Heteronuclear decoupling by optimal tracking

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 201, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-17

  Neves, Jorge L ^a   Heitmann, Björn ^a   Khaneja, Navin ^b   Glaser, Steffen J ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Average Hamiltonian theory; GRAPE algorithm; Heteronuclear decoupling; Optimal control theory; Tracking

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE HAMILTONIAN THEORY; GRAPE ALGORITHM; HETERONUCLEAR DECOUPLING; OPTIMAL CONTROL THEORY; TRACKING;

CONTROL THEORY; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; SPIN DYNAMICS; SYSTEM THEORY;

OPTIMIZATION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 70349754193     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: 10960856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Levitt M.H., Freeman R., and Frenkiel T.A. Broadband decoupling in high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. Adv. Magn. Reson. 11 (1983) 47-110
2. Shaka A.J., and Keeler J. Broadband spin decoupling in isotropic liquids. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 19 (1987) 47-129
3. Anderson W.A., and Freeman R. Influence of a second radiofrequency field on high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. J. Chem. Phys. 37 (1962) 85-103
4. Ernst R.R. Nuclear magnetic double resonance with an incoherent radio-frequency field. J. Chem. Phys. 45 (1966) 3845-3861
5. Levitt M.H., Freeman R., and Frenkiel T. Broadband heteronuclear decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. 47 (1982) 328-330
6. Waugh J.S. Theory of broadband spin decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. 50 (1982) 30-49
7. Shaka A.J., Keeler J., Frenkiel T., and Freeman R. An improved sequence for broadband decoupling: WALTZ-16. J. Magn. Reson. 52 (1983) 335-338
8. Shaka A.J., Barker P.B., and Freeman R. Computer-optimized decoupling scheme for wideband applications and low-level operation. J. Magn. Reson. 64 (1985) 547-552
9. Fujiwara T., and Nagayama K. Composite inversion pulses with frequency switching and their application to broadband decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. 77 (1988) 53-63
10. Zuiderweg E.R.P., and Fesik S.W. Band-selective heteronuclear decoupling using shaped pulses as an aid in measuring long-range heteronuclear coupling constants. J. Magn. Reson. 93 (1991) 653-658
11. Eggenberger U., Schmidt P., Sattler M., Glaser S.J., and Griesinger C. Frequency-selective decoupling with recursively expanded soft pulses in multinuclear NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 100 (1992) 604-610
12. McCoy M.A., and Mueller L. Selective decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. A 101 (1993) 122-130
13. Starcuk Jr. Z., Bartusek K., and Starcuk Z. Heteronuclear broadband spin-flip decoupling with adiabatic pulses. J. Magn. Reson. A 107 (1994) 24-31
14. Bendall M.R. Broadband and narrowband spin decoupling using adiabatic spin flips. J. Magn. Reson. A 112 (1995) 26-129
15. Skinner T.E., and Bendall M.R. Peak power and efficiency in hyperbolic secant decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. A 123 (1995) 111-115
16. Kupce E., and Freeman R. Optimized adiabatic pulses for wideband spin inversion. J. Magn. Reson. A 118 (1996) 299-303
17. Fu R., and Bodenhausen G. Evaluation of adiabatic frequency-modulated schemes for broadband decoupling in isotropic liquids. J. Magn. Reson. A 119 (1996) 129-133
18. Geen H. Theoretical design of amplitude-modulated pulses for spin decoupling in nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Phys. B 29 (1996) 1699-1710
19. de Graaf R.A. Theoretical and experimental evaluation of broadband decoupling techniques for in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 53 (2005) 1297-1306
20. Levitt M.H., Freeman R., and Frenkiel T. Supercycles for broadband heteronuclear decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. 50 (1982) 157-160
21. Tycko R. Iterative methods in the design of pulse sequences for NMR excitation. Adv. Magn. Reson. 15 (1990)
22. Kotyk J.J., Garbow J.R., and Gullion T. Improvements in proton-detected NMR spectroscopy using spin-flip decoupling. An application to heteronuclear chemical shift correlation. J. Magn. Reson. 89 (1990) 647-653
23. Haeberlen U. High resolution NMR in solids: selective averaging. Adv. Magn. Reson. Suppl. 1 (1976)
24. Bryson Jr. A., and Ho Y.-C. Applied Optimal Control (1975), Hemisphere, Washington, DC
25. Reiss T.O., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Time-optimal coherence-order-selective transfer of in-phase coherence in heteronuclear IS spin systems. J. Magn. Reson. 154 (2002) 192-195
26. Khaneja N., Kramer F., and Glaser S.J. Optimal experiments for maximizing coherence transfer between coupled spins. J. Magn. Reson. 173 (2005) 116-124
27. Stefanatos D., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Optimal control of coupled spins in presence of longitudinal relaxation. Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 022319
28. Früh D.P., Ito T., Li J.S., Wagner G., Glaser S.J., and Khaneja N. Sensitivity enhancement in NMR of macromolecules by application of optimal control theory. J. Biomol. NMR 32 (2005) 23-30
29. Khaneja N., Reiss T., Kehlet C., Schulte-Herbrüggen T., and Glaser S.J. Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. J. Magn. Reson. 172 (2005) 296-305
30. Tošner Z., Vosegaard T., Kehlet C., Khaneja N., Glaser S.J., and Nielsen N.C. Optimal control in NMR spectroscopy: numerical implementation in SIMPSON. J. Magn. Reson. 197 (2009) 120-134
31. Skinner T.E., Reiss T.O., Luy B., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Reducing the duration of broadband excitation pulses using optimal control with limited rf amplitude. J. Magn. Reson. 167 (2004) 68-74
