IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 273-283

  Checa, Miguel A ^a   Alonso Coello, Pablo ^b,c   Solà, Ivan ^b   Robles, Ana ^a   Carreras, Ramón ^a   Balasch, Juan ^d  

^a HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c CIBER EPIDEMIOLOGÍA Y SALUD PÚBLICA CIBERESP   (Spain)

^d INSTITUT D INVESTIGACIONS BIOMÈDIQUES AUGUST PI I SUNYER IDIBAPS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Advanced maternal age; Aneuploidy; IVF ICSI; Meta analysis; Preimplantation genetic screening; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Repeated IVF failure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; MATERNAL AGE; META ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY DISORDER; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; HUMANS; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349587908     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9328-4     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. S Soini D Ibarreta V Anastasiadou S Aymé S Braga M Cornel DA Coviello G Evers-Kiebooms J Geraedts L Gianaroli J Harper G Kosztolanyi K Lundin E Rodrigues-Cerezo K Sermon J Sequeiros L Tranebjaerg H Kääriä inen 2006 The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues Eur J Hum Genet 14 588 645 16636693 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201598
2. J Balasch 2000 Investigation of the infertile couple in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a time for reappraisal Hum Reprod 15 2251 7 11056115 10.1093/humrep/15.11.2251 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmtVWqtA%3D%3D
3. EHY Ng PC Ho 2007 Ageing and ART: a waste of time and money? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21 5 20 17049459 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.09.004 (Pubitemid 46321280)
4. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group 2005 Fertility and ageing Hum Reprod Update 11 261 76 10.1093/humupd/dmi006 (Pubitemid 40668111)
5. The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1497-1504.
6. J Grace T El Toukhy P Braude 2004 Pre-implantation genetic testing BJOG 111 1165 73 15521860 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00440.x (Pubitemid 39472161)
7. JE Sampson N Ouhibi H Lawce PE Patton DE Battaglia KA Burry SB Olson 2004 The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in balanced translocation carriers Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 1707 13 15284776 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.063 (Pubitemid 39006208)
8. LK Shahine MI Cedars 2006 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis does not increase pregnancy rates in patients at risk for aneuploidy Fertil Steril 85 51 6 16412730 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.06.045 (Pubitemid 43063422)
9. T El-Toukhy Y Khalaf P Braude 2006 IVF results: optimize not maximize Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 322 31 16458624 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.018 (Pubitemid 43183679)
10. JE Mersereau E Pergament X Zhang MP Milad 2008 Preimplantation genetic screening to improve in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates: a prospective randomized controlled trial Fertil Steril 90 1287 9 18061593 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.010
11. C Staessen W Verpoest P Donoso P Haentjens J Van der Els I Liebaers P Devroey 2008 Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer Hum Reprod 23 2818 25 18930977 10.1093/humrep/den367 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjksF2rtA%3D%3D
12. Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S. Detección genética de preimplantación del número anormal de cromosomas (aneuploides) en la fertilización in vitro o en la inyección intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (Revisión Cochrane traducida). En: La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus, 2008 Número 4. Oxford: Update Software Ltd. Disponible en: http://www.update-software.com. Traducida de The Cochrane Library, 2008 Issue 3. Chichester: Wiley.
