Effects of electronic mail policies on invasiveness and fairness

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 502-525

  Paschal, Jennifer L ^a   Stone, Dianna L ^b   Stone Romero, Eugene F ^b  

^a BearingPoint   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic mail; Employee attitudes; Privacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349618918     PISSN: 02683946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02683940910974107     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aguinis, H.A. and Stone-Romero, E.F. (1997), Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 192-206.
2. Ajzen, I. (1988), Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior, Dorsey Press, Chicago, IL.
3. Ajzen, I. (1991), The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
4. Alge, B.J. (2001), Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, pp. 797-804.
5. Altman, I. (1976), Privacy: a conceptual analysis, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 8, pp. 7-29.
6. Ambrose, M.L., Alder, G.S. and Noel, T.W. (1998), Electronic performance monitoring: a consideration of rights, Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial Ethics: Moral Management of People and Processes, pp. 61-80, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
7. American Management Association International (2001), American Management Association International Workplace monitoring and surveillance: Summary of Key Findings, AMAI, New York, NY.
8. Aronson, E., Ellsworth, P.C., Carlsmith, J.M. and Gonzales, M.H. (1990), Methods of Research in Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2nd ed.
9. Bies, R.J. (1987), The predicament of injustice: the management of moral outrage, Cummings, L.L., Staw, B.M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, pp. 289-319, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
10. Bies, R.J. and Moag, J.S. (1986), Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness, Lewicki, R.J., Sheppard, B.H., Bazerman, M.H. (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations, pp. 43-55, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
11. Bies, R.J. and Shapiro, D.L. (1987), Interactional fairness judgments: the influence of causal accounts, Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, pp. 160-99.
12. Bies, R.J. and Shapiro, D.L. (1988), Voice and justification: their influence on procedural fairness judgments, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 676-85.
13. Botan, C. (1996), Communication work and electronic surveillance: a model for predicting panoptic effects, Communication Monographs, Vol. 63, pp. 293-313.
14. Derlega, V.J. and Chaiken, A.L. (1977), Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 33, pp. 102-15.
15. Eddy, E., Stone, D. and Stone-Romero, E. (1999), The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: an integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 335-58.
16. Electronic Messaging Association, Bruce, J.T. (2000), available at: www.ema.org\restricted\documents\privacy_toolkit.pdf (accessed October 21, 2001), Privacy Policy Toolkit: Access to, Use, and Disclosure of Electronic Messaging on Company Computer Systems in the 21st Century: A Guide to Formulating your Company's Policy.
17. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
18. Folger, R. and Greenberg, J. (1985), Procedural justice: an interpretive analysis of personnel systems, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, pp. 141-83.
19. French, J.R.P. and Raven, B.H. (1959), The bases of social power, Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies of Social Power, pp. 150-67, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
20. Gilliland, S.W. (1993), The perceived fairness of selection systems: an organizational justice perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 694-734.
21. Greenberg, J. (1987), A taxonomy of organizational justice theories, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, pp. 9-22.
22. Greenberg, J. (1990), Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 399-432.
23. Greenberg, J. (1993), The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice, Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, pp. 79-103, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
24. Greenberg, J. (1994), Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, pp. 288-93.
25. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R. and Wan, C.K. (1990), Interaction effects in multiple regression, Lewis-Beck, M.S. (Ed.), Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Vol. 72, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
26. Justa, F.C. and Golan, M.B. (1977), Office design: is privacy still a problem?, Journal of Architectural Research, Vol. 6, pp. 5-12.
27. Kelvin, P. (1973), A social-psychological examination of privacy, British Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, Vol. 12, pp. 248-61.
28. Leventhal, G.S. (1980), What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships, Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., Willis, R. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, pp. 27-55, Plenum Press, New York, NY.
29. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York, NY.
30. Lukaszewski, K.M., Stone, D.L. and Stone-Romero, E.F. (2008), The effects of the ability to choose the type of human resources system on perceptions of invasion of privacy and system satisfaction, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 23, pp. 73-86.
31. Marshall, N.J. (1970), Orientations toward privacy: environmental and personality components, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
