Dissociating the effects of angular disparity and image similarity in mental rotation and object recognition

Cognition

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 128-133

  Cheung, Olivia S ^a   Hayward, William G ^b   Gauthier, Isabel ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Mental rotation; Object recognition; Viewpoint effects; Visual similarity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGULAR DISPARITY; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SIMILARITY; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349776058     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Biederman I., and Gerhardstein P.C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 6 (1993) 1162-1182
2. Bonda E., Petrides M., Frey S., and Evans A. Neural correlates of mental transformations of the body-in-space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92 24 (1995) 11180-11184
3. Bülthoff H.H., and Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89 (1992) 60-64
4. Cooper L.A., and Shepard R.N. Chronometric studies of the rotation of visual images. In: Chase W.G. (Ed). Visual information processing (1973), Academic Press, New York 75-176
5. Cooper L.A., and Shepard R.N. Mental transformations in the identification of left and right hands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 104 1 (1975) 48-56
6. Corballis M.C. Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review 95 1 (1988) 115-123
7. Corballis M.C., and McLaren R. Winding one's Ps and Qs: Mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 2 (1984) 318-327
8. Curby K.M., Hayward W.G., and Gauthier I. Laterality effects in the recognition of depth-rotated novel objects. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 4 1 (2004) 100-111
9. De Caro S.A., and Reeves A. Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: Evidence from a backward-masking/dual-task procedure. Perception and Psychophysics 62 7 (2000) 1356-1366
10. Edelman S., and Bülthoff H.H. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research 32 12 (1992) 2385-2400
11. Gauthier I., Hayward W.G., Tarr M.J., Anderson A.W., Skudlarski P., and Gore J.C. BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron 34 1 (2002) 161-171
12. Harris I.M., and Dux P.E. Orientation-invariant object recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Cognition 95 1 (2005) 73-93
13. Hayward W.G. Effects of outline shape in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 2 (1998) 427-440
14. Hayward W.G., and Williams P. Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychological Science 11 1 (2000) 7-12
15. Hayward W.G., Zhou G., Gauthier I., and Harris I.M. Dissociating viewpoint costs in mental rotation and object recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 5 (2006) 820-825
16. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition 13 4 (1985) 289-303
17. Jolicoeur P. Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 2 (1990) 351-364
18. Kosslyn S.M. Image and brain (1994), MIT Press, Cambrige
19. Lawson R. View sensitivity increases for same-shape matches if mismatches show pairs of more similar shapes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 5 (2004) 896-902
20. Lawson R., and Humphreys G. View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 2 (1996) 395-416
21. Lawson R., and Jolicoeur P. Recognition thresholds for plane-rotated pictures of familiar objects. Acta Psychologica 112 1 (2003) 17-41
22. Logothetis N., Pauls J., Bülthoff H., and Poggio T. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology 4 5 (1994) 401-414
23. Perrett D.I., Oram M.W., and Ashbridge E. Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition 67 (1998) 111-145
24. Poggio T., and Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343 6255 (1990) 263-266
25. Richter W., Ugurbil K., Georgopoulous A., and Kim S.-G. Time-resolved fMRI of mental rotation. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 3697-3702
26. Schendan H.E., and Stern C.E. Mental rotation and object categorization share a common network of prefrontal and dorsal and ventral regions of posterior cortex. Neuroimage 35 3 (2007) 1264-1277
27. Schwoebel J., and Srinivas K. Recognizing objects seen from novel viewpoints: Effects of view similarity and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26 4 (2000) 915-928
28. Shepard R.N., and Cooper J.A. Mental images and their transformations (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
29. Shepard R.N., and Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171 972 (1971) 701-703
30. Tagaris G.A., Kim S.-G., Strupp J.P., Anderson P., Ugurbil K., and Georgopoulos A.P. Mental rotation studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging at high field (4 Tesla): Performance and cortical activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 4 (1997) 419-432
31. Tarr M.J. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 1 (1995) 55-82
32. Ullman S. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition 32 3 (1989) 193-254
33. Vanrie J., Béatse E., Wagemans J., Sunaert S., and Van Hecke P. Mental rotation versus invariant features in object perception from different viewpoints: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 917-930
34. Vanrie J., Willems B., and Wagemans J. Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: Mental rotation versus invariant features. Perception 30 (2001) 1047-1056
35. Wexler M., Kosslyn S.M., and Berthoz A. Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition 68 (1998) 77-94
36. Wilson K.D., and Farah M.J. Distinct patterns of viewpoint-dependent BOLD activity during common-object recognition and mental rotation. Perception 35 10 (2006) 1351-1366
37. Zhang, L., & Cottrell, G. W. (2005). Holistic processing develops because it is good. In Proceedings of the 27th annual cognitive science conference, Stresa, Italy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.