Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature

Annual Review of Sociology

Volumn 27, Issue , 2001, Pages 235-260

  Guillén, Mauro E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Convergence; Global culture; Modernity; Nation state

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035617478     PISSN: 03600572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.235     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Albrow M. 1997. The Global Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
2. Appadurai A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
3. Baldwin RE, Martin P. 1999. Two waves of globalization: superficial similarities, fundamental differences. NBER Work. Pap. Ser. 6904. Cambridge, MA: Natl. Bur Econ. Res.
4. Bell D. [1973] 1976. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books
5. Berger S. 1996. Introduction. In National Diversity and Global Capitalism, ed. S Berger, R Dore, pp. 1-25. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
6. Zelizer VA. 1999. Multiple markets: multiple cultures. In Diversity and Its Discontents : Cultural Conflict and Common Ground in Contemporary American Society, ed. NJ Smelser, J Alexander, pp. 193-212. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press