Auditorily-induced illusory self-motion: A review

Brain Research Reviews

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 240-255

  Väljamäe, Aleksander ^a,b  

^a Laboratory for Synthetic Perceptive   (Spain)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Auditory motion; Cognitive acoustics; Illusory self motion; Multisensory perception; Spatial sound; Vection; Virtual auditory display

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; BODY POSTURE; COGNITION; COMMUNITY; ERGONOMICS; HEARING; HUMAN; NYSTAGMUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOUND; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 70349509848     PISSN: 01650173     EISSN: 18726321     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.07.001     Document Type: Review

References (146)

1. Agaeva M.Y., and Altman Y.A. Effect of a sound stimulus on postural reactions. Hum. Physiol. 31 5 (2005) 511-514 Translated from Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 31(5), 21-25
2. Agaeva M.Y., Altman Y.A., and Kirillova I.Y. Effects of a sound source moving in a vertical plane on postural responses in humans. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 36 7 (2006) 773-780
3. Algazi V.R., Duda R.O., Thompson D.M., and Avendano C. The CIPIC HRTF database. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (2001), New Platz, NY, USA 99-102
4. Altman Y.A., Varyagina O.V., Gurfinkel V.S., and Levik Y.S. The Effects of moving sound images on postural responses and the head rotation illusion in humans. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 35 1 (2005) 103-106 Translated from Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 89(6), 756-761
5. Aoki M., Thilo K.V., Burchill P., Golding J.F., and Gresty M.A. Autonomic response to real versus illusory motion (vection). Clinic. Auton. Res. 10 (2000) 23-28
6. Ashmead D.H., Wall R.S., Ebinger K.A., Eaton S.B., Snook-Hill M.M., and Yang X. Spatial hearing in children with visual disabilities. Perception 27 (1998) 105-122
7. Baumgarte F., and Faller C. Binaural cue coding - Part I: Psychoacoustic fundamentals and design principles. IEEE Trans. Speech and Audio Process. 11 6 (2003) 509-519
8. Baumgartner T., Valko L., Esslen M., and Jäncke L. Neural correlate of spatial presence in an arousing and noninteractive virtual reality: an EEG and psychophysiology study. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 9 1 (2006) 30-45
9. Begault D.R. 3D Sound for Virtual Reality and Multimedia (1994), Academic Press, New York
10. Bensel C.K., Dzendolet E., and Meiselman J.L. Body sway during long term standing and as affected by pure tones. Perceptual Psychophysiology 4 (1968) 171-174
11. Best V., van Schaik A., and Carlile S. Separation of concurrent broadband sound sources by human listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (2004) 324-336
12. Blauert J. Spatial Hearing. Rev. ed. (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
13. Brandt T., Dichgans J., and Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Exp. Brain Res. 16 (1973) 476-491
14. Brandt T., Bartenstein P., Janek A., and Dieterich M. Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction: visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex. Brain 121 (1998) 1749-1758
15. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis: the Perceptual Organization of Sound (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
16. Bremmer F. Navigation in space: the role of the macaque ventral intraparietal area. J. Physiol. 566 1 (2005) 29-35
17. Bronkhorst W., and Houtgast T. Auditory distance perception in rooms. Nature 397 (1999) 517-520
18. Bronstein A.M., and Buckwell D. Automatic control of postural sway by visual motion parallax. Exp. Brain Res. 113 (1997) 243-248
19. Carlile S., and Best C. Discrimination of sound velocity in human listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 (2002) 1026-1035
20. Cheung B., Hofer K., Heskin R., and Smith A. Physiological and behavioral responses to an exposure of pitch illusion in the simulator. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75 8 (2004) 657-665
21. Chiari L., Dozza M., Cappello A., Horak F.B., Macellari V., and Giansanti D. Audio-biofeedback for balance improvement: an accelerometry-based system. IEEE Transactions on Biomeical Engineering 52 12 (2005) 2108-2111
