Accuracy of sonographic findings in breast cancer: Correlation between BI-RADS® categories and histological findings;Acurácia dos achados ultrassonográficos do câncer de mama: Correlação da classificação BI-RADS® e achados histológicos

Radiologia Brasileira

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 235-240

  do Nascimento, José Hermes Ribas ^a   da Silva, Vinicius Duval ^b   Maciel, Antonio Carlos ^c  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b Unit of Radiology   (Algeria)

^c HOSPITAL DE CLÍNICAS DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Anatomopathological; BI RADS; Breast cancer; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349876427     PISSN: 01003984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-39842009000400009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chala LF, Barros N. Avaliação das mamas com métodos de imagem [editorial]. Radiol Bras. 2007;40(1):iv-vi.
2. Guiseppetti GM, Giuliani F, Baldassarre S, et al. Metodologia e semiologia. In: Veronesi U, editor. Mastologia oncológica. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 2002. p. 95-106.
3. Baker JA, Soo MS. Breast US: assessment of technical quality and image interpretation. Radiology. 2002;223:229-38.
4. Parker SH, Stavros AT, Dennis MA. Needle biopsy techniques. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33: 1171-86.
5. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123-34.
6. Bassett LW, Kim CH. Breast imaging: mammography and ultrasonography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001;9:251-71.
7. Schroeder RJ, Bostanjoglo M, Rademaker J, et al. Role of power Doppler techniques and ultrasound contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of focal breast lesions. Eur Radiol. 2003;13: 68-79.
8. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1675-9.
9. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191-9.
10. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002; 225:165-75.
11. Saarenmaa I, Salminen T, Geiger U, et al. The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultrasonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;67:117-23.
12. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: ultrasound, 1st ed. In: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: BI-RADS atlas, 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
13. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia. BI-RADS -Sistema de laudos e registro de dados de imagem da mama. São Paulo: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia; 2005.
14. Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1490-9.
15. Costantini M, Belli P, Lombardi R, et al. Characterization of solid breast masses: use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:649-59.
16. Melhado VC, Alvares BR, Almeida OJ. Correlação radiológica e histológica de lesões mamárias não-palpáveis em pacientes submetidas a marcação pré-cirúrgica, utilizando-se o sistema BI-RADS. Radiol Bras. 2007;40:9-11.
17. Liberman L, Abramson A, Squires FB, et al. The breast imaging report and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:35-40.
18. ®: valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5. Revisão sistemática da literatura. Radiol Bras. 2007;40:173-7.
19. Fleury EFC, Rinaldi JF, Piato S, et al. Apresentação das lesões mamárias císticas à ultra-sonografia utilizando a elastografia. Radiol Bras. 2008; 41:167-72.
20. Roveda Jr D, Piato S, Oliveira VM, et al. Valores preditivos das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do sistema BI-RADS em lesões mamárias nodulares não-palpáveis avaliadas por mamografia, ultra-sonografia e ressonância magnética. Radiol Bras. 2007;40: 93-8.
21. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, et al. Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS assessment categories (the Florence experience). Breast. 2006;15:44-51.
22. Chen SC, Cheung YC, Su CH, et al. Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:188-93.
23. Calas MJG, Koch HA, Dutra MVP. Ultra-sonografia mamária: avaliação dos critérios ecográficos na diferenciação das lesões mamárias. Radiol Bras. 2007;40:1-7.