The usability analysis with heuristic evaluation and analytic hierarchy process

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 934-939

  Kiliç Delice, Elif ^a   Güngör, Zülal ^b  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Heuristic evaluation; Usability; Web site

Indexed keywords

HEURISTIC EVALUATION; NEW APPROACHES; USABILITY; USABILITY ANALYSIS; USABILITY EVALUATION TECHNIQUE; USABILITY PROBLEMS; WEB DEVELOPMENT; WEB SITE DESIGN; WEB USABILITY;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; HEURISTIC METHODS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER NETWORK; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ERGONOMICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; OFFICE WORKER; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

EID: 70349866327     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aitta M.R., Kaleva S., and Kortelainen T. Heuristic evaluation applied to library web services. New Library World 109 1/2 (2008) 25-45
2. Işi{dotless}klar G., and Büyüközkan G. Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standards & Interfaces 29 (2007) 265-274
3. Chen, M.-S., Lin, M.-C., Wang, C.-C., Chang, C.A., 2009. Using HCA and TOPSIS approaches in personal digital assistant menu-icon interface design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (5), 689-702.
4. Daǧdeviren M., Yavuz S., and Ki{dotless}li{dotless}nç N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications 36 4 (2009) 8143-8151
5. Dickstein R., and Mills V. Usability testing at the University of Arizona Library: how to let the users in on the design. Information Technology and Libraries 19 3 (2000) 144-151
6. Dix A. Human-computer Interaction (2004), Pearson/Prentice-Hall, Harlow, England
7. Ebenezer C. Usability evaluation of an NHS library website. Health Information & Libraries Journal 20 3 (2003) 134
8. Expert Choice, Mclean, VA: Decision Support Software, 1986.
9. Folmer E., and Bosch J. Architecting for usability: a survey. The Journal of Systems and Software 70 (2004) 61-78
10. Ho W. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 186 (2008) 211-228
11. Hsiao S.W. Concurrent design method for developing a new product. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 29 (2002) 41-55
12. http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_evaluation.html February 2009
13. http://www.lib.gazi.edu.tr_2009
14. Hvannberg E.T., Law E.L., and Larusdottir M.K. Heuristic evaluation: comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems. Interacting with Computers 19 (2007) 225-240
15. ISO 9241-11, 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on usability.
16. Ji Y.G., Jin B.S., Mun J.S., and Ko S.M. Development of AHP Model for Telematics Haptic Interface Evaluation. Human-Computer Interaction (2007) 517-526
17. Kanis H. Usage centered research for everyday product design. Applied Ergonomics 29 (1998) 75-82
18. Ki{dotless}li{dotless}ç, E. The usability analysis of a University Library Web Site using method of usability test, heuristic evaluation and analytic hierarchy process, M.Sc. thesis, Gazi University.
19. Liljegren E. Usability in a medical technology context assessment of methods for usability evaluation of medical equipment. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36 (2006) 345-352
20. Ling, C., 2005. Advances in heuristic usability evaluation method, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
21. Long H., Lage K., Cronin C., and Long H. The flight plan of a digital initiatives project, part 2: usability testing in the context of user-centered design. OCLC Systems & Services 21 4 (2005) 324-345
22. Mitta D.A. An application of the analytical hierarchy process: a rank-ordering of computer interfaces. Human Factors 35 1 (1993) 141-157
23. Molich R., and Nielsen J. Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM33 3 (1990) 338-348
24. Nielsen, J., Molich, R., 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf., pp. 249-256.
25. Nielsen J. Traditional dialogue design applied to modem user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 33 10 (1990) 109-118
26. Nielsen, J., 1992. Finding Usability Problems Through Heuristic Evaluation. Proceedings ACM CHI'92 Conference, Monterey, pp. 373-380.
27. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering (1993), Academic Press, Boston
28. Nielsen, J., 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics, Proceedings ACM CHI'94 Conference, Boston, 152-158.
29. Nielsen J. Usability Inspection Methods (1994), John Wiley & Sons, New York
30. Norman D.A. The Design of Everyday Things (1998), MIT Press
31. Park K.S., and Lim C.H. A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface design designs using usability criteria and measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 23 (1999) 379-389
32. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill International Book Company, USA
33. Saaty T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process (1996), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
34. Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface. third ed. (1998), Addison-Wesley
35. Tan W.-s., Liu D., and Bishu R. Web evaluation: heuristic evaluation vs. user testing. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (2009) 621-627
36. Trinidad-Christensen J., and Manzari L. User-centered design of a web site for library and information science students: heuristic evaluation and usability testing. Information Technology & Libraries 25 3 (2006) 163-169
37. Validya O.S., and Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169 (2006) 1-29
38. Wang Y.M., Liu L., and Elhag T.M.S. An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 54 (2008) 513-525
39. Yüksel I., and Daǧdeviren M. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - a case study for a textile firm. Information Science 177 16 (2007) 3364-3382