Direct displacement-based design: Use of inelastic vs. Elastic design spectra

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 47-64

  Chopra, Anil K ^a   Goel, Rakesh K ^b  

^a Berkeley   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISPLACEMENT; DUCTILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0035245371     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1586166     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Concrete Institute (ACI), 1995, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-95) and commentary (ACI 318R-95), Farmington Hills, MI.
2. Chopra, A. K., 1995, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
3. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., 1999, Capacity-demand-diagrarn methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, April.
4. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., 2000, Evaluation of a NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF system, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126 (4), 482-490.
5. Iwan, W. D. and Gates, N. C., 1979, The effective period and damping of a class of hysteretic structures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7(3), 199-212.
6. Jennings, P. C., 1968, Equivalent viscous damping for yielding structures, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 94 (EM1), 103-116.
7. nd International Workshop on the Seismic Design of Bridges, Queenstown, New Zealand, 1, 138-163.
8. Krawinkler, H., and Nassar, A. A., 1992, Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities, Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, Eds., Elsevier Applied Science, New York.
9. MacGregor, J. G., 1997, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ, 485-486.
10. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V. V., 1994, Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design, Earthquake Spectra, 10(2), 357-379.
11. Moehle, J. P., 1992, Displacement-based design of R/C structures subjected to earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra, 8(3), 403-427.
12. Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J., 1982, Earthquake Spectra and Design, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA.
13. Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G M., 1996, Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
14. Priestley, M.J.N. and Calvi, G. M., 1997, Concepts and procedures for direct displacement-based design, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Fajfar and Krawinkler (eds.), Balkema, Rotterdam, 171-181.
15. Riddell, R., Hidalgo, P., Cruz, E., 1989, Response modification factors for earthquake resistant design of short period buildings, Earthquake Spectra, 5(3), 571-590.
16. Shibata, A. and Sozen, M. A., 1976, Substitute structure method for seismic design in R/C, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 102(ST1), 1-18.
17. Tso, W. K. and Naumoski, N., 1991, Period-dependent seismic force reduction factors for short-period structures, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(4), 568-574.
18. nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, 2, 895-912.
19. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M., 1994, Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23(5), 507-521.