22. Clark B., and Graybiel A. The localization: the audiogyral illusion. J. Psychol. 28 (1949) 235-244
23. Cohen B., and Raphan T. The physiology of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Springer Handb. Audit. Res. 19 (2004) 235-285
24. Cullen J.K., Collins M., Dobie T.H., and Rappold P.W. The effects of perceived motion on sound-source lateralization. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 63 (1992) 498-504
25. Deutschländer A., Bense S., Stephan T., Schwaiger M., Dieterich M., and Brandt T. Rollvection versus linearvection: comparison of brain activations in PET. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21 (2004) 143-153
26. Dichgans J., and Brandt T. Visual-vestibular interaction: effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R., Leibowitz H.W., and Teuber H.L. (Eds). Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. VIII: Perception (1978), Springer Verlag, Berlin 755-804
27. Dieterich M., Bense S., Stephan T., Yousry T.A., and Brandt T. fMRI signal increases and decreases in cortical areas during small-field optokinetic stimulation and central fixation. Exp. Brain Res. 148 (2003) 117-127
28. DiZio P., Held R., Lackner J.R., Shinn-Cunningham B., and Durlach N. Gravitoinertial force magnitude and direction influence head-centric auditory localization. J. Neurophysiol. 85 (2001) 2455-2460
29. Dodge R. Five types of eye movement in the horizontal meridian plane of the field of regard. Am. J. Physiol. 8 (1903) 307-329
30. Dodge R. Thresholds of rotation. J. Exp. Psychol. 6 (1923) 107-137
31. Durlach N., Allen G., Darken R., Garnett R.L., Loomis J., and Templeman J. Virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial behavior: toward a comprehensive research agenda. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 9 (2000) 593-614
32. Easton D.R., Greene A.J., DiZio P., and Lackner J.R. Auditory cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and congenitally blind people. Exp. Brain Res. 118 (1998) 541-550
33. Fiebig E., Schaefer K.P., and Süss K.J. Form and accuracy of voluntary Ocular tracking movements in response to sinusoidally moving acoustic targets. J. Neurol. 226 2 (1981) 1432-1459
34. Fukui T., Kimura T., Kadota K., Shimojo S., and Gomi H. Odd sensation induced by moving-phantom which triggers subconscious motor program. PLoS ONE 4 6 (2009) e5782 10.1371/journal.pone.0005782
35. Ganz H., and Mattern B. Studies on audiokinetic eye movements. II. Audiokinetics and directional hearing tests. Z. Laryngol. Rhinol. Otol. ihre Grenzgeb. 48 10 (1969) 763-780 (in German). [Untersuchungen über audiokinetische augenbewegungen]
36. Gardner W., and Martin K. HRTF measurements of a KEMAR. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 (1995) 3907-3908
37. Gaver W.W. How do we hear in the world? Explorations in ecological acoustics. Ecol. Psychol. 5 (1993) 285-313
38. Gekhman B.I. Audiokinetic nystagmus. Sens. Sist. 5 2 (1991) 71-78 (in Russian)
39. Ghazanfar A.A., and Schroeder C.E. Is neocortex essentially multisensory?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 6 (2006) 278-285
40. Grantham D.W. Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79 (1986) 1939-1949
41. Gray R., and Regan D. Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Curr. Biol. 10 10 (2000) 587-590
42. Graybiel A., and Niven J.I. The effect of a change in direction of resultant force on sound localization: the audiogravic illusion. J. Exp. Psychol. 42 (1951) 227-230
43. Graziano M.S., and Cooke D.F. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 845-859
44. Guerraz M., Thilo K.V., Bronstein A.M., and Gresty M.A. Influence of action and expectation on visual control of posture. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 11 (2001) 259-266
45. Guldin W.O., and Grüsser O.J. Is there a vestibular cortex?. Trends Neurosci. 21 (1998) 254-259
46. Hall D.A., and Moore D.R. Auditory neuroscience: the salience of looming sounds. Curr. Biol. 13 3 (2003) R91-R93
47. Hall C.R., Pongrac J., and Buckolz E. The measurement of imagery ability. Hum. Mov. Sci. 4 (1985) 107-118
48. Hendrix C., and Barfield W. The sense of presence within auditory virtual environments. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 5 3 (1996) 290-301