13. J Stevens P Wale ES Surrey WB Schoolcraft 2004 Is aneuploidy screening for patients aged 35 or over beneficial? A prospective randomized trial. [Abstract] Fertil Steril 82 Suppl 2 249 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.664
14. C Staessen P Platteau E Van Assche A Michiels H Tournaye M Camus P Devroey I Liebaers A Van Steirteghem 2004 Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial Hum Reprod 19 2849 58 15471934 10.1093/humrep/deh536 (Pubitemid 40028958)
15. JM Glanville C Lefebvre JN Miles J Camosso-Stefinovic 2006 How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on J Med Libr Assoc 94 130 6 16636704
16. G Lowe S Twaddle 2005 The Scottish intercollegiate guidelines network (SIGN): an update Scott Med J 50 51 2 15977513 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzislalsQ%3D%3D
17. JL Fleiss 1993 The statistical basis of meta-analysis Stat Methods Med Res 2 121 45 8261254 10.1177/096228029300200202 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FosVCktQ%3D%3D
18. A Donner N Klar 1996 The statistical analysis of kappa statistics in multiple samples J Clin Epidemiol 49 1053 8 8780616 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00057-1 1:STN:280:DyaK28znsVehtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26319041)
19. JP Higgins SG Thompson JJ Deeks DG Altman 2003 Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 557 60 12958120 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
20. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology GD Adamson J de Mouzon P Lancaster KG Nygren E Sullivan, et al. 2006 World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000 Fertil Steril 85 1586 622 16759920 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.011 (Pubitemid 43833292)
21. GH Guyatt AD Oxman GE Vist R Kunz Y Falck-Ytter P Alonso-Coello HJ Schünemann 2008 GRADE working group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 336 7650 924 6 18436948 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
22. JM Pogue S Yusuf 1997 Cumulating evidence from randomized trials: utilizing sequential monitoring boundaries for cumulative meta-analysis Control Clin Trials 18 580 93 9408720 10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00051-2 1:STN:280: DyaK1c%2FntlSiug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27520846)
23. F Zegers-Hochschild KG Nygren GD Adamson J de Mouzon P Lancaster R Mansour 2006 Sullivan E on behalf of the international committee monitoring assisted reproductive technologies Hum Reprod 21 1968 70 16864610 10.1093/humrep/del171 (Pubitemid 44288067)
24. Domingo J (principal investigator). ClinicalTrials gov. Identifier NCT00547781. URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00547781?rcv-s= 10%2F22%2F2007&rank=1.
25. L Werlin I Rodi A DeCherney E Marello D Hill S Munné 2003 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology Fertil Steril 80 467 8 12909520 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00605-8 (Pubitemid 36959815)
26. S Mastenbroek M Twisk J van Echten-Arends B Sikkema-Raddatz JC Korevaar HR Verhoeve NE Vogel EG Arts JW de Vries PM Bossuyt CH Buys MJ Heineman S Repping F van der Veen 2007 In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening N Engl J Med 357 9 17 17611204 10.1056/NEJMoa067744 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnsVygu70%3D (Pubitemid 47026730)
27. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J, Rawlins M, Munne S. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil Steril. 2008; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.029.
28. RPS Jansen MC Bowman KA de Booer DA Leigh DB Lieberman SJ McArthur 2008 What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy Hum Reprod 23 1476 8 18539624 10.1093/humrep/den129 (Pubitemid 351809712)
29. Meyer LR, Klipstein S, Hazlett WD, Nasta T, Mangan P, Karande VC. A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the "good prognosis" patient. Fertil Steril. 2008; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.162
30. T Hardarson C Hanson K Lundin T Hillensjö L Nilsson J Stevic E Reismer K Borg M Wikland C Bergh 2008 Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial Hum Reprod 23 2806 12 18583331 10.1093/humrep/den217 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjksFagtw%3D%3D
31. PJ Devereaux PT Choi S El-Dika M Bhandari VM Montori HJ Schünemann AX Garg JW Busse D Heels-Ansdell WA Ghali BJ Manns GH Guyatt 2004 An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods J Clin Epidemiol 57 1232 6 15617948 10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2004.03.017 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnkt1ahsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40023142)
32. N Geicher A Weghofer D Barad 2008 Preimplantation genetic screening: "established" and ready for prime time? Fertil Steril 89 780 8 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.072
33. L Gianaroli MC Magli S Munné A Fiorentino N Montanaro AP Ferraretti 2007 Will preimplantation genetic diagnosis assist patients with a poor prognosis to achieve pregnancy? Hum Reprod 12 1762 7 10.1093/humrep/12.8. 1762
