Phenology of sex expression and gender variation in a heterodichogamous maple, Acer japonicum

Ecology

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1226-1238

  Sato, Toshihiko ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acer japonicum; Floral sex allocation; Gender expression in plants; Heterodichogamy; Maple; Phenology of sex expression; Phenotypic gender; Size advantage model

Indexed keywords

PHENOLOGY; PROTANDRY; PROTOGYNY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX ALLOCATION;

ACER; ACER JAPONICUM; SAPINDACEAE;

EID: 0012127216     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1226:POSEAG]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ågren, J., and D. W. Schemske. 1995. Sex allocation in the monoecious herb Begonia semiovata. Evolution 49:121-130.
2. Asai, T. 2000. Dichogamy in fullmoon maple (Acer japonicum THUMB.) [in Japanese with English summary]. Bulletin of the Hokkaido Forest Research Institute 37:27-40.
3. Atlan, A., P. H. Gouyon, D. Fournial, and D. Couvet. 1992. Sex allocation in a hermaphroditic plant: the case of gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5:189-203.
4. Baker, P. A., D. C. Freeman, and K. T. Harper. 1982. Variation in the breeding system of Acer grandidentatum. Forest Science 28:563-572.
5. Barrett, S. C. 1992. Gender variation and the evolution of dioecy in Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5:423-444.
6. Beach, J. H., and K. S. Bawa. 1980. Role of pollinators in the evolution of dioecy from distyly. Evolution 34:1138-1142.
7. Bertin, R. I. 1982. The ecology of sex expression in red buckeye. Ecology 63:445-456.
8. Bertin, R. I., and M. A. Kerwin. 1998. Floral sex ratios and gynomonoecy in Aster (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 85:235-244.
9. Brunet, J., and D. Charlesworth. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49:70-79.
10. Burd, M., and T. F. H. Allen. 1988. Sexual allocation strategy in wind-pollinated plants. Evolution 42:403-407.
11. Campbell, D. R. 1992. Variation in sex allocation and floral morphology in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 79:516-521.
12. Campbell, D. R. 1997. Genetic correlation between biomass allocation to male and female functions in a natural population of Ipomopsis aggregata. Heredity 79:606-614.
13. Campbell, D. R. 2000. Experimental test of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:227-232.
14. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1978. Population genetics of partial male-sterility and the evolution of monoecy and dioecy. Heredity 41:137-153.
15. Charnov, E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
16. Cruden, R. W., and D. L. Lyon. 1985. Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems. Oecologia 66:299-306.
17. Dawson, T. E., and M. A. Geber. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. Pages 175-215 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Bawson, and L. F. Delph. editors. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
18. de Jong, P. C. 1976. Flowering and sex expression in Acer L. A biosystematic study. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
19. de Jong, T. J., and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1989. Size-dependency of sex-allocation in hermaphroditic, monocarpic plants. Functional Ecology 3:201-206.
20. Dommée, B., A. Biascamano, N. Denelle, J.-L. Bompar, and J. D. Thompson. 1995. Sexual tetramorphism in Thymelaea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae): morph ratios in open-pollinated progeny. American Journal of Botany 82:734-740.
21. Dommée, B., J.-L. Bompar, and N. Denelle. 1990. Sexual tetramorphism in Thymelaea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae): evidence of the pathway from heterodichogamy to dioecy at the interspecific level. American Journal of Botany 77:1449-1462.
22. Dowrick, V. P. J. 1956. Heterostyly and homostyly in Primula obconica. Heredity 10:219-236.
23. Fenster, C. B., and D. E. Carr. 1997. Genetics of sex allocation in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10:641-661.
24. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford, UK.
25. Fox, J. F. 1993. Size and sex allocation in monoecious woody plants. Oecologia 94:110-113.
26. Freeman, D. C., K. T. Harper, and E. L. Charnov. 1980. Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia 47:222-232.