32. Matwyshyn, A.M. (2005), Material vulnerabilities: data privacy, corporate information security, and securities regulation, Berkeley Business Law Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 129-203.
33. Pape, W.R. (1998), Virtual manager: relative merits, Inc. Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 23-4.
34. Schein, E.H. (1992), Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2nd ed.
35. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (2002), Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
36. Society for Human Resource Management (1997), E-mail and World Wide Web survey: A Survey Report from the SHRM Issues Management Program, SHRM, Alexandria, VA.
37. Stone, D.L. (1986), Relationship between introversion/extraversion, values regarding control over information, and perceptions of invasion of privacy, Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 62, pp. 371-6.
38. Stone, D.L. and Kotch, D.A. (1989), Individuals' attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, pp. 518-21.
39. Stone, D.L. and Stone-Romero, E.F. (1998), A multiple stakeholder model of privacy in organizations, Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial Ethics: Morally Managing People and Processes, pp. 35-59, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
40. Stone, D.L., Lukaszewski, K.M. and Stone-Romero, E.F. (2007), A model of the transfer of knowledge in human resource management, Scarpello, V.G. (Ed.), The Handbook of Human Resource Management Education, Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
41. Stone, D.L., Stone-Romero, E.F. and Lukaszewski, K. (2003), The functional and dysfunctional consequences of human resource information technology for organizations and their employees, Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, Vol. 3, pp. 37-68.
42. Stone, D.L., Stone-Romero, E.F. and Lukaszewski, K. (2006), Factors affecting the acceptance and effectivness of electronic human resource systems, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 229-44.
43. Stone, E.F. (1990), Moderator variables in research, Ferris, G.R., Rowland, K.M. (Eds.), Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Human Resources Research, pp. 161-99, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
44. Stone, E.F. and Stone, D.L. (1990), Privacy in organizations: theoretical issues, research findings, and protection mechanisms, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 8, pp. 349-411.
45. Stone, E.F., Gueutal, H.G., Gardner, D.G. and McClure, S. (1983), A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 68, pp. 459-68.
46. Stone-Romero, E.F. (2005), The effects of EHR system characteristics and culture on system acceptance and effectiveness, Gueutal, H.G., Stone, D.L. (Eds.), The Brave New World of eHR: Human Resource Management in the Digital Age, pp. 226-54, Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA.
47. Stone-Romero, E.F. and Liakhovitski, D. (2002), Strategies for detecting moderator variables: a review of theory and research, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 21, pp. 333-72.
48. Stone-Romero, E.F. and Rosopa, P. (2004), Inference problems with hierarchical multiple regression-based tests of mediating effects, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 23, pp. 249-90.
49. Stone-Romero, E.F., Stone, D.L. and Salas, E. (2003), The influence of culture on role conceptions and role behavior in organizations, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 52, pp. 328-62.
50. Stone-Romero, E.F. and Rosopa, P. (2008), The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 11, pp. 326-52.
51. Stone-Romero, E.F. and Stone, D.L. (2005), How do organizational justice concepts relate to discrimination and prejudice?, Greenberg, J., Colquitt, J.A. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Justice, pp. 439-67, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
52. Stone-Romero, E.F. and Stone, D.L. (2007), Current perspectives on privacy in organizations, Gilliland, S.W., Steiner, D., Skarlicki, D.P. (Eds.), Research in Social Issues in Management, pp. 325-62, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT.
53. Swanson, D.J. (1993), Toward a policy for managing the use of computer mediated communication in the workplace, paper presented at the Fourth Annual Sooner Communications Conference, Norman, OK, April.
54. Tyler, T.R. (1989), The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group-value model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, pp. 830-8.
55. UCLA Center for Communication Policy (2001), available at: www.ccp.ucla.edu/pdf/UCLA-Internet-Report-2001.pdf (accessed January 26, 2002), The UCLA Internet Report 2001: Surveying the Digital Future, Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
56. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1987), OTA Publication No. OTA-CIT-333, The Electronic Supervisor: New Technology, New Tensions, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
57. US General Accounting Office (2002), Publication No. GAO-02-717, from the General Accounting Office, available at: www.gao.gov (accessed October 13, 2002), Employee Privacy: Computer-use Monitoring Practices and Policies of Selected Companies.
58. Westin, A. (1967), Privacy and Freedom, Atheneum, New York, NY.
59. Winer, B.J., Brown, D.R. and Michels, K.M. (1991), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 3rd ed.
60. Yukl, G. (1994), Leadership in organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 3rd ed.
61. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 1173-82.
62. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2nd ed.
63. Stone-Romero, E.F., Weaver, A.E. and Glenar, J.L. (1995), Trends in research design and data analytic strategies in organizational research, Journal of Management, Vol. 21, pp. 141-57.