32. Skinner T.E., Reiss T.O., Luy B., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Tailoring the optimal control cost function to a desired output: application to minimizing phase errors in short broadband excitation pulses. J. Magn. Reson. 172 (2005) 7-23
33. Kobzar K., Skinner T.E., Khaneja N., Glaser S.J., and Luy B. Exploring the limits of broadband excitation and inversion pulses. J. Magn. Reson. 170 (2004) 236-243
34. Kobzar K., Luy B., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Pattern pulses: design of arbitrary excitation profiles as a function of pulse amplitude and offset. J. Magn. Reson. 173 (2005) 229-235
35. Skinner T.E., Kobzar K., Luy B., Bendall R., Bermel W., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Optimal control design of constant amplitude phase-modulated pulses: application to calibration-free broadband excitation. J. Magn. Reson. 179 (2006) 241-249
36. Neves J.L., Heitmann B., Reiss T.O., Schor H.H.R., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Exploring the limits of polarization transfer efficiency in homonuclear three spin systems. J. Magn. Reson. 181 (2006) 126-134
37. Gershenzon N.I., Kobzar K., Luy B., Glaser S.J., and Skinner T.E. Optimal control design of excitation pulses that accommodate relaxation. J. Magn. Reson. 188 (2007) 330-336
38. Kobzar K., Skinner T.E., Khaneja N., Glaser S.J., and Luy B. Exploring the limits of excitation and inversion pulses II. RF-power optimized pulses. J. Magn. Reson. 194 (2008) 58-66
39. Tošner Z., Glaser S.J., Khaneja N., and Nielsen N.C. Effective Hamiltonians by optimal control: solid-state NMR double-quantum planar and isotropic dipolar recoupling. J. Chem. Phys. 125 (2006) 1-10
40. Schulte-Herbrüggen T., Spörl A., Khaneja N., and Glaser S.J. Optimal control-based efficient synthesis of building blocks of quantum algorithms seen in perspective from network complexity towards time complexity. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 1-7
41. Fisher R., Yuan H., Spörl A., and Glaser S. Time-optimal generation of cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 79 (2009) 042304
42. Brockett R.W. Finite Dimensional Linear Systems (1970), John Wiley & Sons, New York
43. Hirschorn R.M., and Davis J.H. Global output tracking for nonlinear systems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 26 (1988) 1321-1330
44. Gross P., Singh H., Rabitz H., Mease K., and Huang G.H. Inverse quantum-mechanical control: a means for design and a test of intuition. Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 4593-4604
45. Sugawara M. General formulation of locally designed control theory for quantum system. J. Chem. Phys. 118 (2003) 6784-6800
46. Zhu W., and Rabitz H. Quantum control design via adaptive tracking. J. Chem. Phys. 119 (2003) 3619-3625
47. Wenin M., and Pötz W. Optimal control of a single qubit by direct inversion. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 022319
48. R.W. Brockett, Characteristic phenomena and model problems in nonlinear control, in: Proc. of the 1996 IFAC Congress, vol. G, 1996, pp. 135-140.
49. K. Morgansen, R.W. Brockett, Nonholonomic control based on approximate inversion, in: Proc. of the 1999 American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, 1999, pp. 3515-3519.
50. Ohtsuki Y., Turinici G., and Rabitz H. Generalized monotonically convergent algorithm for solving quantum optimal control problems. J. Chem. Phys. 120 (2004) 5509-5517
51. Serban I., Werschnik J., and Gross E.K.U. Optimal control of time-dependent targets. Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 053810
52. Werschnik J., and Gross E.K.U. Quantum optimal control theory. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 (2005) R175-R211
53. Jirari H., and Pötz W. Quantum optimal control theory and dynamical coupling in the spin-boson model. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 022306
54. Palao J.P., Kosloff R., and Koch C.P. Protecting coherence in optimal control theory: state-dependent constraint approach. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 063412
55. Ernst R.R., Bodenhausen G., and Wokaun A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions (1987), Clarendon Press, Oxford
56. n systems during arbitrary rf irradiation of the I spins. J. Magn. Reson. 141 (1999) 271-285
57. Bendall M.R., and Skinner T.E. Comparison and use of vector and quantum descriptions of J coupled spin evolution during RF irradiation of one spin in an IS spin system. J. Magn. Reson. 143 (2000) 329-351
58. n systems: product operator solutions and applications. Conc. Magn. Reson. 14 (2002) 287-307
59. Santos L.F., and Viola L. Advantages of randomization in coherent quantum dynamical control. New J. Phys. 10 (2008) 083009
60. Kern O., and Alber G. Controlling quantum systems by embedded dynamical decoupling schemes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 250501
61. Santos L.F., and Viola L. Enhanced convergence and robust performance of randomized dynamical decoupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 150501
62. Viola L., and Lloyd S. Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 2733-2744
63. Khodjasteh K., and Lidar D.A. Fault-tolerant quantum dynamical decoupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 180501
64. Rossini D., Facchi P., Fazio R., Florio G., Lidar D.A., Pascazio S., Plastina F., and Zanardi P. Bang-bang control of a qubit coupled to a quantum critical spin bath. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 052112
65. Shaka A.J., Barker P.B., and Freeman R. Three-spin effects in broadband decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. 71 (1987) 520-531
66. Suter D., Schenker V., and Pines A. Theory of broadband heteronuclear decoupling in multispin systems. J. Magn. Reson. 73 (1987) 90-98