Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: Mobile-core versus fixed-core

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 17, 2007, Pages 1840-1851

  Moumene, Missoum ^a   Geisler, Fred H ^b  

^a Synthes Technical Center   (United States)

^b Illinois Neuro Spine Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Facet joints; Finite element modeling; Lumbar arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; LUMBAR SPINE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RANGE OF MOTION;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CADAVER; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 34548426124     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811ec29c     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wetzel FT, LaRocca H. The failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 1991;16:839-45.
2. Highhouse ME, Schultz RT, Dall BE. Lateral intertransverse process single-level fusion for salvage of the unstable failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:59-63
3. Togawa D, Bauer TW, Lieberman IH, et al. Lumbar intervertebral body fusion cages: histological evaluation of clinically failed cages retrieved from humans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:70-9.
4. Simmons JW. Treatment of failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) of the spine with pulsing electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop 1985:127-32.
5. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2003;28(suppl):110 -7.
6. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988;13:375-7.
7. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1497-503.
8. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:338-45.
9. Throckmorton TW, Hilibrand AS, Mencio GA, et al. The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28:2546-50.
10. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop 1999;28:336-40.
11. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple GA, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemptions Study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: II. Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1576-83.
12. Buttner-Janz K, Hochschuler S, McAfee PC. The Artificial Disc. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.
13. Buttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H. An alternative treatment strategy in lumbar intervertebral disk damage using an SB Charite modular type intervertebral disk endoprosthesis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1987;125:1-6.
14. Yoshioka T, Tsuji H, Hirano N, et al. Motion characteristic of the normal lumbar spine in young adults: instantaneous axis of rotation and vertebral center motion analyses. J Spinal Disord 1990;3:103-13.
15. Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints. Spine 1988;13:1033-41.
16. Gertzbein SD, Holtby R, Tile M, et al. Determination of a locus of instantaneous centers of rotation of the lumbar disc by moire fringes: a new technique. Spine 1984;9:409-13.
17. Borenstein DG. Chronic low back pain. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1996;22:439-56.
18. Saal JS. General principles of diagnostic testing as related to painful lumbar spine disorders: a critical appraisal of current diagnostic techniques. Spine 2002;27:2538-46.
19. Grobler LJ, Robertson PA, Novotny JE, et al. Etiology of spondylolisthesis: assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology. Spine 1993;18:80-91.
20. Panjabi MM, Oxland T, Takata K, et al. Articular facets of the human spine: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1993;18:1298-310.
21. Cao KD, Grimm MJ, Yang KH. Load sharing within a human lumbar vertebral body using the finite element method. Spine 2001;26:E253-60.
22. Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 1995;20:887-900.
23. Brickley-Parsons D, Glimcher MJ. Is the chemistry of collagen in intervertebral discs an expression of Wolff's Law? A study of the human lumbar spine. Spine 1984;9:148-63.
24. Stevens RL, Ryvar R, Robertson WR, et al. Biological changes in the annulus fibrosus in patients with low-back pain. Spine 1982;7:223-33.
25. Natarajan RN, Andersson GB. The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. Spine 1999;24:1873-81.
26. Panjabi MM, Greenstein G, Duranceau J, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative morphology of lumbar spinal ligaments. J Spinal Disord 1991;4:54-62.
27. Chazal J, Tanguy A, Bourges M, et al. Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and a histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. J Biomech 1985;18:167-76.
28. Dumas GA, Beaudoin L, Drouin G. In situ mechanical behavior of posterior spinal ligaments in the lumbar region: an in vitro study. J Biomech 1987;20:301-10.
29. Goel VK, Kim YE, Lim TH, et al. An analytical investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation. Spine 1988;13:1003-11.
30. Geisler FH. Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the CHARITE™ artificial disc. Neurosurgery 2005;56:ONS46-57.
31. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1990.
32. Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, et al. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:413-24.
33. Panjabi MM, Krag MH, Chung TQ. Effects of disc injury on mechanical behavior of the human spine. Spine 1984;9:707-13.
34. Berkson M, Schultz AB. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments: II. Response in compression and shear; influence of gross morphology. J Biomech Eng 1979;101:53-7.
35. Ranu HS. Measurement of pressures in the nucleus and within the annulus of the human spinal disc: due to extreme loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1990;204:141-6.
36. Schultz A, Andersson G, Ortengren R, et al. Loads on the lumbar spine: validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:713-20.
37. Nachemson AL, Schultz AB, Berkson MH. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments: influence of age, sex, disc level, and degeneration. Spine 1979;4:1-8.
38. Burstein AH, Reilly DT, Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:82-6.
39. Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC. Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. Bone 1987;8:79-85.
40. Ueno K, Liu YK. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. J Biomech Eng 1987;109:200-9.
41. Shirazi-Adl SA, Shrivastava SC, Ahmed AM. Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression: a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine 1984;9:120-34.