Engaged scholarship: Reflections and research on the pedagogy of social change

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 541-552

  Peterson, Tessa Hicks ^a  

^a PITZER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Civic engagement; Community based; Communitycampus partnerships; Engaged scholarship; Experiential learning; Participatory research; Service learning; Social change

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349858241     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510903186741     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Austin, A.W. and L. Sax. 1998. How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development 39, no. 3: 251-63.
2. Bacon, N. 2002. Differences in faculty and community partners' theories of learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 9, no. 1: 34-44.
3. Boyte, H.D., and H. Farr. 1997. The work of citizenship and the problem of service-learning. In Practicing democracy: Concepts and models of service-learning in political science, ed. R. Battistoni and W. Hudson, 35-48. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
4. Bushouse, B.K. 2005. Community nonprofit organizations and service-learning: Resource constraints to building partnerships with universities. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 12, no. 1: 32-40.
5. Calderon, J. 2007. Race, poverty, and social justice: Multidisciplinary perspectives through service learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
6. Cruz, N., and D.E. Giles. 2000. Where's the community in service-learning? Special issue. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 7: 28-34.
7. Dorado, S., and D.E. Giles. 2004. Service-learning partnerships: Paths of engagement. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 9, no. 1: 25-37.
8. Eyler, J., and D. Giles. 1999. Where's the learning in service-learning?. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Eyler, J., D. Giles, and J. Braxton. 1997. The impact of service-learning on college students. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 4: 5-15.
10. Ferrari, J.R., and L.Worrall. 2000. Assessments by community agencies: How '' the other side'' sees service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 7: 35-40.
11. Gelmon, S., B. Holland, S. Seiffer, A. Shinnamon, and K. Conners. 1998. Communityuniversity partnerships for mutual learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 5: 97-107.
12. Giles, D., and J. Eyler. 1994. The impact of a college community service laboratory on students personal, social, and cognitive outcomes. Journal of adolescence 17, no. 4: 327-39.
13. Greene, D., and G. Diehm. 1995. Education and service outcome of a service integration effort. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 2: 54-62.
14. Jacoby, B. 2003. Building partnerships for service-learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Jorge, E. 2003. Outcomes for community partners in an unmediated service-learning program. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 10, no. 1: 28-38.
16. Keith, N. 1998. Community service for community building: The school-based service corps as border-crossers. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 5: 86-96.
17. Kezar, A., and R. Rhoads. 2001. The dynamic tensions of service learning in higher education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Higher Education 72, no. 2: 148-71.
18. Lewis, T. 2004. Service learning for social change? Lessons from a liberal arts college. American Sociological Association 32, no. 1: 94-108.
19. Mabry, B. 1998. Pedagogical variations in service-learning and student outcomes: How time, contact, and reflection matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 5: 32-47.
20. Marcus, G., J. Howard, and D. King. 1993. Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15: 410-9.
21. McKibben, B. 2007. Deep economy; the wealth of communities and the durable future. New York: Times Books.
22. McKnight, J. 1995. The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.
23. Miron, D., and B.E. Moely. 2006. Community agency voice and benefit in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 12: 27-37.
24. Mitchell, T. 2008. Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 14, no. 2: 50-65.
25. Sandy, M. 2007. Community voices: A California campus compact study on partnerships. San Francisco, CA: California Campus Compact.
26. Sax, L. and Astin, A. 1997. The benefits of service: Evidence from undergraduates. Educational Record, 78: 25-32.
27. Schmidt, A., and M.A. Robby. 2002. Whats the value of service-learning to the community? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 9, no. 1: 27-33.
28. Stanton, T.K. 1990. Liberal acts, experiential learning and public service: necessary ingredients for socially responsible undergraduate education. In Combining service and learning, eds. J.C. Kendal et al. Raleigh, NC: National Society for Internships and Experiential Education.
29. Stanton, T.K., D.E. Giles Jr., and N. Cruz. 1999. Service-learning: A movement's pioneers reflect on its origins, practice, and future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30. Strage, A. 2004. Long-term academic benefits of service-learning: When and where do they manifest themselves. College Student Journal 38: 257-62.
31. Strand, K., S. Marullo, N. Cutforth, R. Stoecker, and P. Donahue. 2003. Community-based research and higher education: Principles and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32. Vernon, A., and K. Ward. 1999. Campus and community partnerships: Assessing impacts & strengthening connections. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 6: 30-7.
33. Ward, K., and L. Wolf-Wendel. 2000. Community-centered service learning: Moving from doing for to doing with. American Behavioral Scientist 43: 767-80.
34. Zlotkowski, E., ed. 1998. Successful service-learning programs: New models of excellence in higher education. Bolton, MA: Anker.