Model-driven performability analysis of composite web services

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5119 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 228-246

  Bocciarelli, Paolo ^a   D'Ambrogio, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Composite web services; Model driven development; Perform ability; Performance; Reliability

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; FORECASTING; INFORMATION SERVICES; QUALITY OF SERVICE; RELIABILITY; SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA); WEBSITES;

BUSINESS PROCESS EXECUTION LANGUAGE FOR WEB SERVICES; COMPOSITE WEB SERVICES; DISTRIBUTED APPLICATIONS; EMERGING COMPUTING PARADIGM; MODEL DRIVEN APPROACH; MODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; PERFORM-ABILITY; PERFORMANCE;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 70349880842     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69814-2_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web Services. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
2. WWW Consortium, Web Services Description language (WSDL) Version 2.0, W3C Working Draft (January 2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20
3. Ludwig, H.: Web Services QoS: External SLAs and Internal Policies - Or: How do we deliver what we promise? In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE 2003 Workshops, Italy (2003)
4. Menascé, D.A.: QoS Issues in Web Services. IEEE Internet Computing, 72-75 (November/December 2002)
5. Peltz, C.: Web Services Orchestration and Choreography. IEEE Computer 36, 46-52 (2003)
6. Wohed, P., Van Der Aalst, M.P.W., Dumas, M., Ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Analysis of Web Services Composition Languages, The Case of BPEL4WS. In: Song, I.-Y., Liddle, S.W., Ling, T.-W., Scheuermann, P. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol.2813, pp. 200-215. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
7. IBM, BPEL - Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, version 1.1 (2003)
8. D'Ambrogio, A., Bocciarelli, P.: A Model-driven Approach to Describe and Predict the Performance of Composite Services. In: Proceedings of the 6th Int. Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), Buenos Aires, Argentina (2007)
9. D'Ambrogio, A.: A WSDL Extension for Performance-enabled Description of Web Services. In: Yolum, p., Güngör, T., Gürgen, F., Özturan, C. (eds.) ISCIS 2005. LNCS, vol.3733. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
10. Object Management Group, UML Profile for Scheduling, Performance and Time, version 1.1 (January 2005)
11. Meyer, J.F.: On evaluating performability of degradable computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-29(8), 720-731 (1980)
12. Smith, R.M., Trivedi Kishor, S., Ramesh, A.V.: Performability Analysis: Measures, an Algorithm, and a Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Computers 37(4), 406-417 (1988)
13. D'Ambrogio, A.: A Model-driven WSDL Extension for Describing the QoS of Web Services. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), Chicago, USA (2006)
14. Object Management Group, UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms, Adopted Specification
15. Menascé, M.A.: QoS Issues in Web Services. IEEE Internet Computing, 72-75 (November/December 2002)
16. Object Management Group, Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4 (2002)
17. Cortellessa, V., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P.: Software Performance Model-Driven Architecture. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Dijon, France (2006)
18. Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language (UML): Superstructure, version 2.0
19. Rosario, S., Benveniste, A., Haar, S., Jard, C.: Probabilistic QoS and soft contracts for transaction based Web services orchestrations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (2007)
20. Xu, J., Oufimtsev, A., Woodside, M., Murphy, L.: Performance modeling and prediction of enterprise JavaBeans with layered queuing network templates. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering 31(2) (2006)
21. Gu, G.P., Petriu, D.B.: From UML to LQN by XML algebra-based model transformations. In: Proceedings of the ACM Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP 2005), Palma de Mallorca, Spain (2005)
22. D'Ambrogio, A.: A Model Transformation Framework for the Automated Building of Performance Models from UML Models. In: Proceedings of the ACM Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP 2005), Palma de Mallorca, Spain (2005)
23. Gardner, T.: UML Modelling of Automated Business Processes with a Mapping to BPEL. In: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Object Orientation and Web Services (in conjunction with ECOOP 2003), Darmstadt, Germany (2003), http://www.ibm.com/ developerworks/webservices/library/ws-uml2bpel/
24. Lyu, M.R.: Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)
25. Whittaker, J.A., Thomason, M.G.: A Markov Chain Model for Statistical Software Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(10), 812-824 (1994)
26. Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P., Miller, J.A., Arnold, J., Kochut, K.: Quality of service for workflows and web service processes. Journal of Web Semantics 1(3), 281-308 (2004)
27. Das, O., Woodside, C.M.: Dependable-LQNS: A Performability Modeling Tool for Layered Systems. In: Kemper, P., Sanders, W.H. (eds.) TOOLS 2003. LNCS, vol.2794. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
28. Deavours, D.D., Clark, G., Courtney, T., Daly, D., Derisavi, S., Doyle, J.M., Sanders, W.H., Webster, P.G.: The Möbius Framework and Its Implementation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(10), 956-969 (2002)