Investigating teamwork and taskwork in single- and multi-display groupware systems

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 569-581

  Wallace, James R ^a   Scott, Stacey D ^a   Stutz, Taryn ^a   Enns, Tricia ^a   Inkpen, Kori ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication efficiency; Evaluation; Groupware; Multi display environment; Workspace awareness

Indexed keywords

CO-LOCATED GROUPWARE; COLLABORATIVE OPTIMIZATION; COMMUNICATION EFFICIENCY; DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS; DISPLAY ENVIRONMENTS; ERGONOMIC DESIGN; EVALUATION; GROUP BEHAVIOR; GROUPWARE SYSTEMS; INTERFACE DESIGNS; MULTI-DISPLAY ENVIRONMENT; SHARED RESOURCES; SOFTWARE INTERFACES; TASK INTERFACE; TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY; USER STUDY; WORKSPACE AWARENESS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 70349990013     PISSN: 16174909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-009-0241-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (59)

1. Baker K, Greenberg S, Gutwin C (2002) Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp 96-105
2. Biehl JT, Bailey BP (2004) ARIS: An interface for application relocation in an interactive space. In: Proceedings of the GI 2004, London, Ontario, Canada, pp 107-116
3. Biehl JT, Bailey BP (2006) Improving interfaces for managing applications in multiple-device environments. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces, Venezia, Italy, pp 35-42
4. Biehl JT et al (2007) FASTDash: A visual dashboard for fostering awareness in software teams. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA, pp 1313-1322
5. Birnholtz JP et al (2007) An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA, pp 91-100
6. Booth KS et al (2002) The "mighty mouse" multi-screen collaboration tool. In: Proceedings of the UIST 2002, Paris, France, pp 209-212
7. Clark HH, Brennan SE (1993) Grounding in communication: Readings in groupware and computer-supported cooperative work: Assisting human-human collaboration. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
8. Deitz P, Leigh D (2001) DiamondTouch: A multi-user touch technology. In: Proceedings of the UIST'00: ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, San Diego, CA, 5-8 November 2000, pp 219-226
9. Dix A et al (1998) Human computer interaction. Prentice-Hall, Toronto
10. Forlines C et al (2006) Exploring the effects of group size and display configuration on visual search. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work, Banff, AB, Canada, pp 11-20
11. Gergle D, Kraut RE, Fussell SR (2004) Action as language in a shared visual space. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Chicago, IL, USA, pp 487-496
12. Gergle D, Kraut RE, Fussell SR (2004) Language efficiency and visual technology: Minimizing collaborative effort with visual information. J Lang Soc Psychol 23(4):491-517
13. Greenberg S, Boyle M, Laberge J (1999) PDAs and shared public displays: making personal information public, and public information personal. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 3(1):54-64
14. Guimbretière F, Stone M, Winograd T (2001) Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays. In: Proceedings of the UIST'01: ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, Orlando, FL, 11-14 November 2001, pp 21-30
15. Gutwin C, Greenberg S (1998) Design for individuals, design for groups: tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 1998, Seattle, WA, USA, pp 207-216
16. Gutwin C, Greenberg S (1999) The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 6(3):243-281
17. Gutwin C, Greenberg S, Roseman, M (1996) Workspace awareness in real-time distributed groupware: Framework, widgets, and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the HCI'96: People and computers XI, 20-23 August 1996, London, UK, Springer, Berlin
18. Ha V et al (2006) Direct intentions: The effects of input devices on collaboration around a tabletop display. In: Proceedings of the TABLETOP, pp 177-184
19. Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension. Anchor Books, Garden City
20. Hancock JT, Dunham PJ (2001) Language use in computer-mediated communication: The role of coordination devices. Discourse Processes 31(1):91-110
21. Hart SG, Stateland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload, pp 139-183
22. Hawkey K et al (2005) The proximity factor: Impact of distance on co-located collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, pp 31-40
23. Huang EM, Mynatt ED (2003) Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
24. Inkpen KM et al (1999) This is fun! We're all best friends and we're all playing: Supporting children's synchronous collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning, Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp 252-259
25. Izadi S et al (2003) Dynamo: A public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media. In: Proceedings of the UIST, pp 159-168
26. Johanson B et al (2002) PointRight: Experience with flexible input redirection in interactive workspaces. In: Proceedings of the UIST 2002, Paris, France, pp 227-234
27. Liu C-C, Kao L-C (2005) Handheld devices with large shared-display groupware: Tools to facilitate group communication in one-to-one collaborative learning activities. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education (WMTE '05), p 8
