Analysis of the disassortative mating pattern in a heterodichogamous plant, Acer mono Maxim. using microsatellite markers

Plant Ecology

Volumn 204, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 43-54

  Kikuchi, Satoshi ^a   Shibata, Mitsue ^a   Tanaka, Hiroshi ^a   Yoshimaru, Hiroshi ^a   Niiyama, Kaoru ^a  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acer mono; Disassortative mating; Heterodichogamy; Microsatellite; Paternity analysis; Pollination

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; COEXISTENCE; DECIDUOUS TREE; FLOWERING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; OUTCROSSING; PARENTAGE; PATERNITY; PHENOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ACER; ACER MONO;

EID: 70349847636     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-008-9564-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akaike H (1981) Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econom 16:3-14. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90071-3.
2. Asai T (2000) Dichogamy in fullmoon maple (Acer japonicum Thunb.). Bull Hokkaido For Res Inst 37:27-40 in Japanese.
3. Bacles CFE, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ et al (2005) Historical and contemporal mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 59:979-990.
4. Bai W, Zeng Y, Liao W et al (2006) Flowering phenology and wind-pollination efficacy of heterodichogamous Juglans mandshurica (Juglandaceae). Ann Bot (Lond) 98:397-402. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl111.
5. Bai W, Zeng Y, Zhang D (2007) Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a heterodichogamous tree, Juglans mandshurica (Juglandaceae). New Phytol 176:699-707. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02202.x.
6. De Jong PC (1994) Taxonomy and reproductive biology of maples. In: van Gelderen DM, de Jong PC, Oterdoom HJ (eds) Maples of the world. Timber Press, Portland, OR, USA, pp 69-103.
7. Degen B, Bandou E, Caron H (2004) Limited pollen dispersal and biparental inbreeding in Symphonia globulifera in French Guiana. Heredity 93:585-591. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800560.
8. Endress PK, Lorence DH (2004) Heterodichogamy of a novel type in Hernandia (Hernandiaceae) and its structural basis. Int J Plant Sci 165:753-763. doi:10.1086/422049.
9. Fénart S, Austerlitz F, Cuguen J et al (2007) Long distance pollen-mediated gene flow at a landscape level: The weed beet as a case study. Mol Ecol 16:3801-3813. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03448.x.
10. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI) (2003) Forest Dynamics Database. http://fddb.ffpri-108.affrc.go.jp/. Accessed 15 August 2007.
11. Gabriel WJ (1966) Reproductive behavior in sugar maple: Self-incompatibility, cross-compatibility, agamospermy, and agamocarpy. Silvae Genet 16:165-168.
12. Gleeson SK (1982) Heterodichogamy in walnuts: Inheritance and stable ratios. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 36:892-902. doi:10.2307/2408070.
13. Gleiser G, Verdú M (2005) Repeated evolution of dioecy from androdioecy in Acer. New Phytol 165:633-640. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01242.x.
14. Gleiser G, Segarra-Moragues JG, Pannel JR et al (2008) Siring success and paternal effects in heterodichogamous Acer opalus. Ann Bot (Lond) 101:1017-1026. doi:10.1093/aob/mcn030.
15. Goto S, Shimatani K, Yoshimaru H et al (2006) Fat-tailed gene flow in the dioecious canopy tree species Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica revealed by microsatellites. Mol Ecol 15:2985-2996.
16. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm.
17. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099-1106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x.
18. Kikuchi S, Shibata M (2008) Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers in Acer mono Maxim. Mol Ecol Notes 8:339-341.
19. Kikuzawa K, Mizui M, Seiwa K et al (1986) Relations between crown projection area and diameter growth in a deciduous broad-leaved forest in Hokkaido-Changes in the crown projection area for 12 years. Trans Meeting Hokkaido Br Jpn For Soc 34:36-37 (in Japanese).
20. Kimura M, Seiwa K, Suyama Y et al (2003) Flowering system of heterodichogamous Juglans ailanthifolia. Plant Species Biol 18:75-84. doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.2003.00088.x.
21. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB et al (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639-655. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x.
22. Masaki T, Suzuki W, Niiyama K et al (1992) Community structure of a species-rich temperate forest, Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan. Vegetatio 98:97-111. doi:10.1007/BF00045549.
23. Matsui K (1991) Pollination ecology of four Acer species in Japan with special reference to bee pollinators. Plant Species Biol 6:117-120. doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.1991.tb00218.x.
24. Mitigami Y, Mizui N, Kikuzawa K (1989) Flowering patterns and fruit characteristics of Acer mono. Trans Meeting Hokkaido Br Jpn For Soc 37:30-32 (in Japanese).
25. Mukai Y, Yamamoto N (1997) DNA and RNA isolation method of woody plants. In: Shimamoto K, Sasaki T (eds) PCR experimental protocols for plants. Shujunsha, Tokyo, pp 57-62 in Japanese.
26. Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:4321-4325. doi:10.1093/nar/8.19.4321.
27. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Austerlitz F (2005) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Mol Ecol 14:4441-4452.
28. Pandey M, Gailing O, Fischer D et al (2004) Characterization of microsatellite markers in sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.). Mol Ecol Notes 4:253-255. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00633.x.
29. Pendleton RL, McArthur ED, Freeman DC et al (1988) Heterodichogamy in Grayia brandegei (Chenopodiaceae): Report from a new family. Am J Bot 75:267-274. doi:10.2307/2443893.
30. Renner SS (2001) How common is heterodichogamy? Trends Ecol Evol 16:595-597. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02280-7.
31. Sato T (2002) Phenology of sex expression and gender variation in a heterodichogamous maple, Acer japonicum. Ecology 83:1226-1238.
32. Shibata S, Kikuchi S, Tanaka H, et al. (in press) Effects of population density, sex morph, and tree size on reproduction in a heterodichogamous maple, Acer mono, in a temperate forest of Japan. Ecol Res.
33. Tanaka H (1995) Seed demography of three co-occurring Acer species in a Japanese temperate deciduous forest. J Veg Sci 6:887-896. doi:10.2307/3236403.
34. Tanaka H, Shibata M, Masaki T et al (2008) Comparative demography of three coexisting Acer species in gaps and under closed canopy. J Veg Sci 19:127-138.
35. Terui H, Lian CL, Saito Y et al (2006) Development of microsatellite markers in Acer capillipes. Mol Ecol Notes 6:77-79. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01144.x.
36. van Gelderen DM (1994) Maple species and infraspecific taxa. In: van Gelderen DM, De Jong PC, Oterdoom HJ (eds) Maples of the world. Timber Press, Portland, OR, USA, pp 105-240.
37. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 38:1358-1370. doi:10.2307/2408641.
38. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002) Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: An example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2038-2042. doi:10.1073/pnas.042649999.