Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: Positive predictive value of categories 3, 4 and 5. A systematic literature review;Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: Valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5. Revisão sistemática da literatura

Radiologia Brasileira

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 173-177

  Kestelman, Fabíola Procaci ^a,d   De Souza, Gustavo Antônio ^b   Thuler, Luiz Claudio ^a,c   Martins, Gabriela ^a   De Freitas, Vivianne Aguilera Rolim ^a   Canella, Ellyete De Oliveira ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^d Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

BI RADS ; Breast cancer; Mammography

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148817580     PISSN: 01003984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-39842007000300008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. INCA. Instituto Nacional do Câncer, Ministério da Saúde. Estimativa da incidência e da mortalidade por câncer no Brasil. Acessado em: 22/9/2004. Disponível em: http://www.inca.gov.br/ estimativas/2003/index.asp?link=conteudo_view.asp&ID=4
2. Newman LA, Sabel M. Advances in breast cancer detection and management. Med Clin North Am 2003;87:997-1028.
3. Thuler LC. Considerações sobre a prevenção do câncer de mama feminino. Rev Bras Cancerol 2003;49:227-238.
4. Ciatto S, Cataliotti L, Distante V. Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases. Radiology 1987;165:99-102.
5. Cyrlak D. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography. Radiology 1988;168:661-663.
6. Hall FM, Storella JM, Siverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendation for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988;167:353-358.
7. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Dershaw DD, Schreer I. Diagnostic breast imaging: mammography, sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and interventional procedures. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2001;393.
8. Knutzen AM, Gisvold JJ. Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:454-460.
9. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1993.
10. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995.
11. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998.
12. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
13. Chala LF, Barros N. ACR BI-RADS™ na ultrasonografia. Radiol Bras 2004;37(2):III-IV.
14. Camargo Júnior HSA. BI-RADS®-ultra-som: vantagens e desvantagens dessa nova ferramenta de trabalho. Radiol Bras 2005;38:301-303.
15. Zonderland HM, Pope TL Jr, Nieborg AJ. The positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1743-1750.
16. Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BIRADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999;211:845-850.
17. Ball CG, Butchart M, MacFarlane JK. Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. Can J Surg 2002;45:259-263.
18. Tan YY, Wee SB, Tan MP, Chong BK. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS categorization in an Asian population. Asian J Surg 2004;27:186-191.
19. Bérubé M, Curpen B, Ugolini P, Lalonde L, Ouimet-Oliva D. Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BIRADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998;49:223-228.
20. Tate PS, Rogers EL, McGee EM, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy: a six-year surgical experience. J Ky Med Assoc 2001;99:98-103.
21. Margolin FR, Leung JW, Jacobs RP, Denny SR. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years' experience in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:559-564.
22. Travade A, Isnard A, Bagard C, et al. Macrobiopsies stéré otaxiques par système à aspiration 11-G: à propos de 249 patientes. J Radiol 2002;83(9 Pt 1):1063-1071.
23. Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, Malekshamran K, Perez I, Ramos E. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Ann Oncol 2004;15:450-454.
24. Lacquement MA, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth AB. Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:34-40.
25. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:35-40.
26. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.
27. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 1999;212:189-194.
28. Liberman L. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:483-500.
29. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:409-430.
30. Godinho ER, Koch HA. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS™): como tem sido utilizado? Radiol Bras 2004;37:413-417.
31. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1769-1777.
32. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2003;290:2129-2137.