Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of pomelo maturity using multivariate combination of chemical and physical properties

Journal of Texture Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 584-605

  Terdwongworakul, Anupun ^a   Puangsombat, Arthit ^a   Pathaveerat, Siwalak ^a  

^a KASETSART UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Acoustic response; Impact response; Maturity; Multivariate analysis; Pomelo

Indexed keywords

CITRUS MAXIMA;

EID: 70349553965     PISSN: 00224901     EISSN: 17454603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2009.00199.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ABBOTT, J.A., BACHMAN, G.S., CHILDERS, N.F., FITZGERALD, J.V. MATUSIK, F.J. 1968. Sonic techniques for measuring texture of fruits and vegetables. Food Technol. 22, 101 112.
2. BALDWIN, E.A. 1996. Citrus fruit. In The Biochemistry of Fruit Ripening (G. Seymour, J. Taylor G.A. Tucker, eds.) pp. 122 123, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
3. BOONMUNG, S., CHOMTEE, B. KANLAYASIRI, K. 2006. Evaluation of agricultural neural networks for pineapple grading. J. Texture Studies 37, 568 579.
4. CAMPS, C., GUILLERMIN, P., MAUGET, J.C. BERTRAND, D. 2005. Data analysis of penetrometric force/displacement curves for the characterization of whole apple fruits. J. Texture Studies 36 (4 387 401.
5. CHEN, H. DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. 1993. Modal analysis of the dynamic behavior of pineapples and its relation to fruit firmness. Trans. ASAE 36, 1439 1444.
6. CHEN, P., CHEN, S. TANG, S. 1985. Instrument for testing the response of fruits to impact. ASAE Paper 85-3537.
7. CHEN, P.M., RUIZ-ALTISENT, M. BARREIRO, P. 1996. Effects of impaction mass on firmness sensing of fruits. Trans ASAE 39 (3 1019 1023.
8. COOKE, J.R. 1972. An interpretation of the resonant behavior of intact fruits and vegetables. Trans ASAE 15 (6 1075 1080.
9. DE KETELAERE, B., RUIZ-ALTISENT, M., CORREA, E.C., DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. BARREIRO, P. 2001. Reliability of vibration measurements and impact response characteristics for the quality assessment of tomatoes. The 6th international symposium on fruit, nut and vegetable production engineering, September 11-14, Potsdam, Germany.
10. DIEZMA-IGLESIAS, B., VALERO, C., GARCIA-RAMOS, F.J. RUIZ-ALTISENT, M. 2006. Monitoring of firmness evolution of peaches during storage by combining acoustic and impact methods. J. Food Eng. 77 (4 926 935.
11. FINNEY, E.E. 1970. Mechanical resonance within red delicious apples and its relation to fruit texture. Trans. ASAE 13 (2 177 180.
12. GOMEZ, A.H., WANG, J. PEREIRA, A.G. 2005. Impulse response of pear fruit and its relation to Magness-Taylor firmness during storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 35 (2 209 215.
13. GOMEZ, A.H., WANG, J. PEREIRA, A.G. 2006. Firmness of mandarin at different picking dates. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 12 (4 273 279.
14. JARIMOPAS, B. KITTHAWEE, U. 2007. Firmness properties of mangoes. Int. J. Food Prop. 10 (4 899 909.
15. KEUTGEN, A. PAWELZIK, E. 2007. Modifications of taste-relevant compounds in strawberry fruit under NaCl salinity. Food Chem. 105 (4 1487 1494. (Pubitemid 47095169)
16. KLEINBAUM, D.G., KUPPER, L.L., MULLER, K.E. NIZAM A. 1998. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, 3rd Ed., p. 241, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.
17. LU, R. ABBOTT, J.A. 1997. Finite element modeling of transient modeling of transient responses of apples to impulse excitation. Trans. ASAE 40 (5 1395 1406.
18. MOHSENIN, N.N. 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials, p. 891, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, NY.
19. NEAMSORN, N. TERDWONGWORAKUL, A. 2004. Maturity index of "Montong" durian based on stem strength and acoustic frequency response. Proceedings of Japan-Thailand joint symposium on Nondestructive evaluation technology NIR, Bangkok, Thailand, May, 18-21.
20. NOURAIN, J., YING, Y.B., WAND, J.P., RAO, X.Q. YU, C.G. 2005. Firmness evaluation of melon using its vibration characteristic and finite element analysis. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 6B (6 483 490.
21. PATHAVEERAT, S., TERDWONGWORAKUL, A. PHAUNGSOMBUT, A. 2008. Multivariate data analysis for classification of pineapple maturity. J. Food Eng. 89 (2 112 118.
22. SHMULEVICH, I. 1998. A review firmness quality measurements in fruits and vegetables. SENSORAL 98. International workshop on sensing quality of agricultural products, Montpellier, France.
23. SNEDECOR, G.W. COCHRAN, W.G. 1989. Statistical Methods, 8th Ed., p. 543, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
24. WANG, J., TENG, B. YU, Y. 2004. Pear dynamic characteristics and firmness detection. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 218 (3 289 294. (Pubitemid 40890174)
25. WANG, J., GOMEZ, A.H. PEREIRA, A.G. 2006a. Acoustic impulse response for measuring the firmness of mandarin during storage. J. Food Qual. 29 (4 392 404.
26. WANG, J., TENG, B. YU, Y. 2006b. The firmness detection by excitation dynamic characteristics for peach. Food Control 17 (5 353 358. (Pubitemid 41644589)
27. WANG, J., YING, T.J. CHENG, K.C. 2007. Evaluation of pear firmness by dynamic characterictics of drop impact. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87 (8 1449 1454.
28. WATTANAVICHEAN, K. AROONYADET, N. 2003. Assessment of fruit maturity in "Kao Nampheung" pummelo using image processing of oil glands. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 36 (2 120 140.
29. WONGSRISAKULKAEW, Y. 2002. Fruit growth and development of "Kao Nampheung" pummelo and some fruit characteristics of other cultivars. MSc Thesis, p.54, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand (in Thai with English abstract).
30. YAMAMOTO, H., IWAMOTA, M. HAGINUMA, S. 1980. Acoustic impulse response method for measuring natural frequency of intact fruits and preliminary applications to internal quality evaluations of apples and watermelons. J. Texture Studies 11, 117 136.