Contact through canvas: An entertaining encounter

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 551-567

  van Boerdonk, Koen ^a   Tieben, Rob ^a   Klooster, Sietske ^a   van den Hoven, Elise ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bodily contact; Choreography of interaction; Collaborative music composing; Design research; Embodied interaction; Prototype evaluation; Social coherence; User experience

Indexed keywords

BODILY CONTACT; CHOREOGRAPHY OF INTERACTION; COLLABORATIVE MUSIC COMPOSING; DESIGN RESEARCH; EMBODIED INTERACTION; PROTOTYPE EVALUATION; SOCIAL COHERENCE; USER EXPERIENCE;

RESEARCH;

EID: 70349977172     PISSN: 16174909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-009-0240-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Allen S (2004) Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Sci Educ 88(S1):S17-S33
2. Antle A, Droumeva M, Corness G (2008) Playing with the sound maker: Do embodied metaphors help children learn? In: Proceedings of the seventh interaction design & children (IDC '08)
3. Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol 46:709-711
4. Association Creation (1999) http://www.c3.hu/events/99/bump/ content_description_en.html. Last visited March 16, 2009
5. Battarbee K (2003) Defining co-experience. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, Pittsburgh, June 23-26. DPPI '03. ACM, New York, p 109
6. Berscheid E, Snyder M, Omoto AM (1989) The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relations. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:792-807
7. Blaine T, Fels S (2003) Collaborative musical experiences for novices. J New Music Res 32(4):411-428
8. Blaine T, Perkis T (2000) The jam-o-drum interactive music system: A study in interaction design. In: DIS2000 conference proceedings, 2000, pp 165-173
9. Boerdonk K, Deckers E, Nagtzaam H, Schwachöfer J, Tieben R, Klooster S (2006) Meeting duet: Challenging people into a body language of meeting. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European workshop on design and semantics of form and movement, Eindhoven, pp 122-125
10. Bongers B (1998) An interview with sensorband. Comput Music J 22(1):13-24
11. Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1994) Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 25(1):49-59
12. Cooper A, Reimann R (2003) About face 2.0: The essentials of interaction design. Wiley, Indianapolis
13. Dourish P (2001) Where the action is. The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 126
14. Eckert C, Stacey M (2000) Sources of inspiration: A language of design. Des Stud 21(5):523-538
15. Fels S, Vogt F (2002) Tooka: Exploration of two person instruments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (NIME02), pp 116-121
16. Fitzmaurice GW, Ishii H, Buxton WA (1995) Bricks: Laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Denver, May 07-11, pp 442-449
17. Gaver WW (1991) Sound support for collaboration. In: European conference on computer-supported collaborative work. Amsterdam, pp 293-308
18. Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2003) AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Ziegler J, Szwillus G (eds) Mensch & computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung, Stuttgart, pp 187-196
19. Hornecker E (2008) I don't understand it either, but it is cool - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum. In: Proceedings of IEEE tabletop, pp 121-128
20. Hornecker E, Buur J (2006) Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montréal, April 22-27, pp 437-446
21. Hummels C, Overbeeke KC, Klooster S (2007) Move to get moved: A search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11(8):677-690
22. Jordà S, Geiger G, Alonso M, Kaltenbrunner M (2007) The reacTable: Exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on tangible and embedded interaction (TEI'07), Baton Rouge, February 15-17, pp 139-146
23. Klemmer SR, Hartmann B, Takayama L (2006) How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems, University Park, June 26-28. DIS '06. ACM, New York, pp 140-149
24. Klooster S, Overbeeke CJ (2005) Designing products as an integral part of choreography of interaction: The product's form as an integral part of movement. In: Proceedings of the 1st European workshop on design and semantics of form and movement, New Castle, pp 23-35
25. Krueger MW (1983) Artificial reality: Vol II. Addison-Wesley, Amsterdam, pp 34-48
26. Lowlands festival (n.d.) http://www.lowlands.nl. Last visited on March 16, 2009
27. Leenders MAAM, Telgen Jv, Gemser R, Wurff Rvd (2005) Success in the Dutch music festival market: The role of format and content. Int J Media Manag 7(3&4):148-157
28. Long A, Ramakrishnan A, Kok Lang L, Lai Chan M, Jong Kai K (2008) Impact of MI lessons on perceived students' needs satisfaction. In: Proceedings of APERA 2008, November 26-28, Singapore
29. Mahlke S (2005) Understanding users' experience of interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2005 annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics, Chania, Greece, September 29-October 01. ACM international conference proceeding series, vol 132. University of Athens, pp 251-254
30. Moen J (2006) KinAesthetic movement interaction. Designing for the pleasure of motion, Doctoral Thesis in HCI, KTH, Sweden
31. Motamedi N (2007) The aesthetics of touch in interaction design. In: Proceedings of designing pleasurable products and interfaces, 22-25 August 2007, Helsinki, pp 455-460
32. Motl R, Dishman R, Saunders R, Dowda M, Felton G, Pate R (2001) Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med 21(2):110-117
33. MSN Encarta (n.d.) http://encarta.msn.com/. Last visited March 16, 2009
34. Mueller F, Agamanolis S, Gibbs MR, Vetere F (2008) Remote impact: shadowboxing over a distance. In: CHI '08 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Florence, April 05-10, 2008, pp 2291-2296
35. Oxford American Dictionary of Current English (1999) http:// www.oxfordreference.com/. Last visited at March 16, 2009
36. Patten J, Recht B, Ishii H (2002) 'Audiopad: A tagbased interface for musical performance. In: Proceedings of the 2002 international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (NIME-02), Dublin, pp 11-16
37. Rogers Y, Sharp H, Preece J (2002) Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, Indianapolis
38. Ryan RM (1982) Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 43:450-461
39. Strauss W, Fleischmann M, Thomsen M, Novak J, Zlender U, Kulessa T, Pragasky F (1999) Staging the space of mixed reality - reconsidering the concept of a multi user environment. In: Proceedings of the fourth symposium on virtual reality modeling language, Paderborn, Germany, February 23-26, 1999. VRML '99. ACM, New York, pp 93-98
40. Tsigilis N, Theodosiou A (2003) Temporal stability of the intrinsic motivation inventory. Percept Mot Skills 97:271-280
41. Ullmer B, Ishii H (2000) Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Syst J 39(3-4):915-931
42. van den Hoven E, Frens J, Aliakseyeu D, Martens J, Overbeeke K, Peters P (2007) Design research & tangible interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on tangible and embedded interaction. Baton Rouge, February 15-17. TEI '07. ACM, New York, pp 109-115
43. Vegt E (2008) Sensing bodycontact. Unpublished project report, Industrial Design department, Eindhoven University of Technology
44. Weinberg G, Gan S (2001) The squeezables: Toward an expressive and interdependent multiplayer musical instrument. Comput Music J 25(2):37-45