49. Hennebert P.E. Audiokinetic nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngolica 51 (1960) 412-415 (in French)
50. Hettinger L.J. Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In: Stanney K.M. (Ed). Handbook of Virtual Environments (2002), NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum 471-492
51. Hill E.W., and Ponder P. Orientation and Mobility Techniques: a Guide for the Practitioner (1976), American Foundation for the Blind, New York
52. Ijsselsteijn W., de Ridder H., Freeman J., Avons S.E., and Bouwhuis D. Effects of stereoscopic presentation, image motion, and screen size on subjective and objective corroborative measures of presence. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 (2001) 298-311
53. Ishizaki H., Pyykko I., Aalto H., and Starck J. Tullio phenomenon and postural stability: experimental study in normal and patients with vertigo. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 100 (1991) 976-983
54. Jürgens R., Nasios G., and Becker W. Vestibular, optokinetic, and cognitive contribution to the guidance of passive self-rotation toward instructed targets. Exp. Brain Res. 151 (2003) 90-107
55. Kapralos B., Zikovitz D., Jenkin M., and Harris L.R. Auditory cues in the perception of self-motion. Proceedings of the 116th AES Convention, Berlin, Germany, 2004. J. Audio Eng. Soc. (Abstracts) 52 (2004) 801-802
56. Kitagawa N., and Ichihara S. Hearing visual motion in depth. Nature 416 (2002) 172-174
57. Kleiner M., Dalenbäck B.I., and Svensson P. Auralization: an overview. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 41 11 (1993) 861-875
58. Kobayashi K., Fushiki H., Asai M., and Watanabe Y. Head and body sway in response to vertical visual stimulation. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 125 8 (2005) 858-862
59. Lackner J.R. Induction of illusory self-rotation and nystagmus by a rotating sound-field. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 48 2 (1977) 129-131
60. Lackner J.R. Some mechanisms underlying sensory and postural stability in man. In: Held R., Leibowitz H.W., and Teuber H.L. (Eds). Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. VIII: Perception (1978), Springer Verlag, Berlin 805-845
61. Lackner J.R. The influence of posture on the spatial localization of sound. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 31 (1983) 650-661
62. Larsson P., Västfjäll D., and Kleiner M. Perception of self-motion and presence in auditory virtual environments. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Workshop of Presence, Valencia, Spain (2004) 252-258 2004
63. Lee D.N. Getting around with light or sound. In: Warren R., and Wertheim A.H. (Eds). Perception and Control of Self-motion: Resources for Ecol. Psychol. (1990), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum 487-505
64. Lewald J., and Karnath H.O. Sound lateralization during passive whole-body rotation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13 (2001) 2268-2272
65. Lewald J., and Karnath H.O. The effect of whole-body tilt on sound lateralization. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16 (2002) 761-766
66. Lewald J., Karnath H.O., and Ehrenstein W.H. Neck-proprioceptive influence on auditory lateralization. Exp. Brain Res. 125 (1999) 389-396
67. Lewald J., Wienemann M., and Boroojerdi B. Shift in sound localization induced by rTMS of the posterior parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia 42 (2004) 1598-1607
68. Lombard M., and Ditton T. At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 3 2 (1997). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html Retrieved August 9, 2007 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
69. Loomis J.M., Golledge R.G., and Klatzky R.L. Navigation system for the blind: auditory display modes and guidance. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 7 (1998) 193-203
70. Lutfi R.A., and Wang W. Correlated analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 2 (1999) 919-928
71. Lyons T.J., Gillinghan K.K., and Teas D.C. The effect of acoustic orientation cues on instrumental performance in a fight simulator. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 61 (1990) 699-706 1990
72. Maier J.X., Neuhoff J.G., Logothetis N.K., and Ghazanfar A.A. Multisensory integration of looming signals by rhesus monkeys. Neuron 43 (2004) 177-181
