Flowering phenology and wind-pollination efficacy of heterodichogamous Juglans mandshurica (Juglandaceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 397-402

  Bai, Wei Ning ^a   Zeng, Yan Fei ^a   Liao, Wan Jin ^a   Zhang, Da Yong ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Heterodichogamy; Juglans mandshurica; Pollination efficacy; Protandry; Protogyny

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; FRUIT PRODUCTION; MATING SUCCESS; NUT; OUTCROSSING; PHENOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; WALNUT;

BREEDING; FLOWERS; JUGLANS; PERIODICITY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

JUGLANDACEAE; JUGLANS; JUGLANS MANDSHURICA;

EID: 33748140702     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl111     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allison TD. 1990. The influence of deer browsing on the reproductive biology of Canada yew (Taxus canadensis Marsh.). II. Pollen limitation: an indirect effect. Oecologia 83: 530-534.
2. Asai T. 2000. Dichogamy in fullmoon maple (Acer japonicum Thunb.). Bulletin of the Hokaido Forestry Research Institute 37: 27-40.
3. Burd M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60: 83-139.
4. Dafni A, Firmage D. 2000. Pollen viability and longevity: practical, ecological and evolutionary implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 113-132.
5. Darwin C. 1889. Different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Co.
6. Delpino F. 1874. Ulteriori osservazioni e considerazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale. Appendice. Dimorfismo nel noce (Juglans regia) e pleiontismo nelle piante. Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale (Milan) 17: 402-407.
7. Dommee B, Bompar J-L, Dnelle N. 1990. Sexual tetramorphism in Thymelaea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae): evidence of the pathway from heterodichogamy to dioecy at the infraspecific level. American Journal of Botany 77: 1449-1462.
8. Endress PK, Lorence DH. 2004. Heterodichogamy of a novel type in Hernandia (Hernandiaceae) and its structural basis. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 753-763.
9. Errera L, Gevaert G. 1878. Sur la structure et les mode de fecondation des fleurs. Societe Royale de Botanique de Belgique, 17: 38-181.
10. Gabriel WJ. 1968. Dichogamy in Acer saccharum. Botanical Gazette 129: 334-338.
11. Gleeson SK. 1982. Heterodichogamy in walnuts: inheritance and stable ratios. Evolution 36: 892-902.
12. Holm S. 1994. Reproductive variability and pollen limitation in three Betula taxa in nothern Sweden. Ecography 17: 73-81.
13. Kimura M, Seiwa K, Suyama Y, Ueno N. 2003. Flowering system of heterodichogamous Juglans ailanthifolia. Plant Species Biology 18: 75-84.
14. Knapp EE. 2001. Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia 128: 48-55.
15. Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, et al. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 467-497.
16. Knuth P. 1906. Handbook of flower pollination (English translation), 3 volumes. London: Clarendon Press.
17. Li HT, Chen LZ. 1999. Study on the microclimate in the mountain forest in the warm temperate zone. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 23: 139-147.
18. Li Q-J, Xu Z-F, Kress W, Xia Y-M, Zhang L, Deng X-B, et al. 2001. Flexible style that encourages outcrossing. Nature 410: 432
19. McCarthy BC, Quinn JA. 1990. Reproductive ecology of system of two sympatric tree species. American Journal of Botany 77: 261-273.
20. Muller H. 1875. Flowering of the hazel. Nature 12: 26
21. Nilsson SG, Wastljung U. 1987. Seed predation and cross-pollination in mast-seeding beech (Fagus sylvatica) patches. Ecology 68: 260-265.
22. Pendleton RL, McArthur ED, Freeman DC, Blauer AC. 1988. Heterodichogamy in Grayia brandegei (Chenopodiaceae): report from a new family. American Journal of Botany 75: 267-274.
23. Perry DJ, Knowles P. 1990. Evidence of high self-fertilization in natural populations of eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis). Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 663-668.
24. Proctor M, Yeo P. 1972. The pollination of flowers. New York, NY: Taplinger.
25. Renner SS. 2001. How common is heterodichogamy? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 595-597.
26. Rink G, Zhang G, Jinghua Z, Kung FH, Carroll ER. 1994. Mating parameters in Juglans nigra L. seed orchard similar to natural population estimates. Silvae Genetica 43: 261-263.
27. Rodriguez-Riano T, Dafni A. 2000. A new procedure to assess pollen viability. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12: 241-244.
28. Satake A, Iwasa Y. 2002. Spatially limited pollen exchange and a long-range synchronization of trees. Ecology 83: 993-1005.
29. Sato T. 2002. Phenology of sex expression and gender variation in a heterodichogamous maple, Acer japonicum. Ecology 83: 1226-1238.
30. Sork VL. 2002. Pollen movement in declining populations of California valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Molecular Ecology 11: 1657-1668.
31. Sprugel DG, Hinckley TM, Schaap W. 1991. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 309-334.
32. Stout AB. 1928. Dichogamy in flowering plants. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Club 55: 141-153.
33. Thompson TE, Romberg LD. 1985. Inheritance of heterodichogamy in pecan. Journal of Heredity 76: 456-458.
34. Victory ER, Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OE, Woeste K. 2006. Genetic homogeneity in Juglans nigra (Juglandaceae) at nuclear microsatellites. American Journal of Botany 93: 118-126.
35. Webb CJ. 1984. Pollination specialization and protogyny in Myrrhidendron donellsmithii (Umbelliferae). Systematic Botany 9: 240-246.
36. Whitehead D. 1983. Wind pollination: some ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: Real L, ed. Pollination biology. New York, NY: Academic Press, 97-108.
37. Wood MN. 1934. Pollination and blooming habits of the Persian walnut in California. US Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 387.
38. Zimmerman M, Pyke GH. 1988. Reproduction in Polemounium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. American Naturalist 131: 723-728.