Making benefit transfers work: Deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across europe

Working Paper - Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment

Volumn , Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-47

  Bateman, I J ^a   Brouwer, R ^b   Ferrini, S ^a   Schaafsma, M ^b   Barton, D N ^c   Dubgaard, A ^d   Hasler, B ^d   Hime, S ^a   Liekens, I ^e   Navrud, S ^f   De Nocker, L ^e   Sceponaviciute R ^g   Semeniene, D ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

^f NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^g Center for Environmental Policy   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Benefit transfers; Methodology; Non market valuation; Stated preference; Transfer errors; Water quality

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; QUALITY CONTROL; THEORETICAL STUDY; VALUATION; WATER QUALITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 70349661852     PISSN: 09678875     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D. (2003). 'Coherent arbitrariness': stable demand curves without stable preferences, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 73-105.
2. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E.E., Radner, R. and Schuman H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Fed. Reg. 58 (1993): 4601-4614.
3. Banerjee, S. and Murphy, J.H. (2005). The scope test revisited, Applied Economics Letters 12(10): 613-617.
4. Barton, D.N. (2002). The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 42: 147-164.
5. Bateman, I.J. and Brouwer, R. (2006). Consistency and construction in stated WTP for health risk reductions. A novel scope sensitivity test. Resource and Energy Economics 28: 199-214.
6. Bateman, I.J., Burgess, D., Hutchinson, W.G. and Matthews, D.I. (2008). Contrasting NOAA guidelines with Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): Preference learning versus coherent arbitrariness. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55: 127-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08. 003
7. Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B.H., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D.W., Sugden, R. and Swanson, J. (2002a). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
8. Bateman, I.J., Cole, M., Cooper, P., Georgiou, S., Hadley, D. and Poe, G.L. (2004). On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47: 71-93. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-0696(03) 00057-3. (Pubitemid 38039038)
9. Bateman, I.J., Day, B.H., Dupont, D. and Georgiou, S. (forthcoming). Procedural invariance testing of the one-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice elicitation method. Review of Economics and Statistics, in press.
10. Bateman, I.J., Day, B.H., Georgiou, S. and Lake, I. (2006). The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Economics, 60(2): 450-460, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2006.04.003. (Pubitemid 44601974)
11. Bateman, I.J., Day, B.H., Jones, A. P. and Jude, S. (2009) Reducing gains/loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment (VRCE) valuing land use change, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58: 106-118, doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.05.003
12. Bateman, I.J., Dent, S., Peters, E., Slovic, P. and Starmer, C. (2007). The Affect Heuristic and the Attractiveness of Simple Gambles, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20(4): 365-380. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.558
13. Bateman, I.J. and Jones, A.P. (2003). Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: An illustration using UK woodland recreation values, Land Economics 79(2): 235-258. DOI:10.3368/le.79.2. 235.
14. Bateman, I.J., Jones, A.P., Lovett, A.A., Lake, I. and Day B.H. (2002b) Applying geographical information systems (GIS) to environmental and resource economics, Environmental and Resource Economics, 22(1-2): 219-269. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015575214292 (Pubitemid 34635338)
15. Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Turner, R.K., Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1995). Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies, Ecological Economics 12(2):161-179. DOI: 10.1016/0921-8009(94)00044-V.
16. Bateman, I.J., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration, Journal of Public Economics 89(8): 1561-1580, doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06. 013. (Pubitemid 40870018)
17. Bateman, I.J., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1997a). A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 479-505.
18. Bateman, I.J., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1997b). Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation, Economic Journal 107(441): 322-332.
19. Bergland, O., Magnussen, K. and Navrud, S. (1995). Benefit transfer: testing for accuracy and reliability. Discussion Paper, #D-03/1995, Department of Economics and Social Sciences. Agricultural University of Norway.
20. Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design. Psychological Methods 4(3): 243-249.