73. Marme-Karelse A.M., and Bles W. Circular vection and human posture, II. Does the auditory system play a role?. Agressologie 18 6 (1977) 329-333
74. Martens W.L. The importance of perceived self-motion in experiencing convincing virtual acoustic rendering. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 2514 (2004)
75. McBeath M.K., and Neuhoff J.G. The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9 2 (2002) 306-313
76. McFarland W.H., and Weber B.A. An investigation of ocular response to various forms of sound field auditory stimulation. J. Aud. Res. 9 3 (1969) 236-239
77. Mergner T., and Becker W. Perception of horizontal self-rotation: multisensory and cognitive aspects. In: Warren R., and Wertheim A.H. (Eds). Perception and Control of Self-motion: Resources for Ecol. Psychol. (1990), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum 219-263
78. Morita S., and Tokuno S. Visualizing sound flow on orchestra performance. IEIC Technical Report 102 533 (2002) 25-32 (in Japanese)
79. Nakamura H., Ueki N., Tanaka T., and Ifukube T. Influence of light or sound stimulation on the perception of rotatory motion. Technical report of The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, HIP96 46 (1997) 43-48 (In Japanese)
80. Neetz A., Süss K.L., and Schaeffer K.P. Influence of moving acoustic sound sources on body balance. Pfluegers Arch. Suppl. 384 (1980) R24
81. Neuhoff J.G. An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion. Ecol. Psychol. 13 2 (2001) 87-110
82. Neuhoff J.G. Twist and shout: audible facing angles and dynamic rotation. Ecol. Psychol. 15 4 (2003) 335-351
83. Neuhoff J.G. Ecological psychoacoustics: introduction and history. In: Neuhoff J.G. (Ed). Ecological Psychoacoustics (2004), Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam; Boston 1-13
84. Neuhoff J.G., Planisek R., and Seifritz E. Adaptive sex differences in auditory motion perception: looming sounds are special. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35 1 (2009) 225-234
85. Nishiike S., Nakagawa S., Tonoike M., Takeda N., and Kubo T. Information processing of visually-induced apparent self motion in the cortex of humans: analysis with magnetoencephalography. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 121 S545 (2001) 113-115
86. Oe H., Kandori A., Murakami M., Miyashita K., Tsukada K., and Naritomi H. Cortical functional abnormality assessed by auditory-evoked magnetic fields and therapeutic approach in patients with chronic dizziness. Brain Res. 957 2 (2002) 373-381
87. Otake R., Kashio A., Sato T., and Suzuki M. The effect of optokinetic stimulation on orientation of sound lateralization. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 126 (2006) 718-723
88. Parker D.E., Tubbs R.L., and Littlefield V.M. Visual-field displacements in human beings evoked by acoustical transients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63 (1978) 1912-1918
89. Perrott D.R. Concurrent minimum audible angle: a reexamination of the concept of auditory spatial acuity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75 (1984) 1201-1206
90. Petersen H., Magnusson M., Johansson R., Åkesson M., and Fransson P.-A. Acoustic cues and postural control. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 27 (1995) 99-104
91. Petersen H., Magnusson M., Johansson R., and Fransson P.-A. Auditory feedback regulation of perturbed stance in stroke patients. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 28 (1996) 217-223
92. Pettorossi V.E., Brosch M., Panichi R., Botti F., Grassi S., and Troiani D. Contribution of self-motion perception to acoustic target localization. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 125 (2005) 524-528
93. Popper A.N., and Fay R.R. Evolution of the ear and hearing: issues and questions. Brain Behav. Evol. 50 (1997) 213-221
94. Potard G., and Burnett I. A study on sound source apparent shape and wideness. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD'03), Boston, MA, USA, 2003 (2003) 25-28
95. Probst T., Krafczyk S., Brandt T., and Wist E. Interaction between perceived self-motion and object motion impairs vehicle guidance. Science 225 (1984) 536-538
96. Prothero, J. D. (1998). The role of rest frames in vection, presence and motion sickness. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, USA, 1998).