34. E Iwarsson M Lundqvist J Inzunza L Ahrlund-Richter P Sjöblom O Lundkvist N Simberg M Nordenskjöld E Blennow 1999 A high degree of aneuploidy in frozen-thawed human preimplantation embryos Hum Genet 104 376 82 10394928 10.1007/s004390050971 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzitVymsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29286793)
35. JD Delhanty JC Harper A Ao AH Handyside RM Winston 1997 Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients Hum Genet 99 755 60 9187668 10.1007/s004390050443 1:STN:280:DyaK2szjtFegtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27243753)
36. AS Lim VH Goh CL Su SL Yu 2000 Microscopic assessment of pronuclear embryos is not definitive Hum Genet 107 62 8 10982037 10.1007/s004390050012 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjs1OisQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30598949)
37. S Munné M Sandalinas T Escudero E Velilla R Walmsley S Sadowy J Cohen D Sable 2003 Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy Reprod Biomed Online 7 91 7 12930584
38. S Reis Soares C Rubio L Rodrigo C Simón J Remohí A Pellicer 2003 High frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos obtained from oocyte donation cycles Fertil Steril 80 656 67 12969720 10.1016/S0015-0282(03) 00787-8 (Pubitemid 37102888)
39. C Rubio C Simón F Vidal L Rodrigo T Pehlivan J Remohí A Pellicer 2003 Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples Hum Reprod 18 182 8 12525464 10.1093/humrep/deg015 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fksl2gsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36138874)
40. M Bahçe J Cohen S Munné 1999 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes? J Assist Reprod Genet 16 176 81 10224560 10.1023/A:1020308722247 (Pubitemid 29200656)
41. D Wells JD Delhanty 2000 Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization Mol Hum Reprod 6 1055 62 11044470 10.1093/molehr/6.11.1055 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXosVeju7o%3D
42. D Wells B Levy 2003 Cytogenetics in reproductive medicine: the contribution of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) Bioessays 25 289 300 12596234 10.1002/bies.10232 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXisVWntrg%3D (Pubitemid 36314117)
43. L Wilton L Voullaire P Sargeant R Williamson J McBain 2003 Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure Fertil Steril 80 860 8 14556801 10.1016/S0015-0282(03) 01162-2 (Pubitemid 37230016)
44. MC Magli GM Jones L Gras L Gianaroli I Korman AO Trounson 2000 Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro Hum Reprod 15 1781 6 10920103 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1781 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitFSntA%3D%3D
45. M Li CM DeUgarte M Surrey H Danzer A DeCherney DL Hill 2005 Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3 Fertil Steril 84 1395 400 16275234 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2005.04.068 (Pubitemid 41571886)
46. S Munné E Velilla P Colls M Garcia Bermudez MC Vemuri N Steuerwald J Garrisi J Cohen 2005 Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos in culture and implications for stem cell production Fertil Steril 84 1328 34 16275225 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.06.025 (Pubitemid 41571877)
47. P Donoso C Staessen BC Fauser P Devroey 2007 Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF Hum Reprod Update 13 15 25 16960015 10.1093/humupd/dml043 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jitVGjtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44932821)
48. CB Coulam RS Jeyendran M Fiddler E Pergament 2007 Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective J Assist Reprod Genet 24 37 41 17216564 10.1007/s10815-006-9073-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FnsFKqug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46213650)
49. A Templeton JK Morris 1998 Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization N Engl J Med 27 573 7 10.1056/NEJM199808273390901 (Pubitemid 28385653)
50. LA Schieve HB Peterson SF Meikle G Jeng I Danel NM Burnett LS Wilcox 1999 Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization JAMA 282 1832 8 10573274 10.1001/jama.282.19.1832 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fjsl2ntw%3D%3D
51. P Braude F Flinter 2007 Use and misuse of preimplantation genetic testing BMJ 335 752 4 17823145 10.1136/bmj.39314.439491.AD
52. BJ Van Voorhis 2007 Clinical practice. In vitro fertilization N Engl J Med 356 379 86 17251534 10.1056/NEJMcp065743 (Pubitemid 46148780)
53. S Mastenbroek P Scriven M Twisk S Viville F Van der Veen S Repping 2008 Ahet next for preimplantation genetic screening? More randomized controlled trials needed? Hum Reprod 23 2626 8 18948310 10.1093/humrep/den376 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjks1KhsA%3D%3D
54. MA Fritz 2008 Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now? Hum Reprod 23 2617 21 19015133 10.1093/humrep/den400