Cumulative demand of the earthquake ground motions in the near source

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1853-1865

  Manfredi, Gaetano ^a   Polese, Maria ^a   Cosenza, Edoardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Attenuation law; Cumulative damage; Input energy; Near fault; Plastic cycles

Indexed keywords

PLASTICITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

PLASTIC CYCLES;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

EARTHQUAKE; FAULT; GROUND MOTION; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 0141871981     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.305     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Somerville PG, Smith NF. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters 1997;68(1):199-222.
2. Cosenza E, Manfredi G. Low cycle fatigue: Characterization of the plastic cycles due to earthquake ground motion. Testing of Metal in Structures, Mazzolani FM (ed.), 1990, E&FN Spon.
3. Cosenza E, Manfredi G. Damage indices and damage measures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 2000; 2(1):50-59.
4. Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Ramasco R. The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: a comparison between different methods. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22(10):855-868.
5. Manfredi G. Evaluation of seismic energy demand, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30(4):495-500.
6. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1975; 65:581-626.
7. Arias A. A measure of earthquake intensity, Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants. MIT Press, 1970; pp. 438-468.
8. Fajfar P, Vidic T, Fishinger M. A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1990; 9(5):236-242.
9. Cosenza E, Manfredi G. The improvement of the seismic-resistant design for existing and new structures using damage concept. Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Fajfar P, Krawinkler H (eds), Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca delle Stato 1997; pp. 67-176.
10. Arrya R, Saragoni GR. Earthquake Accelerograms Destructiveness Potential Factor. Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1984; San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
11. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake Spectra and Desiqn. 1982; EERI Monograph Series.
12. Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA. Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1978; 6(1):31-42.
13. Decanini L, Mollaioli F, Orsini G. II Terremoto di Kobe del 17 gennaio 1995. - Capitolo 5-Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato 1995.
14. Baez JI, Miranda E. Amplification factors to estimate inelastic displacement demands for the design of structures in the near field. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2000, New Zealand.
15. Joyner WB, Boore DM. Peak acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1981; 71: 2011-2038.
16. Chou CC, Uang CM. An Evaluation of Seismic Energy Demand: An Attenuation Approach. Peer Report 2000/04.