97. Raper S.A., and Soames R.W. The influence of stationary auditory fields on postural sway behaviour in man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 63 (1991) 363-367
98. Rees G., Frith C.D., and Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278 (1997) 1616-1619
99. Reschke M.F., and Parker D.E. Stimulation of the vestibular apparatus in the guinea pig by static pressure changes: head and eye movements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48 (1970) 913-923
100. Riecke B.E., Schulte-Pelkum J., Avraamides M.N., von der Heyde M., and Bülthoff H.H. Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 3 3 (2006) 194-216
101. Riecke B.E., Feuereissen D., and Rieser J.J. Auditory self-motion illusions ("circular vection") can be facilitated by vibrations and the potential for actual motion. In: Creem-Regehr S.H., and Myszkowski K. (Eds). Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV 08) (2008), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 147-154
102. Riecke B.E., Väljamäe A., and Schulte-Pelkum J. Moving sounds enhance the visually-induced self-motion illusion (circular vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions of Applied Perception 6 2 (2009)
103. Rodionov V., Zislin J., and Elidan J. Imagination of body rotation can induce eye movements. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 124 6 (2004) 684-689
104. Rosenblum L.D., Carello C., and Pastore R.E. Relative effectiveness of three stimulus variables for locating a moving sound source. Perception 16 (1987) 175-186
105. Rosenblum L.D., Wuestefeld A.P., and Anderson K.L. Auditory reachability: an affordance approach to the perception of sound source distance. Ecol. Psychol. 8 1 (1996) 1-24
106. Rosenblum L.D., Gordon M.S., and Jarquin L. Echolocating distance by moving and stationary listeners. Ecol. Psychol. 12 3 (2000) 181-206
107. Saberi K., and Perrott D.R. Minimum audible movement angles as a function of sound source trajectory. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 (1990) 2639-2644
108. Sakamoto S., Osada Y., Suzuki Y., and Gyoba J. The effects of linearly moving sound images on self-motion perception. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 25 1 (2004) 100-102
109. Sakamoto S., Suzuki F., Suzuki Y., and Gyoba J. The effect of linearly moving sound image on perceived self-motion with vestibular information. J. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 29 6 (2008) 391-393
110. Sakellari V., and Soames R.W. Auditory and visual interactions in postural stabilization. Ergonomics 39 4 (1996) 634-648
111. Schaefer K.P., Süss K.J., and Fiebig E. Acoustic-induced eye movements. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 374 (1981) 674-688
112. Schinauer T., Hellmann A., and Höger R. Dynamic acoustical stimulation affects self-motion perception. In: Schick A. (Ed). Contributions to Psychological Acoustics. Results of the 6th Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics, 1993 (1993), Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg 373-385
113. Schlack A., Sterbing S., Hartung K., Hoffmann K.P., and Bremmer F. Multisensory space representations in the macaque ventral intraparietal area. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 4616-4625
114. Shaw B.K., McGowan R.S., and Turvey M.T. An acoustic variable specifying time to contact. Ecol. Psychol. 3 (1991) 253-261
115. Sheykholeslami K., and Kaga K. The otolithic organ as a receptor of vestibular hearing revealed by vestibular-evoked myogenic. Hear. Res. 165 (2002) 62-67
116. Shinn-Cunningham B.G., Ihlefeld A., Satyavarta E.L., and Larsson E. Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 91 (2005) 967-979
117. Slater M., and Usoh M. Body centred interaction in immersive Virtual Environments. In: Thalmann N.M., and Thalmann D. (Eds). Artificial Life and Virtual Reality (1994), John Wiley and Sons 125-148
118. Soames R.W., and Raper S.A. The influence of moving auditory fields on postural sway behaviour in man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 65 (1992) 241-245
119. Soto-Faraco S., Kingstone A., and Spence C. Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion. Neuropsychologia 41 13 (2003) 1847-1862
120. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., Lloyd D., and Kingstone A. Moving multisensory research along: motion perception across sensory modalities. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences 13 1 (2004) 29-32
121. Speigle J.M., and Loomis J.M. Auditory distance perception by translating observers. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality, New York, 1993 (1993) 92-99
122. Stephan T., Deutschländer A., Nolte A., Schneider E., Wiesmann M., Brandt T., et al. Functional MRI of galvanic vestibular stimulation with alternating currents at different frequencies. Neuroimage 26 (2005) 721-731
123. Stoffregen T.A., and Bardy B.G. On specification and the senses. Behav. Brain Sci. 24 (2001) 195-261
124. Stoffregen T.A., and Pittenger J.B. Human echolocation as a basic form of perception and action. Ecol. Psychol. 7 (1995) 181-216
125. Stoffregen T.A., Villard S., Kim C., Ito K., and Bardy B.G. Coupling of head and body movement with motion of the audible environment. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 35 4 (2009) 1221-1231
126. Tanaka T., Kojima S., Tokeda H., Ino S., and Ifukube T. The influence of moving auditory stimuli on standing balance in healthy young adults and the elderly. Ergonomics 44 15 (2001) 1403-1412
127. Teramoto W., Watanabe H., Umemura H., Matsuoka K., and Kita S. Judgment biases of temporal order during apparent self-motion. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E87-D 6 (2004) 1466-1476
128. Thurlow W.R., and Kerr T.P. Effect of a moving visual environment on localization of sound. Am. J. Psychol. 83 (1970) 112-118
129. Tokumaru O., Kaida K., Ashida H., Yoneda I., and Tatsuno I. EEG topographical analysis of spatial disorientation. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 70 3 (1999) 256-263
130. Usher, J., & Martens, W. L. (2007). Perceived naturalness of speech sounds presented using personalized versus non-personalized HRTFs. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Auditory Display, Montréal, Canada, June 26-29.
