Analysis of web services composition languages: The case of BPEL4WS

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2813, Issue , 2003, Pages 200-215

  Wohed, Petia ^a   Van Der Aalst, Wil M P ^b,c   Dumas, Marlon ^c   Ter Hofstede, Arthur H M ^c  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; WEBSITES;

APPLICATION INTEGRATION; BPEL4WS; BUSINESS PROCESS EXECUTION LANGUAGE FOR WEB SERVICES; COMMUNICATION PATTERN; IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES; WEB SERVICES COMPOSITION;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 0142157001     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39648-2_18     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. W.M.P. van der Aalst. Don't go with the flow: Web services composition standards exposed. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18(1):72-76, January/February 2003.
2. W.M.P. van der Aalst, M. Dumas, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and P. Wohed. Pattern-Based Analysis of BPML (and WSCI). Technical Report FIT-TR-2002-05, Faculty of IT, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2002. www.citi.qut.edu.au/pubs/technical/pattern_based_analysis_BPML.pdf.
3. W.M.P. van der Aalst and K.M. van Hee. Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002.
4. W.M.P. van der Aalst and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Technical Report FIT-TR-2002-06, Faculty of IT, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2002. tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/download/yawl_qut_report_FIT-TR-2002-06.pdf.
5. W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A.P. Barros. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5-51, July 2003.
6. BPML.org. Business Process Modeling Language. Accessed November 2002 from www.bpmi.org/, 2002.
7. F. Curbera, M. Duftler, R. Khalaf, W. Nagy, N. Mukhi, and S. Weerawarana. Unraveling the Web Services Web: An Introduction to SOAP, WSDL, and UDDI. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(2):86-93, March 2002.
8. F. Curbera, Y. Goland, J. Klein, F. Leymann, D. Roller, S. Thatte, and S. Weerawarana. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services version 1.1. http://dev2dev.bea.com/techtrack/BPEL4WS.jsp.
9. S. Dalal, S. Temel, M. Little, M. Potts, and J. Webber. Coordinating Business Transactions on the Web. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1):30-39, January/February 2003.
10. M. Dumas and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language. In M. Gogolla and C. Kobryn, editors, Proc. of the 4th Int. Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML01), volume 2185 of LNCS, pages 76-90, Toronto, Canada, October 2001. Springer Verlag.
11. P. Green and M. Rosemann. An Ontological Analysis of Integrated Process Modelling. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), pages 225-240, Heidelberg, Germany, June 1999. Springer Verlag.
12. Hillside.net. Patterns Home Page. http://hillside.net/patterns, 2000-2002.
13. B. Kiepuszewski. Expressiveness and Suitability of Languages for Control Flow Modelling in Workflows. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2003. Available via http://www.tm.tue.nl/it/research/patterns.
14. B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and C. Bussler. On Structured Workflow Modelling. In B. Wangler and L. Bergman, editors, Proc. of the 12th Int. Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE00), volume 1789 of LNCS, pages 431-445, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2000. Springer Verlag.
15. F. Leymann and D. Roller. Production Workflow: Concepts and Techniques. Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999.
16. W.A. Ruh, F.X. Maginnis, and W.J. Brown. Enterprise Application Integration: A Wiley Tech Brief. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 2001.
17. R. Shapiro. A Comparison of XPDL, BPML and BPEL4WS. Accessed February 2003, http://xml.coverpages.org/Shapiro-XPDL.pdf.
18. E. Söderström, B. Andersson, P. Johannesson, E. Perjons, and B. Wangler. Towards a framework for comparing process modelling languages. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), volume 2348 of LNCS, Toronto, Canada, May 2002. Springer.
19. UN/CEFACT and OASIS. ebXML Business Process Specification Schema (Version 1.01). Accessed November 2002 from www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf, 2001.
20. W3C. Web Service Choreography Interface (WSCI) 1.0. Accessed November 2002 from www.w3.org/TR/wsci/, 2002.
21. WfMC. Terminology and Glossary. Document WFMC-TC-1011 Issue 3.0, February 1999 http://www.wfmc.org.
22. WfMC. Workflow Standard - Interoperability Wf-XML Binding. Document Number WFMC-TC-1023, Final Draft, accessed March 2003 from http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/Wf-XML-11.pdf, November 2001.
23. WfMC. Workflow Process Definition Interface - XML Process Definition Language. Accessed November 2002 from www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1025_10_beta_xpdl_073002.pdf, 2002.