21. Brouwer, R. (2000). Environmental Value Transfer: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Ecological Economics 32: 137-152.
22. Brouwer, R. and Bateman, I.J. (2005). Benefits Transfer of Willingness to Pay Estimates and Functions for Health-Risk Reductions: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Health Economics 24: 591-611.
23. Brouwer, R. and Spaninks, F.A. (1999). The validity of environmental benefits transfer: Further empirical testing. Environmental and Resource Economics 14(1): 95-117.
24. Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G. & Rabin, R. (eds.) (2003) Advances in Behavioral Economics.
25. Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E. and Hanemann, W.M. (1998) Sequencing and valuing public goods, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 314-323.
26. Carson, R.T. and Groves, T. (2007). Incentive and informational properties of preference questions, Environmental & Resource Economics 37(1): 181-210.
27. Carson, R., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R., Krosnick, J., Mitchell, R., Presser, S., Rudd, P. and Smith, V.K. with Conaway, M. and Martin, K. (1996) Was the NOAA panel correct about contingent valuation?, Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 96-20, Washington D.C.
28. Carson, R. T. and Mitchell, R. C. (1993). The value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable and swimmable quality water, Water Resources Research, 29(7): 2445-2454.
29. Champ, Patty A., Boyle, Kevin and Brown, Tom C. (eds.) (2003). A Primer on Non-market Valuation, The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Services: Volume 3, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
30. Chattopadhyay S. (2003). A Repeated Sampling Technique in Assessing the Validity of Benefit Transfer in Valuing Non-Market Goods, Land Economics, 79 (4): 576-596.
31. Davies, H. and Neal, C. (2004). GIS based methodologies for assessing nitrate, nitrite and ammonium distributions across a major UK basin, the Humber, Hydrology and Earth System Science 8:823-833.
32. Covey, J., Loomes, G. and Bateman, I.J., (2007) Valuing risk reductions: Testing for range biases in payment card and random card sorting methods, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4): 467-482. DOI: 10.1080/09640560701401986 (Pubitemid 47072982)
33. DeShazo, J.R. (2002). Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43: 360-385.
34. Desvousges, W.H., Naughton, M.C. and Parsons, G.R. (1992). Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resources Research, 28(3): 675-683.
35. Desvousges, W.H., Smith, V.K. and Fisher, A. (1987). Option price estimates for water quality improvements: a contingent valuation study of the Monongahela River, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14: 248-267.
36. Douglas, B.B. and Rangel, A. (2008). Behavioural public economics, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Macmillan.
37. Downing, M. and Ozuna, T. (1996). Testing the reliability of the benefit function transfer approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 316-322.
38. Doyle, J. R., O'Connor, D. J., Reynolds, G. M., & Bottomley, P. A. (1999). The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in-store purchases, Psychology & Marketing 16(3): 225-243.
39. European Parliament (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC (The EU Water Framework Directive), Official Journal (OJ L 327): 22 December 2000.
40. Fagerlin, A., Wang, C. and Ubel, P. A. (2005). Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People's Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics? Medical Decision Making 25:398-405.
41. Haab, T, C., and K.E. McConnell. 2003. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Nonmarket Valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts.
42. Halstead J.M., Lindsay B.E., Brown C.M., 1991. Use of the Tobit model in the contingent valuation: experimental evidence from the Pemigewasset wilderness area. Journal of Environmental Management 33: 79:89.
43. Hime, S., Bateman, I.J., Posen, P. and Hutchins, M. (2009) A transferable water quality ladder for conveying use and ecological information within public surveys, CSERGE Working Paper EDM 09-01, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia.
44. Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 247-257.
45. Hutchins, M. G., Deflandre, A. and Boorman, D. B. (2006). Performance benchmarking linked diffuse pollution and in-stream water quality models. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie Supplement, 161 (Large Rivers Supplement 17): 133-154.
46. Johnston, R.J., Besedin, E.Y., Iovanna, R., Miller, C.J., Wardwell, R.F. and Ranson, M.H. (2005). Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: A meta-analysis, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 221-248
47. Johnston, R.J., Ranson, M.H., Besedin, E.Y. and Helm, E.C. (2006). What determines willingness to pay per fish? A meta-analysis of recreational fishing values, Marine Resource Economics 21: 1-32.
48. Jones, A.P., Bateman, I.J. and Wright, J. (2002). Estimating arrival numbers and values for informal recreational use of British woodlands, report to the Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, published at http://www.forestry.gov.uk.
49. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 58: 697-720.
50. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22(1): 57-70.
51. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, New York.
52. Leon-Gonzalez, R. and Scarpa, R. (2008). Improving multi-site benefit functions via Bayesian model averaging: A new approach to benefit transfer, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56(1): 50-68.
53. Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46-55.
54. Lindhjem, H.L. and Navrud, S. (2008). How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? Ecological Economics 66: 425-435.
55. List, J.A. (2002). Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The "More Is Less" Phenomenon, American Economic Review 92(5): 1636-1643.
56. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.
57. Moeltner, K., Boyle, K.J. and Paterson, R.W. (2007). Meta-analysis and benefit transfer for resource valuation-Addressing classical challenges with Bayesian modeling, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 250-269
58. Mullainathan, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2001). Behavioral Economics, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 1094-1100. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02247- 6.
59. Muthke, T. and Holm-Mueller, K. (2004). National and international benefit transfer testing with a rigorous test procedure. Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 323-336.
60. Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (2007a). Review of methods for value transfer. In: Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (eds.), Environmental value transfer: Issues and methods. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
61. Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (eds.) (2007b). Environmental value transfer: Issues and methods. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
62. Pearce, D.W., Whittington, D. and Georgiou, S. (1994). Project and policy appraisal: Integrating economics and environment. OECD, Paris.
63. Peters, E., Slovic, P. and Hibbard, J. (2005). Bringing Meaning to Numbers: Evaluability and Affect in Choice, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
64. Powe, N.A. and Bateman, I.J. (2004) Investigating insensitivity to scope: A split-sample test of perceived scheme realism, Land Economics, 80(2): 258-271.
65. Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 11-46. doi:10.2307/2564950.
66. Ready, R., Navrud, S., Day, B., Dubourg, R., Machado, F., Mourato, S., Spaninks, F. and Vázquez Rodriquez, M.X. (2004). Benefit transfer in Europe: How reliable are transfers between countries? Environmental and Resource Economics, 29: 67-82.
67. Rowe, R.D., Schulze, W.D. and Breffle, W. (1996) A test for payment card biases, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31: 178-185.
68. Santos, J.M.L. (2007). Transferring landscape values: how and how accurately? in Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (Eds.) Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods, The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Services: Volume 9, Springer, Dordrecht.
69. Scarpa, R., Hutchinson, W.G., Chilton, S.M. and Buongiorno, J. (2007) Benefit value transfers conditional on site attributes: Some evidence of reliability from forest recreation in Ireland, in Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (Eds.) Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods, The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Services: Volume 9, Springer, Dordrecht.
70. Schkade, D. A. and Payne, J. W. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 88-109.
71. Simon, H. A. (1987). Behavioural economics, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 1, pp. 221-224
72. Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist 50: 364-371.
73. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science 185: 1124-1131.
74. UKTAG (2008). UK Environmental Standards and Conditions (Phase 1): Final Report - April 2008, The UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive (UKTAG), http://www.wfduk.org/
75. Van den Berg TP, Poe GL, and Powell JR. 2001. Assessing the accuracy of benefits transfers: evidence from a multi-site contingent valuation study of ground water quality. In: Bergstrom J, Boyle K, and Poe G (Eds). The Economic Value of Water Quality. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
76. WATECO (2004) Economics and the Environment - The Implementation Challenge of the Water Framework Directive. Luxembourg: European Commission.
77. World Bank (2008). Global purchasing power parities and real expenditures. World Bank, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
78. Zikmund-Fisher, B J., Fagerlin, A. and Ubel, P. A. (2005). What's Time Got to Do with It? Inattention to Duration in Interpretation of Survival Graphs, Risk Analysis 25(3): 589-595.
79. Zandersen M., Termansen M., Jensen F.S. (2007) Testing Benefits Transfer of Forest Recreation Values over a Twenty-Year Time Horizon, Land Economics, 83 (3): 412-440.