131. Urbantschitsch V. Über Störungen des Gleichgewichtes und Scheinbewegungen [On disturbances of the equilibrium and illusory motions]. Z. Ohrenheilkd. 31 (1897) 234-294
132. Väljamäe A., and Soto-Faraco S. Filling-in visual motion with sounds. Acta Psychol. 129 2 (2008) 249-254
133. Väljamäe A., Larsson P., Västfjäll D., and Kleiner M. Auditory presence, individualized head-related transfer functions, and illusory ego-motion in virtual environments. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Workshop on Presence, Valencia, Spain, 2004 (2004) 141-147
134. Väljamäe, A., Larsson, P., Västfjäll, D., & Kleiner, M. (2005). Traveling without moving: auditory scene cues for translational self-motion. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Auditory Display, ICAD'05, Limerick, Ireland, 2005.
135. Väljamäe A., Larsson P., Västfjäll D., and Kleiner M. Vibrotactile enhancement of auditorily-induced self-motion and presence. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 54 10 (2006) 954-963
136. Väljamäe A., Larsson P., Västfjäll D., and Kleiner M. Sound representing self-motion in virtual environments enhances linear vection. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17 1 (2008) 43-56
137. Väljamäe A., Larsson P., Västfjäll D., and Kleiner M. Auditory landmarks enhance circular vection in multimodal virtual reality. J. Acoust. Eng. Soc. 57 3 (2009) 111-120
138. Warren J.D., Zielinski B.A., Green G.R., Rauschecker J.P., and Griffiths T.D. Perception of sound source motion by the human brain. Neuron 34 (2002) 139-148
139. Watson J.E. Evaluation of audiokinetique nystagmus as a test of auditory sensitivity. J. Aud. Res. 8 (1968) 161-165
140. Weber B.A., and Millburn W.O. The effects of a rhythmically moving auditory stimulus on eye movements in normal young adults. J. Aud. Res. 7 (1967) 259-266
141. Wertheim A.H. Motion perception during self-motion: the direct versus inferential controversy revisited. Behav. Brain Sci. 17 2 (1994) 293-355
142. Wiest G., Amorim M.A., Mayer D., Schick S., Deecke L., and Lang W. Cortical responses to object-motion and visually-induced self-motion perception. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 12 (2001) 167-170
143. Wright W.G., DiZio P., and Lackner J.R. Perceived self-motion in two visual contexts: dissociable mechanisms underlie perception. Journal of Vestibular Research 16 (2006) 23-28
144. Yardley L., Gardner M., Lavie N., and Gresty M. Attentional demands of perception of passive self-motion in darkness. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 1293-1301
145. Zalewski P. Audiokinetic reactions. Otolaryngol. Pol. 30 3 (1976) 235-239 (in Polish)
146. Zajonc R.B. Emotions. In: Gilbert D.T., Fiske S.T., and Lindzey G. (Eds). Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed. (1998), Oxford University Press, New York 591-632 Vol. 1