One person with two DNA profiles: A(nother) case of mosaicism or chimerism

International Journal of Legal Medicine

Volumn 123, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 427-430

  Castella, Vincent ^a   Del Mar Lesta, Maria ^b   Mangin, Patrice ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY CENTER OF LEGAL MEDICINE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Chimerism; Evidence evaluation; Likelihood ratio approach; Mosaicism; Short tandem repeat (STR)

Indexed keywords

DNA MARKER;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CASE REPORT; CHIMERA; CRIME; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LEGAL EVIDENCE; MALE; MOSAICISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANIMALS; CHIMERISM; DNA; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DOGS; FORENSIC GENETICS; HUMANS; MALE; MOSAICISM; PENIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TANDEM REPEAT SEQUENCES;

EID: 70349662037     PISSN: 09379827     EISSN: 14371596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-009-0331-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A Milde R Kühl-Burmeister S Ritz-Timme H-J Kaatsch 1999 DNA typing in cases of blood chimerism Int J Legal Med 112 333-335 10460430 10.1007/s004140050263 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzovFKhtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29409074)
2. EAM Graham M Tsokos GN Rutty 2007 Can post-mortem blood be used for DNA profiling after peri-mortem blood transfusion? Int J Legal Med 121 18-23 16341868 10.1007/s00414-005-0063-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jktV2htA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46009467)
3. Dauber EM, Dorner G, Mitterbauer M et al (2004) Discrepant results of samples taken from different tissues of single individual. International Congress Series 1261. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 48-49
4. S Pope H Chapman JA Lambert 2006 Effect of bone marrow transplant on DNA profiles: a case example Sci Justice 46 231-237 17500425 10.1016/S1355-0306(06) 71603-3 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlvFyltbc%3D
5. Dauber EM, Müller CJ, Schöniger-Hekele M et al (2006) Artificial blood chimerism and graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation. International Congress Series 1288. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 840-842
6. SD Tran SR Pillemer A Dutra, et al. 2003 Differentiation of human bone marrow-derived cells into buccal epithelial cells in vivo: a molecular analytical study Lancet 361 1084-1088 12672312 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12894-2 (Pubitemid 36369561)
7. N Yu MS Kruskall JJ Yunis, et al. 2002 Disputed maternity leading to identification of tetragametic chimerism N Engl J Med 346 1545-1552 12015394 10.1056/NEJMoa013452 (Pubitemid 34755694)
8. CE Boklage 2006 Embryogenesis of chimeras, twins and anterior midline asymmetries Hum Reprod 21 579-591 16253966 10.1093/humrep/dei370 (Pubitemid 43372959)
9. RJ Rubocki BJ McCue KJ Duffy KL Shepard SJ Shepherd JL Wisecarver 2001 Natural DNA mixtures generated in fraternal twins in utero J Forensic Sci 46 120 125-11210896 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7jsVCiug%3D%3D
10. C Gunzer EM Dauber M Petrasek B Glock DWM Schwartz WR Mayr 2004 Apparent exclusion of maternity in a twin chimera carrying only her twin brother's blood cells Vox Sang 87 130
11. Rodriguez Cardozo MB, Cólica MV, Abovich MA, Szöcs A, Di Lonardo AM (2004) Maternity testing in a chimerical child. International Congress Series 1261. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 502-504
12. V Malan R Gesny N Morichon-Delvallez, et al. 2007 Prenatal diagnosis and normal outcome of a 46, XX/46, XY chimera: a case report Hum Reprod 22 1037-1041 17272360 10.1093/humrep/del480 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlvVOisrs%3D
13. R Wegener V Weirich EM Dauber WR Mayr 2006 Mother-child exclsuion due to peternal uniparental disomy 6 Int J Legal Med 120 282-285 16604363 10.1007/s00414-006-0077-y 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28votlOqug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44244044)
14. Verdiani S, Bonsignore A, Casarino L, Zia SC, Ferrari GM, De Stefano F (2009) An unusual observation of tetragametic chimerism. Forensic considerations. Int J Legal Med, in press
15. B Rolf P Wiegand B Brinkmann 2002 Somatic mutations at STR loci-a reason for three-allele pattern and mosaicism Forensic Sci Int 126 200-202 12062941 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00054-3 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xktlyntb8%3D (Pubitemid 34626592)
16. TM Clayton JL Guest AJ Urquhart PD Gill 2004 A genetic basis for anomalous band patterns encountered during DNA STR profiling J Forensic Sci 49 1207-1214 15568691 10.1520/JFS2003145 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVKisLfK
17. M Poetsch A Petersmann C Woenckhaus C Protzel T Dittberner E Lignitz B Kleist 2004 Evaluation of allelic alterations in short tandem repeats in different kinds of solid tumors-possible pitfalls in forensic casework Forensic Sci Int 145 1-6 15374588 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnslOhs7s%3D
18. CY Pai LL Hsieh CW Tsai FS Chiou CH Yang BD Hsu 2002 Allelic alteration at the STR markers in the buccal tissue cells of oral cancer patients and the oral epithelial cells of healthy betel quid-chewers: an evaluation of forensic applicability Forensic Sci Int 129 158-167 12372686 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00205- 0 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnsF2qsrs%3D
19. Peloso G, Grignani P, Rosso R, Previderè C (2003) Forensic evaluation of tetranucleotide STR instability in lung cancer. International Congress Series 1239. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 719-721
20. Edelmann J, Lessig R, Hering S, Horn L-C (2004) Loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability of forensically used STR markers in human cervical carcinoma. International Congress Series 1261. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 499-501
21. H Vauhkonen M Hedman M Vauhkonen M Kataja P Sipponen A Sajantila 2004 Evaluation of gastrointestinal cancer tissues as a source of genetic information for forensic investigations by using STRs Forensic Sci Int 139 159 167 15040910 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.10.016 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtV2mtb4%3D (Pubitemid 38201116)
22. + tumor cells Cell 75 1227 1236 8261516 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90331-J 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXhtVemsr4%3D (Pubitemid 24006118)
23. V Malan M Vekemans C Turleau 2006 Chimera and other fertilization errors Clin Genet 70 363 373 17026615 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00689.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rpsFCgtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44515635)
24. Aitken CGG, Taroni F (2004) Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. Wiley, Chichester
25. LA Foreman IW Evett 2001 Statistical analyses to support forensic interpretation for a new ten-locus STR profiling system Int J Legal Med 114 147 155 11296886 10.1007/s004140000138 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzot1Smtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32167715)
26. H Adamek M Baur B Brinkmann W Eisenmenger 2002 Richtlinien für die Erstattung von Abstammungsgutachten Dtsch Ärztebl 99 541 543
27. LO Cifuentes EH Martínez MP Acuña HG Jonquera 2006 Probability of exclusion in paternity testing: time to reassess J Forensic Sci 51 349 350 16566769 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00064.x 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXltFKqt7s%3D (Pubitemid 43382077)
28. AP Dawid J Mortera P Vicard 2007 Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems Forensic Sci Int 169 195 205 17055679 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.08.028 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmtVOlsbk%3D (Pubitemid 46829708)