Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 908-915

  Gordin, Arie ^a   Papsin, Blake ^a   James, Adrian ^a   Gordon, Karen ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavioral thresholds; Cochlear implants; Electrophysiological thresholds; Precurved array

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REFLEX, ACOUSTIC; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STAPEDIUS;

EID: 70349742701     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b236b0     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Zeng FG. Trends in cochlear implants. Trend Amplif 2004;8:1-34.
2. Kennedy DW. Multichannel intracochlear electrodes: mechanisms of insertion trauma. Laryngoscope 1987;97:42-49
3. Shephard RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993;66:108-120 (Pubitemid 23102403)
4. Frijns JHM, De Snoo SL, Ten Kate JH. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 1996;95:33-48.
5. Smullen JL, Polak M, Hodges AV, et al. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2005;115:977-982 (Pubitemid 40776985)
6. Pfingst BE, Holloway LA, Zwolan TA, Collins LM. Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants. Hear Res 1999;134:105-115
7. Hughes ML, Abbas PJ. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;119:1538-1547 (Pubitemid 43326023)
8. Tykocinski M, Saunders E, Cohen LT, Treaba C, Briggs RJS. The Contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:33-41. (Pubitemid 32184311)
9. Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, et al. Threshold, comfortable level, and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Ear Hear 2002;23:28S-40S. (Pubitemid 34195172)
10. Firszt JB, Wackym PA, Gaggl W, Burg LS, Reeder RM. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode. Ear Hear 2003;24:184-190 (Pubitemid 36403012)
11. Parkinson AJ, Arcaroli J, Staller SJ, et al. The Nucleus 24 Contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002;23:41S-8S. (Pubitemid 34195173)
12. Polak M, Hodges A, Balkany T. ECAP, ESR and subjective levels for two different Nucleus 24 electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:639-645 (Pubitemid 41026088)
13. Fitzgerald MB, Shapiro WH, McDonald PD, et al. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:378-383 (Pubitemid 46572878)
14. Brown CJ. Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:383-387 (Pubitemid 37176011)
15. Bresnihan M, Norman G, Scott F, Viani L. Measurement of comfort levels by means of electrical stapedial reflex in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:963-966 (Pubitemid 32720397)
16. Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Ruth RA, et al. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:255-261
17. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear 2004;25:447-463 (Pubitemid 39332008)
18. Roland JT. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1325-1339
19. Hughes ML, Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, and behavioral measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2001;22:471-486
20. Rattay F, Leao RN, Felix H. A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability. Hear Res 2001;153:64-79.
21. Huang TC, Reitzen SD, Marrinan MS, et al. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after Cochlear implantation using the Nucleus Contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:159-166
22. Propst EJ, Papsin BC, Stockley TL, et al. Auditory responses in cochlear implant users with and without GJB2 deafness. Laryngoscope 2006;116:317-327
23. Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, et al. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2811-2824 (Pubitemid 39531342)
24. Echteler SM, Nofsinger YC. Development of ganglion cell topography in the postnatal cochlea. J Comp Neurol 2000;425:436-446 (Pubitemid 30659208)
25. Polak M, Hodges AV, King JE, Balkany TJ. Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants. Hear Res 2004;188:104-116 (Pubitemid 38169244)
26. Cohen LT, Saunders E, Knight R, Cowan RSC. Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contouri and straight Nucleus electrode arrays. Hear Res 2006;212:160-175 (Pubitemid 43254946)
27. Bacciu AA, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, et al. Comparison of speech perception performance between the nucleus 24 and nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant systems. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:1155-1158 (Pubitemid 40051565)
28. Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear. 2007;28:75S-9S. (Pubitemid 46673666)