A cluster of microcalcifications: Women with high risk for breast cancer versus other women

Breast Cancer

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 307-314

  Uematsu, Takayoshi ^a   Kasami, Masako ^a   Yuen, Sachiko ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; High risk; Mammography; Microcalcification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR BIOPSY; VACUUM EXTRACTION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURVIVAL RATE; VACUUM;

EID: 70349694076     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0100-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Morrow M, Schnitt SJ, Harris JR. Ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma. In: Harris JR, editor. Disease of the breast. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2000. p. 383-401.
2. T Uematsu S Yuen M Kasami Y Uchida 2007 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat 103 269 81 17063274 10.1007/s10549-006-9373- y (Pubitemid 46944506)
3. U Kettritz G Morack T Decker 2005 Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations Eur J Radiol 55 270 6 16036159 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.10.014 (Pubitemid 40982448)
4. WA Berg CL Arnoldus E Teferra M Bhargavan 2001 Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy Radiology 221 495 503 11687695 10.1148/radiol.2212010164 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnjvFCmsg%3D%3D
5. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
6. ES Burnside JE Ochsner KJ Fowler KJ Fine LR Salkowski DL Rubin, et al. 2007 Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy Radiology 242 388 95 17255409 10.1148/radiol.2422052130 (Pubitemid 46146191)
7. CD Lehman JD Blume P Weatherall Thickman N Hylton E Warner 2005 Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance Cancer 103 1898 905 15800894 10.1002/cncr.20971 (Pubitemid 40563263)
8. EA Sickles 1991 Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3, 184 consecutive cases Radiology 179 463 8 2014293 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7psFGhsg%3D%3D
9. A Evans S Pinder R Wilson M Sibbering D Poller C Elston, et al. 1994 Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings Am J Roentgenol 162 1307 11 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3kvFGisQ%3D%3D
10. A Evans 2003 The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: radiological diagnosis Breast Cancer Res 5 250 3 12927034 10.1186/bcr621 (Pubitemid 37080854)
11. D Saslow C Boetes W Burke S Harms MO Leach CD Lehman, et al. 2007 American cancer society guidelines for screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J Clin 57 75 89 17392385 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 (Pubitemid 46535708)
12. L Liberman AF Abramson FB Squires JR Glassman EA Morris DD Dershaw 1998 The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories Am J Roentgenol 171 35 40 1:STN:280:DyaK1czhtFSqsQ%3D%3D
13. CJ D'Orsi 2007 BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues Radiol Clin N Am 45 751 63 17888766 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.003 (Pubitemid 47410059)
14. DL Page LW Rogers 1992 Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia Hum Pathol 23 1095 7 1328030 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90026-Y 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FhtlOmtg%3D%3D
15. FA Tavassoli HJ Norris 1990 A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast Cancer 65 518 29 2297643 10.1002/1097-0142(19900201)65:3<518::AID- CNCR2820650324>3.0.CO;2-O 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7isVWhsQ%3D%3D
16. D Dershaw 2003 Does LCIS or ALH without other high-risk lesions diagnosed on core biopsy require surgical excision? Breast J 9 1 3 12558662 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09101.x (Pubitemid 36176455)
17. MA Cohen 2004 Cancer upgrades at excisional biopsy after diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: some reasons why? Radiology 231 617 21 15163803 10.1148/radiol.2313040154 (Pubitemid 38668074)
18. PC Stomper SP Cholewinski RB Penetrante JP Harlos TN Tsangaris 1993 Atypical hyperplasia: frequency and mammographic and pathologic relationships in excisional biopsies guided with mammography and clinical examination Radiology 189 667 71 8234688 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Flt1GrtQ%3D%3D
19. DL Page WD Dupont LW Rogers MS Rados 1985 Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow up study Cancer 55 2698 708 2986821 10.1002/1097-0142(19850601)55:11<2698::AID-CNCR2820551127>3.0.CO;2-A 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3gtFemtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 15092160)
20. DJ Winchester JR Bernstein JM Jeske MH Nicholson EA Hahn RA Goldschmidt, et al. 2003 Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy Arch Surg 138 619 23 12799332 10.1001/archsurg.138.6.619 (Pubitemid 36666093)
21. PC Stomper JL Connolly 1992 Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and tumor subtype Am J Roentgenol 159 483 5 1:STN:280:DyaK38zmslKmsQ%3D%3D
22. L Liberman M Drotman EA Morris LR LaTrenta AF Abramson MF Zakowski, et al. 2000 Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy Cancer 89 2538 46 11135213 10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2538::AID-CNCR4>3.0. CO;2-# 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gvValsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32011596)
23. MC Foster MA Helvier NE Gregory M Rebner AV Nees C Paramagul 2004 Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary? Radiology 231 813 9 15105449 10.1148/radiol. 2313030874 (Pubitemid 38668103)