28. Matsushita M et al (2004) Lumisight table: A face-to-face collaboration support system that optimizes direction of projected information to each stakeholder. In: Proceedings of the CSCW, pp 274-283
29. McGrath J (1984) Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
30. Myers BA (2000) The pebbles project: Using PCs and hand-held computers together. In: Proceedings of the CHI '00 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 14-15
31. Nacenta MA et al (2005) A comparison of techniques for multi-display reaching. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Portland, OR, USA, pp 371-380
32. Nacenta MA et al (2007) The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop groupware. In: Proceedings of the GI '07, pp 191-198
33. Nacenta MA et al (2007) E-conic: A perspective-aware interface for multi-display environments. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, Newport, RI, USA, pp 279-288
34. Noble D, Letsky M (2002) Cognitive-based metrics to evaluate collaboration effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the RTO SAS symposium on analysis of the military effectiveness of future C2 concepts and systems. The Hague, The Netherlands, 23-25 April, pp B6-1-B6-18
35. Parker JK, Mandryk RL, Inkpen KM (2006) Integrating point and touch for interaction with digital tabletop displays. In: Proceedings in computer graphics and applications, p 28
36. Perry MJ (1997) Distributed Cognition and computer supported collaborative design: The organisation of work in construction engineering. PhD thesis, Brunel University, UK
37. Pinelle D, Gutwin C (2008) Evaluating teamwork support in tabletop groupware applications using collaboration usability analysis. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 12(3):237-254
38. Pinelle D, Gutwin C (2000) A survey of groupware evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE workshop on enabling technologies - infrastructure for collaborative enterprises, pp 110-115
39. Pinelle D, Gutwin C, Greenberg S (2003) Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 10(4):281-311
40. Pinelle D et al (2008) The effects of co-present embodiments on awareness and collaboration in tabletop groupware. In: Proceedings of the graphics interface pp 1-8
41. Piper AM et al (2006) SIDES: A cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development. CSCW, pp 1-10
42. Ryall K et al (2004) Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Chicago, IL, USA, pp 284-293
43. Sharp H, Rogers Y, Preece J (2007) Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New York
44. Shen C, Everitt KM, Ryall K (2003) UbiTable: Impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces. In: Proceedings of UbiComp'03: 5th international conference on ubiquitous computing, Seattle, WA, USA, 12-15 October 2003, pp 281-288
45. Shen C et al (2006) Informing the design of direct-touch tabletops. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26(5):36-46
46. Shoemaker GBD, Inkpen KM (2001) Single display privacyware: Augmenting public displays with private information. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, WA, USA, pp 522-529
47. Sommer R (1969) Personal space: The behavior basis of design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
48. Stewart J, Bederson BB, Druin A (1999) Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: The CHI is the limit, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp 286-293
49. Sugimoto M, Hosoi K, Hashizume H (2004) Caretta: A system for supporting face-to-face collaboration by integrating personal and shared spaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria, pp 41-48
50. Tan DS, Gergle D, Czerwinski M (2005) A job-shop scheduling task for evaluating coordination during computer supported collaboration. Microsoft Research TR-2005-107
51. Tan DS et al (2008) Using job-shop scheduling tasks for evaluating collocated collaboration. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 12(3):255-267
52. Tang JC (1991) Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. Int J Man Mach Stud 34:143-160
53. Taylor RM (1990) Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Situational awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478). NATO-Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, pp 3/1-3/17
54. Tse E, Greenberg S (2004) Rapidly prototyping single display groupware through the SDGToolkit. In: Proceedings of AUIC'04: 5th Australasian user interface conference, Dunedin, New Zealand, 18-22 January 2004, pp 101-110
55. Wallace J et al (2006) Swordfish: User tailored workspaces in multi-display environments. In: Proceedings of the. CHI '06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Montréal, QC, Canada, pp 1487-1492
56. Wallace JR, Mandryk RL, Inkpen KM (2008) Comparing content and input redirection in MDEs. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 2008, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 157-166
57. Wallace JR, Scott SD (2008) Contextual design considerations for co-located, collaborative tables. In: Proceedings of the IEEE tabletop 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 57-64
58. Wallace JR, Scott SD (2008) Towards contextual design requirements for MDEs. In: Proceedings of the CSCWB2008 workshop: beyond the laboratory: supporting authentic collaboration with multiple displays, San Diego, CA, USA
59. Wigdor D et al (2007) Perception of elementary graphical elements in tabletop and multi-surface environments. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA, pp 473-482