27. Freeman, D. C., L. J. Klikoff. and K. T. Harper. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193:597-599.
28. Freeman, D. C., E. D. McArthur, K. T. Harper, and A. C. Blauer. 1981. Influence of environment on the floral sex ratio of monoecious plants. Evolution 35:194-197.
29. Gabriel, W. J. 1968. Dichogamy in Acer saccharum. Botanical Gazette 129:334-338.
30. Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 44:189-208.
31. Gleeson, S. K. 1982. Heterodichogamy in walnuts: inheritance and stable ratios. Evolution 36:892-902.
32. Goldman, D. A., and M. F. Willson. 1986. Sex allocation in functionally hermaphroditic plants: a review and critique. Botanical Review 52:157-194.
33. Hibbs, D. E., and B. C. Fisher. 1979. Sexual and vegetative reproduction of striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum L.). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 106:222-227.
34. Horovitz, A. 1978. Is the hermaphrodite flowering plant equisexual? American Journal of Botany 65:485-486.
35. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., T. J. de Jong, and H. Metz. 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:260-265.
36. Lloyd, D. G. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18:103-108.
37. Lloyd, D. G. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. Pages 233-252 in R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan. editors. Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer. Sunderland. Massachusetts. USA.
38. Lloyd, D. G., and K. S. Bawa. 1984. Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evolutionary Biology 17:255-338.
39. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24:135-162.
40. Lovett Doust, J., and P. B. Cavers. 1982. Biomass allocation in hermaphrodite flowers. Canadian Journal of Botany 60:2530-2534.
41. Matsui, K. 1991. Pollination ecology of four Acer species in Japan with special reference to bee pollinators. Plant Species Biology 6:117-120.
42. Matsui, K. 1995. Sex expression, sex change and fruiting habit in an Acer rufinerve population. Ecoiogical Research 10:65-74.
43. Méndez, M. 1998. Modification of phenotypic and functional gender in the monoecious Arum italicum (Araceae). American Journal of Botany 85:225-234.
44. Ogata, K. 1967. A systematic study of the genus Acer. Bulletin of the Tokyo University Forest 63:89-206.
45. Ornduff, R. 1966. The origin of dioecism from heterostyly in Nymphoides (Menyanthaceae). Evolution 20:309-314.
46. Pendleton, R. L., D. C. Freeman, E. D. McArthur, and S. C. Sanderson. 2000. Gender specialization in heterodichogamous Grayia brandegei (Chenopodiaceae): evidence for an alternative pathway to dioecy. American Journal of Botany 87:508-516.
47. Pendleton, R. L., E. D. McArthur, D. C. Freeman, and A. C. Blauer. 1988. Heterodichogamy in Grayia brandegei (Chenopodiaceae): report from a new family. American Journal of Botany 75:267-274.
48. Policansky, D. 1981. Sex choice and the size advantage model in Jack-in-the-pulpit (Arisaema triphyllum). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 78:1306-1308.
49. Primack, R. B., and C. McCall. 1986. Gender variation in a red maple population (Acer rubrum; Aceraceae): a seven-year sturdy of a "polygamodioecious species." American Journal of Botany 73:1239-1248.
50. Ross, M., D. 1980. Components of fitness and frequency-dependent overdominance in hermaphrodite plants. Evolution 34:769-778.
51. Sachs, L. 1984. Applied statistics. A handbook of techniques. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
52. Sakai, A. K. 1990. Sex ratios of red maple (Acer rubrum) populations in northern lower Michigan. Ecology 71:571-580.
53. SAS. 1991. SAS system for linear models. Third edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
54. Sato, T. 2000. Effects of rodent gnawing on the survival of current-year seedlings of Quercus crispula. Ecological Research 15:335-344.
55. Schuster, C. E. 1924. Filberts. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 208.
56. Seber, G. A. F., and C. J. Wild. 1989. Nonlinear regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
57. Webb, C. J. 1999. Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. Pages 61-95 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, editors. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
58. Yampolsky, C., and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genetica 3:1-62.