Auditory self-motion illusions ("circular vection") can be facilitated by vibrations and the potential for actual motion

APGV 2008 - Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 147-154

  Riecke, Bernhard E ^a,b   Feuereissen, Daniel ^a   Rieser, John J ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory vection; Circular vection; Cue integration; Higher level cognitive influences; Human factors; Psychophysics; Self motion illusions; Self motion simulation; Vibrations; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PHYSICS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUALIZATION;

AUDITORY VECTION; CIRCULAR VECTION; CUE-INTEGRATION; HIGHER-LEVEL/COGNITIVE INFLUENCES; HUMAN FACTORS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SELF-MOTION ILLUSIONS; SELF-MOTION SIMULATION; VIBRATIONS;

VIBRATORS;

EID: 63049131477     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1394281.1394309     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J., AND BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. 1985. Induced selfmotion in central vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 11, 2, 122-132.
2. BERTHOZ, A., PAVARD, B., AND YOUNG, L. R. 1975. Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) - basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions. Exp. Brain Res. 23, 5, 471-489.
3. BLES, W. 1981. Stepping around: circular vection and coriolis effects. Attention and performance, 47-61.
4. COHEN, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. DICHGANS, J., AND BRANDT, T. 1978. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In Perception, R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber, Eds., vol. VIII of Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer, 756-804.
6. DODGE, R. 1923. Thresholds of rotation. J. Exp. Psychol. 6, 107-137.
7. ERNST, M. O., AND BANKS, M. S. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 (Jan.), 429-433.
8. ERNST, M. O., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2004. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 4 (Apr.), 162-169.
9. FEUEREISSEN, D. 2008. VR: Getting the Reality Part Straight - Does Jitter and Suspension of the Human Body Increase Auditory Circular Vection? Bachelor's thesis, Department of Computer Science in Media, Furtwangen University, Germany. Available: http://webuser.fhfurtwangen. de/~fetzner/spacestudies/uploads/uploads/vr-vection-t1.pdf.
10. GEKHMAN, B. 1991. Audiokinetic nystagmus. Sensornye Sistemy 5, 2, 71-78. (in Russion).
11. HENNEBERT, P. E. 1960. Audiokinetic nystagmus. Journal of Auditory Research 1, 1, 84-87.
12. HETTINGER, L. J. 2002. Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In Handbook of Virtual Environments, K. M. Stanney, E . Lawrence Erlbaum, ch. 23, 471-492.
13. KHASNIS, A., AND GOKULA, R. M. 2003. Romberg's test. J Postgrad Med 49, 2, 169-172. Available: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text. asp?2003/49/2/169/894.
14. LACKNER, J. R. 1977. Induction of illusory self-rotation and nystagmus by a rotating sound-field. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 48, 2, 129-131.
15. LARSSON, P., VA ̈STFJA ̈LL, D., AND KLEINER, M. 2004. Perception of self-motion and presence in auditory virtual environments. In Proceedings of 7th Annual Workshop of Presence, 252-258. Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2953.
16. LEPECQ, J. C., GIANNOPULU, I., AND BAUDONNIERE, P. M. 1995. Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children. Perception 24, 4, 435-449.
17. MACH, E. 1875. Grundlinien der Lehre von der Bewegungsempfindung. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
18. MARMEKARELSE, A. M., AND BLES, W. 1977. Circular vection and human posture ii: Does the auditory-system play a role. Agressologie 18, 6, 329-333.
19. MERGNER, T., AND BECKER, W. 1990. Perception of horizontal self-rotation: Multisensory and cognitive aspects. In Perception&Control of Self-Motion, R. Warren and A. H. Wertheim, Eds. Erlbaum, New Jersey, London, 219-263.
20. PALMISANO, S., GILLAM, B. J., AND BLACKBURN, S. G. 2000. Global-perspective jitter improves vection in central vision. Perception 29, 1, 57-67.
21. PALMISANO, S., BURKE, D., AND ALLISON, R. S. 2003. Coherent perspective jitter induces visual illusions of self- motion. Perception 32, 1, 97-110.
22. PAVARD, B., AND BERTHOZ, A. 1977. Linear acceleration modifies perceived velocity of a moving visual scene. Perception 6, 5, 529-540.
