ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOACOUSTICS: INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY

Ecological Psychoacoustics

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 1-13

  Neuhoff, John G ^a  

^a 931 College Mall   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139717770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9780080477442_004     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Arterberry, M. E., & Bomstein, M. H. (2002). Infant perceptual and conceptual categorization: The roles of static and dynamic stimulus attributes. Cognition, 86(1), 1-24.
2. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Canevet, G., & Scharf, B. (1990). The loudness of sounds that increase and decrease continuously in level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2136-2142.
4. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray.
5. Fechner, G. (1966). Elements of psychophysics (vol.l). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Iverson, P. (1995). Auditory stream segregation by musical timbre: Effects of static and dynamic acoustic attributes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21(4), 751-763.
7. Kleiss, J. A. (1995). Visual scene properties relevant for simulating low-altitude flight: A multidimensional scaling approach. Human Factors, 37(4), 711-734.
8. Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
9. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. W. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264, 746-748.
10. Menier, C., Forget, R, & Lambert, J. (1996). Evaluation of two-point discrimination in children: Reliability, effects of passive displacement and voluntary movement. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 523-537.
11. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
12. Muise, J. G., LeBlanc, R S., Blanchard, L. C., & de Wamaffe, A. (1993). Discrimination of the shape of the masked inducing figure perception of the illusory triangle. Perception, 22, 623-628.
13. Neuhoff, J. G., & McBeath, M. K. (1996). The Doppler illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 970-985.
14. Perrott, D. R, & Musicant, A. D. (1981). Dynamic minimum audible angle: Binaural spatial acuity with moving sound sources. Journal of Auditory Research, 21, 287-295.
15. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
16. Plomp, R (1999). Fifty years in (psycho) acoustics: Some conclusions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1238.
17. Rochat, P., & Wraga, M. (1997). An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 199-212.
18. Rosenblum, L. D., & Fowler, C. A. (1991). Audiovisual investigation of the loudness effort effect for speech and nonspeech events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 976-985.
19. SchmuckIer, M. A. (2001). What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy 2, 419-436.
20. Schubert, E. D. (1978). History of research on hearing. In E. Carterette and M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (vol. 4, pp. 40-80). New York: Academic Press.
21. Spillmann, L., & Kurtenbach, A. (1992). Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading. Vision Research, 32, 1941-1946.
22. Spitzer, M. W., & Semple, M. N. (1993). Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to time-varying interaural phase disparity: Effects of shifting the locus of virtual motion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1245-1263.
23. Stevens, S. S., & Davis, H. (1938). Hearing: Its psychology and physiology. Oxford, England: Wiley.
24. Verstraten, F. A. J., Fredericksen, R. E., Van Wezel, R J. A., Lankheet, M. J. M., & Van de Grind, W. A. (1996). Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: Evidence for two mechanisms. Vision Research, 36, 421-424.
25. Wever, E. G., & Bray, C. W. (1936a). Hearing in the pigeon as studied by the electrical responses of the inner ear. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 22, 353-363.
26. Wever, E. G., & Bray, C. W. (1936b). The nature of bone conduction as shown by the electrical response of the cochlea. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 45, 822-830.
27. Wever, E. G., & Bray, C. W. (1937). A comparative study of the electrical responses of the ear. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 407-410.