The INDUS knee prosthesis - Prospective multicentric trial of a posteriorly stabilized high-flex design: 2 years follow-up

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 367-374

  Sancheti, Kantilal H ^a   Laud, Nandu S ^b   Bhende, Harish ^b   Reddy, Gurava ^c   Pramod, Neema ^d   Mani, Joseph N ^e  

^a Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation   (India)

^b Laud Clinic   (India)

^c Sumshine ^*

^d 714/715 Vijay Syndicate   (India)

^e BABY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Backside wear; High flexion; INDUS knee

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349907961     PISSN: 00195413     EISSN: 19983727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.55976     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:9-12.
2. Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS. The total condylar knee prosthesis: A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:173-180
3. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:754-765
4. Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P. Total condylar knee replacement: Preliminary report 1976. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;388:3-6. (Pubitemid 32594999)
5. Ranawat CS. The patellofemoral joint in total condylar knee arthroplasty: Pros and cons based on five- to ten-year follow-up observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:93-99
6. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty: Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;226:6-13.
7. Ranawat CS, Rose HA. Clinical and radiographic results of total-condylar knee arthroplasty: A 3- to 8-year follow-up. In Total- Condylar Knee Arthroplasty: Techniques, Results, and Complications. In: Ranawat CS, editor. New York: Springer; 1985. p. 140-148
8. Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R. Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: How much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 2000;12:143-155
9. Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: Range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:191-198
10. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: A modification of the total condylar design: Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1317-1323
11. Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ. The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;278:147-152
12. Ranawat CS, Luessenhop CP, Rodriguez JA. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system: Four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate- substituting design. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:342-348
13. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi GJ. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:1163-1173
14. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis: Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:980-986
15. Martin SD, McManus JL, Scott RD, Thornhill TS. Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty: 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:603-614
16. Ritter MA, Campbell E, Faris PM, Keating EM. Long-term survival analysis of the posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty: A 10-year evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1989;4:293-296
17. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, Walker SA, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA. A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;428:174-179
18. Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, Schule S, Zayontz S, Park SE, et al. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: An in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1721-1729
19. Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:174-176
20. Conditt MA, Thompson MT, Usrey MM, Ismaily SK, Noble PC. Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: Mechanism and magnitude of material loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:326-331
21. Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, Laud NS. Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:79-85.
22. Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005;13:193-196
23. Mikulak SA, Mahoney OM, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posteriorcruciate- substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:398-403.
24. Vince KG. Principles of condylar knee arthroplasty: Issues evolving. Instr Course Lect 1993;42:315-324
25. Beight JL, Yao B, Hozack WJ, Hearn SL, Booth RE Jr. The patellar "clunk" syndrome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;299:139-142
26. Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr, Balderston RA. The patellar clunk syndrome: A complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;241:203-208
27. Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Ginn SD, Engh GA. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: Influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert: Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2702-2708
28. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13-14
29. Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, Rasquinha VJ, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: Short-term results. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:35-39
30. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr. Deshmukh RG. Impact of modern technique on long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;309:131-135
31. Gandhi R, Tso P, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. High-flexion implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Knee 2009;16:14-17
32. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kwon OR, Kim JS. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses: A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:753-760
33. Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V, Zikria BA, Zikria JF, Ranawat CS. The PFC Sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: A matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006;29:S49-S52.
34. Bin SI, Nam TS. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: Comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:350-355
35. Goldberg VM, Figgie III HE, Figgie MP. Technical consideration in total knee surgery: Management of patellar problems. Orthop Clin North Am 1989;20:189.
36. Ranawat CS. The patellofemoral joint in total condylar knee arthroplasty: Pros and cons based on five- to ten-year follow-up observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:93-99
37. Krackow KA. The technique of total knee arthroplasty. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1990.
38. Hoaglund FT, Low WD. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;152:10-16
39. Saikia KC, Bhuyan SK, Rongphar R. Anthropometric study of the hip joint in Northeastern region population with computed tomography scan. Indian J Orthop 2008;42:260-266
40. Han HS, Kang SB, Yoon KS. High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1457-1461
41. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr, Elting J, Stiehl J. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;331:87-92.
42. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:50-53
43. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, et al. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;356:47-57.
44. Ritter MA. High-flexion knee designs: More hype than hope? In the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:40-1