23. RIECKE, B. E., SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., CANIARD, F., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2005. Influence of Auditory Cues on the visually-induced Self-Motion Illusion (Circular Vection) in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of 8th Annual Workshop Presence 2005, 49-57.
24. RIECKE, B. E., SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., CANIARD, F., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2005. Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2005, 131-138.
25. RIECKE, B. E., VA ̈STFJA ̈LL, D., LARSSON, P., AND SCHULTEPELKUM, J. 2005. Top-down and multi-modal influences on self-motion perception in virtual reality. In Proceedings of HCI international 2005, 1-10.
26. RIECKE, B. E., VON DER HEYDE, M., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2005. Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2, 3, 183-215.
27. RIECKE, B. E., SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., AVRAAMIDES, M. N., VON DER HEYDE, M., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2006. Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 3, 3, 194-216.
28. RIECKE, B. E., SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., AND CANIARD, F. 2006. Visually induced linear vection is enhanced by small physical accelerations. In 7th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF). Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication. html?publ=3901.
29. RIECKE, B. E., VA ̈LJAMA ̈E, A., AND SCHULTE-PELKUM, J. 2008. Moving Sounds Enhance the Visually-Induced Self- Motion Illusion (Circular Vection) in Virtual Reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. (accepted).
30. RIECKE, B. E., FEUEREISSEN, D., AND RIESER, J. J. 2008. Contribution and interaction of auditory and biomechanical cues for self-motion illusions ("circular vection"). In Proceedings of CyberWalk workshop. Available: http://www.kyb.mpg.de/publication. html?publ=5043.
31. SAKAMOTO, S., OSADA, Y., SUZUKI, Y., AND GYOBA, J. 2004. The effects of linearly moving sound images on selfmotion perception. Acoustical Science and Technology 25, 100-102.
32. SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., AND RIECKE, B. E. 2008. An integrative approach to presence and self-motion perception research. In Immersed in Media Experiences: Presence Psychology andm Design (Handbook of Presence). Lawrence Erlbaum. in print.
33. SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., RIECKE, B. E., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2004. Vibrational cues enhance believability of ego-motion simulation. In International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF). Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2766.
34. SCHULTE-PELKUM, J. 2008. Perception of self-motion: Vection experiments in multi-sensory Virtual Environments. PhD thesis, Ruhr-UniversitA t Bochum. (submitted).
35. VA ̈LJAMA ̈E, A., LARSSON, P., VA ̈STFJA ̈LL, D., AND KLEINER, M. 2004. Auditory presence, individualized head-related transfer functions, and illusory ego-motion in virtual environments. In Proceedings of 7th Annual Workshop of Presence, 141-147.
36. VA ̈LJAMA ̈E, A., LARSSON, P., VA ̈STFJA ̈LL, D., AND KLEINER, M. 2006. Vibrotactile enhancement of auditory induced selfmotion and spatial presence. Journal of the Acoustic Engineering Society 54, 10, 954-963.
37. VON HELMHOLTZ, H. 1867. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Voss, Leipzig.
38. VÄLJAMÄE, A. 2005. Self-motion and presence in the perceptual optimization of a multisensory virtual reality environment. Licentiate dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. Available: http://lab5.ta.chalmers.se/∼sasha/ Aleksander-Valjamae- Licentiate.pdf.
39. VA ̈LJAMA ̈E, A. 2007. Sound for Multisensory Motion Simulators. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
40. WARREN, R., AND WERTHEIM, A. H., Eds. 1990. Perception&Control of Self-Motion. Erlbaum, New Jersey, London.
41. WONG, S. C. P., AND FROST, B. J. 1981. The effect of visualvestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation. Perception&Psychophysics 30, 3, 228-236.
42. WRIGHT, W. G., DIZIO, P., AND LACKNER, J. R. 2006. Perceived self-motion in two visual contexts: dissociable mechanisms underlie perception. J Vestib Res 16, 1-2, 23-28.