Fetal MEG evoked response latency from beamformer with random field theory

NeuroImage

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 282-292

  McCubbin, J ^a   Vrba, J ^a,c   Murphy, P ^a   Temple, J ^a   Eswaran, H ^a   Lowery, C L ^a   Preissl, H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c Elekta Neuromag Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

Beamformer; Evoked response latency; Fetal magnetoencephalography; MEG; Random field theory; Statistical significance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FETOPLACENTAL UNIT; FETUS; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS FUNCTION TEST; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MENTAL DEVELOPMENT; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEWBORN; PARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PREGNANCY;

EID: 70349964688     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barnes G.R., and Hillebrand A. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images. Hum. Brain Map. 18 (2003) 1-12
2. Bonferroni C.E. Teoria statistica dele classi e calcolo delle probabilit. Pubblicazioni del R. Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze 8 (1936) 3-62
3. Brookes M.J., Vrba J., Robinson S.E., Stevenson C.M., Peters A.M., Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A., and Morris P.G. Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging. NeuroImage 39 (2008) 1788-1802
4. Carbonell F., Galán L., Valdés P., Worsley K.J., Biscay R.J., Díaz-Comas L., Bobes M.A., and Parra M. Random field-union intersection tests for linear electrophysiological imaging. NeuroImage 22 (2004) 268-276
5. Carbonell F., Worsley K.J., Trujillo-Barreto N., and Sotero R.C. Random field-union intersection tests for detecting functional connectivity in EEG/MEG imaging. Human Brain Mapping 30 (2009) 2477-2486
6. Dragonova R., Eswaran H., Murphy P., Lowery C., and Preissl H. Serial magnetoencephalographic study of fetal and newborn auditory discriminative evoked responses. Early Hum. Dev. 83 (2007) 199-207
7. Frey B.J., and Dueck D. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315 (2007) 972-976
8. Friston K.J., Holmes A., Poline J.-B., Price C.J., and Frith C.D. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. NeuroImage 40 (1996) 223-235
9. Eswaran H., Wilson J.D., Preissl H., Robinson S.E., Vrba J., Murphy P., Rose D.F., and Lowery C.L. Magnetoencephalographic recordings of visual evoked brain activity in the human fetus. Lancet 360 (2002) 779-780
10. Govindan R.B., Wilson J.D., Preissl H., Murphy P., Lowery C.L., and Eswaran H. An objective assessment of fetal and neonatal auditory evoked responses. NeuroImage 43 (2008) 512-527
11. Gowland P., and Fulford J. Initial experiences of performing fetal fMRI. Exp. Neurol. 190 Suppl. 1 (2004) S22-S27
12. Kiefer I., Siegel E., Preissl H., Ware M., Schauf B., Lowery C., and Eswaran H. Delayed maturation of auditory-evoked response in growth-restricted fetuses revealed by magnetoencephalographic recordings. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199 (2008) 503 e1-503.e7
13. Kræmer M., Abrahamsson M., and Sjöström A. The neonatal development of the light flash visual evoked potential. Doc. Ophthalmol. 99 (1999) 21-39
14. Lengle J.M., Chen M., and Wakai R.T. Improved neuromagnetic detection of fetal and neonatal auditory evoked responses. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 (2001) 785-792
15. Li S.S., Bigler J., Lampe J.W., Potter J.D., and Feng Z. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays. Stat. Med. 24 (2005) 2267-2280
16. Lowery C.L., Eswaran H., Murphy P., and Preissl H. Fetal magnetoencephalography. Sem. Fetal Neonatal Med. 11 (2006) 430-436
17. Marchini J., and Presanis A. Comparing methods of analyzing fMRI statistical parametric maps. NeuroImage 22 (2004) 1203-1213
18. McCubbin J., Robinson S.E., Cropp R., Moiseev A., Vrba J., Murphy P., Priessl H., and Eswaran H. Optimal reduction of MCG in fetal MEG recordings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 (2006) 1720-1724
19. McCubbin J., Murphy P., Eswaran H., Preissl H., Yee T., Robinson S.E., and Vrba J. Validation of the flash-evoked response from fetal MEG. Phys. Med. Biol. 52 (2007) 5803-5813
20. Montgomery D.C., and Runger G.C. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. 3rd ed (2003), Wiley and sons, New York
21. Robinson S.E., and Vrba J. Cleaning fetal MEG using a beamformer search for the optimal forward model. In: Halgren E., Ahlfors S., Hamalainen M., and Cohen D. (Eds). Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Biomagnetism (2004) 339-340
22. Robinson S.E., Vrba J., and McCubbin J. In: Nowak H., et al. (Ed). Separating fetal MEG signals from the noise (2002), Biomag 2002, VDE Verlag Gmbh, Berlin 665-667
23. Schleussner E., and Schneider U. Developmental changes of auditory-evoked fields in fetuses. Exp. Neurol. 190 Suppl. 1 (2004) S59-S64
24. Sekihara K., Nagarajan S., Poeppel D., and Marantz A. Asymptotic SNR of scalar and vector minimum-variance beamformers for neuromagnetic source reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51 (2004) 1726-1734
25. Sheridan C.J., Preissl H., Siegel E., Murphy P., Ware M., Lowery C.L., and Eswaran H. Neonatal and fetal response decrement of evoked responses: a MEG study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 119 (2008) 796-804
26. Taylor J.E., and Worsley K.J. Detecting sparse signal in random fields, with an application to brain mapping. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 102 (2007) 913-928
27. Tsuneishi S., Casaer P., Fock J.M., and Hirano S. Establishment of normal values for flash evoked potentials (VEPs) in preterm infants: a longitudinal study with special reference to two components of the N1 wave. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 (1995) 291-299
28. Van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., and Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 9 (1997) 867-880
29. Vrba J., Robinson S.E., McCubbin J., Lowery L., Eswaran H., Murphy P., and Preissl H. Searching for the best model: ambiguity of inverse solutions and application to fetal magnetoencephalography. Phys. Med. Biol. 52 (2007) 757-776
30. Worsley K.J., Marrett S., Neelin P., Vandal A.C., Friston K.J., and Evans A.C. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum. Brain Map. 4 (1996) 58-73
31. Worsley K.J., Andermann M., Koulis T., MacDonald D., and Evans A.C. Detecting changes in nonisotropic images. Hum. Brain Map. 8 (1999) 98-101
32. Wilson J.D., Adams A.J., Murphy P., Eswaran H., and Preissl H. Design of a light stimulator for fetal and neonatal magnetoencephalography. Physiol. Meas. 30 1 (2008) N1-N10