Technology: An Important Vase of Non-Globalisation. Journal of International Business Studies 22: 1-21.
52. Payer, C. (1974). The Debt Trap: The International Monetary Fund and the Third World. New York: Monthly Review Press.
53. Petras, J. (2000). Globalization: A Critical Analysis. In Chilcote, R.H. (Ed.), The Political Economy of Imperialism: Critical Appraisals. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 181-213.
54. Petras, J. (2002a). The Myth of the Third Scientific-Technological Revolution in the Era of Neo-Mercantilist Empires. Latin American Perspectives 29: 44-58.
55. Petras, J. (2002b). A Rose by Any Other Name? The Fragrance of Imperialism. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 29: 135-160.
56. Petras, J. and Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century. London: Zed Books Ltd.
57. Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development ofLatin America and Its Principle Problems. New York: United Nations.
58. Robinson, W.I. (1995). Transnational Politics and Global Social Order: A Reassessment of the Chilean Transition in Light of U.S. Intervention. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 24: 1-30.
59. Robinson, W.I. (1996). Globalization: Nine Theses on Our Epoch. Race and Class. 38: 13-31.
60. Robinson, W.I. (1998). Beyond Nation-State Paradigms: Globalization, Sociology, and the Challenge of Transnational Studies. Sociological Forum 13: 561-594.
61. Robinson, W.I. (2001). Global Capitalism and Nation-State-Centric Thinking — What We Don’t See When We Do See Nation-States: Response to Critics. Science and Society 65: 500-508.
62. Robinson, W.I. (2002a). Globalization as a Macro-Structural-Historical Framework of Analysis: The Case of Central America. New Political Economy 7: 221-250.
63. Robinson, W.I. (2002b). Remapping Development in Light of Globalization: From a Territorial to a Social Cartography. Third World Quarterly 23: 1047-1071.
64. Robinson, W.I. (2004). A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in a Transnational World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65. Robinson, W.I. and Harris, J. (2000). Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science and Society 64: 11-54.
66. Ruigrok, W. and van Tulder, R. (1995). The Logic of International Restructuring. London: Routledge.
67. Sallnow, J. (1990). Is It Aid or Is It Neocolonialism? Economic Geography 62: 30-35.
68. Sassen, S. (1996). Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
69. Sassen, S. (1999). Making the Global Economy Run: The Role of Nation States and Private Agents. International Social Science Journal 161: 409-416.
70. Sklair, L. (2002). Globalization: Capitalism & Its Alternatives. 3rd Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Stiglitz, J.E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
72. Tabb, W.K. (1997). Globalization is an Issue, the Power of Capital is the Issue. Monthly Review 49: 20-30.
73. Turner, T. (1980). Nigeria: Imperialism, Oil Technology, and the Comprador State. In Nore, P. and Turner, T. (Eds.), Oil and Class Struggle. London: Zed Press, pp. 119-223.
74. Van der Pijl, K. (2001). Globalization or Class Society in Transition? Science and Society 65: 492-500.
75. Veblen, T. (1904). The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
76. Vilas, C.M. (2002). Globalism or Imperialism? Latin American Perspectives 29: 70-79.
77. Wade, R. (1996). Globalization and Its Limits: Reports of the Death of the National Economy are Greatly Exaggerated. In Berger, S. and Dore, R. (Eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 60-88.
78. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Rise and Future Demise of the World-Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16: 387-415.
79. Wallerstein, I. (2003). U.S. Weakness and the Struggle for Hegemony. Monthly Review 55: 23-29.
80. Weiss, L. (1997). Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State. New Left Review225: 3-27.
81. Went, R. (1996). Globalization: Myths, Reality, and Ideology. International Journal of Political Economy 26: 39-59.
82. Went, R. (2001). Globalization: Towards a Transnational State? A Skeptical Note. Science and Society 65: 484-491.
83. World Bank (2004). Steering a Steady Course. Special Focus: Strengthening the Investment Climate in East Asia. New York: World Bank.