BI-RADS Decoded: Detailed Guidance on Potentially Confusing Issues

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 751-763

  D'Orsi, Carl J ^a   Newell, Mary S ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSENSUS; FOLLOW UP; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL AUDIT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TERMINOLOGY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548616391     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.003     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Orel S.G., Kay N., Reynolds C., et al. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 211 (1999) 845-850
2. Liberman L., Abrams A.F., Squires F.B., et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammography features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 (1998) 35-40
3. Berg W.A., D'Orsi C.J., Jackson V.P., et al. Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendation or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?. Radiology 224 (2002) 871-880
4. Berg W.A., Arnoldus C.L., Teferra E., et al. Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 221 (2001) 495-503
5. Rosen P.P. Rosen's breast pathology. 2nd edition (2001), Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, New York
6. Lehman C., Holt S., Peacock S., et al. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 15-20
7. Sickles E.A. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 179 (1991) 463-468
8. Varas X., Leborgne F., and Leborgne J.H. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 184 (1992) 409-414
9. Vizcaino I., Gadea L., Andreo L., et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219 (2001) 475-483
10. Varas X., Leborgne F., Leborgne J.H., et al. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 691-695
11. Graf O., Helbich T., Fuchsjaeger M., et al. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?. Radiology 233 (2004) 850-856
12. Bassett L.W., Shayestehfar B., and Hirbawi I. Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: usefulness and costs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163 (1994) 1083-1086
13. Roelofs A.A.J., Karssemeijer N., Wedekind M.S., et al. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 242 (2007) 70-77
14. Lazarus E., Mainiero M.B., Schepps B., et al. BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasound and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239 (2006) 385-391
15. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Barclay J., et al. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276 1 (1996) 22-38
16. Kolb T., Lichy J., and Newhouse J. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast ultrasound and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225 (2002) 165-175
17. Berg W.A., Gutierrez L., Ness Aiver M.S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, ultrasound, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233 (2004) 830-849
18. Martin K.E., Helvie M.A., Zhou C., et al. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology 240 (2006) 656-665