Random Field-Union Intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging

NeuroImage

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 268-276

  Carbonell, F ^a,e   Galan L ^b   Valdes P ^b   Worsley, K ^c   Biscay, R J ^d   Diaz Comas L ^b   Bobes, M A ^b   Parra, M ^b  

^a Inst of Cybernet Math and Phys   (Cuba)

^b CUBAN NEUROSCIENCE CENTER   (Cuba)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAVANA   (Cuba)

^e INSTITUTO DE CIBERNÉTICA   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Average reference; EEG MEG Source Analysis; Event related potentials; Global Field Power; Hotelling's T2; Random fields; Union Intersection test

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; IMAGING; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOM FIELD THEORY; RECORDING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STIMULATION; TOMOGRAPHY; TOPOGRAPHY; UNION INTERSECTION TEST; VISION;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; OCCIPITAL LOBE; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 1942424984     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adler R.J. The Geometry of Random Fields. 1981;Wiley, New York.
2. Aunon J.I., McGillen C.D., Childers D.C. Signal processing in evoked potentials research: averaging and modeling. CRC Critical Reviews in Bioengineering. 5:1981;323-367.
3. Blair R.C., Karniski W. An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potential. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;518-524.
4. Bosch J., Valdés P., Virues T., Aubert E., John R., Harmony T., Riera J., Trujillo N. 3D statistical parametric mapping of EEG source spectra by means of variable resolution electromagnetic tomography (VARETA). Clinical Electroencephalography. 32:2001;47-61.
5. Cao J., Worsley K.J. The detection of local shape changes via the geometry of Hotelling's T2 fields. Annals of Statistics. 27:1999;925-942.
6. Dale A.M., Liu A.K., Fischl B.R., Buckner R.L., Belliveau J.W., Lewine J.D., Halgren E. Dynamical statistical parametric mapping combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron. 26:2000;55-67.
7. Dobie R.A. Objective response detection. Ear and Hearing. 14:1993;31-35.
8. Dumermuth G., Molinari L. Spectral analysis of the EEG. Some fundamentals revisited and some open problems. Neuropsychobiology. 17:1987;85-99.
9. Friston K.J., Frith C.D., Liddle P.F., Frackowiak R.S. Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 11:1991;690-699.
10. Friston K.J., Stephan K.M., Heather J.D., Frith C.D., Ionnides A.A., Liu L.C., Rugg M.D., Vieth J., Keber H., Hunter K., Frackowiak R.S.J. A multivariate analysis of evoked responses in EEG and MEG data. NeuroImage. 3:1996;167-174.
11. Galán L., Biscay R., Rodriguez J.L., Perez-Avalo M.C., Rodriguez R. Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 102:1997;240-247.
12. Hochberg Y., Tamhane A.C. Multiple Comparisons Procedures. 1987;Wiley, New York.
13. Jenning J.R., Cohen M.J., Ruchkin D.S., Fridlund A.J. Editorial policy on analysis of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology. 24(4):1987;474-478.
14. Jimenez J.C., Biscay R., Montoto O. Modeling the electroencephalogram by means of spatial spline smoothing and temporal autoregression. Biological Cybernetics. 72:1995;249-259.
15. Lehmann D. Principles of spatial analysis. Gevins A., Gémond A. Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Rev. Ser. Analysis of Electrical and Magnetic Signals. vol. 1:1987;309-354 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
16. Mardia K.V., Kent J.T., Bibby J.M. Multivariate Analysis. 1979;Academic Press, London.
17. Park H.J., Kwon J.S., Youn T., Pae J.S., Kim J.J., Kim M.S., Ha K.S. Statistical parametric mapping of LORETA using high density EEG and individual MRI: application to mismatch negativities in schizophrenia. Human Brain Mapping. 17:2002;178-186.
18. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity of the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 18:1994;49-65.
19. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Esslen M., Kochi K., Lehmann D. Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology. 24C:2002;91-95.
20. Peterson K.M., Nichols T.E., Poline J.B., Holmes A.P. Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging. II. Signal detection and statistical inference. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 354:1999;1261-1281.
21. Raz J. Analysis of repeated measurements using nonparametric smoothers and randomization tests. Biometrics. 45:1989;851-871.
22. Uhlig H. On singular Wishart and singular multivariate Beta distribution. Annals of Statistics. 22(1):1994;395-405.
23. Vasey M.W., Thayer J.F. The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. Psychophysiology. 24(4):1987;479-486.
24. Worsley K.J., Evans A.C., Marrett S., Neelin P. A three dimensional statistical analysis of CBF activation studies in human brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 12:1992;900-918.
25. Worsley K.J., Andermann M., Koulis T., MacDonald D., Evans A.C. Detecting changes in non-isotropic images. Human Brain Mapping. 8:1999;98-101.