Consequences of late breeding on moult and recovery rate of a long-distance migrant, the Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe);Auswirkung von Spätbruten auf Mauser und Rückkehrrate bei einem Weitstreckenzieher, dem Steinschmätzer (Oenanthe oenanthe)

Vogelwarte

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 125-133

  Buchmann, Martin ^a   Helm, Barbara ^b   Rothery, Peter ^c   Flinks, Heiner ^a  

^a Unterer Sand 12 ^*  (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^c CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL COMMUNITY; BREEDING POPULATION; CLIMATE EFFECT; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MALE BEHAVIOR; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; MIGRATORY SPECIES; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SEASONALITY;

OENANTHE (AVES); OENANTHE OENANTHE;

EID: 70349481840     PISSN: 00496650     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Brooke M1979: Differences in the quality of territories held by Wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe). J. Anim. Ecol. 48:21-32.
2. Buchmann M 2001: Die Brutbiologie des Steinschmätzers (Oenanthe oenanthe) auf intensiv genutzten Flächen in Rheinland-Pfalz. Vogelwarte 41:1-17.
3. Burnham KP & Anderson DR1998: Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
4. ClarkeA,SaetherB-E&RoskaftE1997:Sexbiasesinaviandispersal: areappraisal.Oikos79:429-438.(Pubitemid27268896)
5. Conder P 1989: The Wheatear. Christopher Helm, London.
6. Daan S, Dijkstra C, Drent R & Meijer T1989: Food supply and the annual timing of avian reproduction. In: Quellet H (Hrsg) Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici,Vol I: 392-407. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa.
7. Dawson A 2003: A detailed analysis of primary feather moult in the Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris - new feather mass increases at a constant rate. Ibis 145: 69-76.
8. DawsonA&NewtonI2004: Useandvalidationofamoltscoreindexcorrectedforprimary-feathermass.Auk121:372-379. (Pubitemid38740295)
9. Dawson A, Hinsley S, Ferns P, Bonser R & Eccleston L 2000: Rate of moult affects feather quality: a mechanism linking current reproductive effort to future survival. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:2093-2098.
10. Flinks H & Kolb H 1997: Veränderungen der Körpermasse adulter Schwarzkehlchen Saxicola torquata in Beziehung zum Brut- und Mauserstatus. Vogelwelt 118:1-10.
11. Flinks H, Helm B & Rothery P 2008: Plasticity of moult and breeding schedules in migratory European Stonechats Saxicola rubicola. Ibis 150: 687-697.
12. Forstmeier W, Kuijper D & Leisler B 2001: Polygyny in the Dusky Warbler, Phylloscopus fuscatus: the importance of female qualities. Anim. Behav. 62:1097-1108.
13. Foster MS 1974: A model to explain moult-breeding overlap and clutch size in some tropical birds. Evolution 28: 182190.
14. Ginn HB & Melville DS 1983: Moult in birds. BTO Guide 19. Tring.
15. Greenwood P & Harvey P 1982: The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13:1-21.
16. Gwinner E 1986: Circannual rhythms. Endogenous annual clocks in the organization of seasonal processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
17. HahnT,SwingleJ,WingfieldJ&RamenofskyM1992: Adjustmentsoftheprebasicmoultscheduleinbirds.OmisScandinavica23:314-321. (Pubitemid23403737)
18. HallS&FranssonT2000: LesserWhitethroatsundertimeconstraintmoultmorerapidlyandgrowshorterwingfeathers. J.AvianBiol.31:583-587.(Pubitemid32119688)
19. Hemborg C 1999: Sexual difference in the timing of moult and female reproductive costs in pied flycatchers. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 429-436.
20. Hemborg C & Lundberg A 1998: Costs of overlapping reproduction and moult in passerine birds: an experiment with the pied flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43:19-23.
21. Hemborg C & Merilä J 1998: A sexual conflict in collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis: early male moult reduces female fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 2003-2007.
22. Jenni L & Winkler R1994: Moult and ageing of European Passerines. Academic Press, London, San Diego, New York.
23. Johannesen E, Houston D & Russell J 2003: Increased survival and breeding performance of double breeders in little penguins Eudyptula minor, New Zealand: evidence for individual bird quality? J. Avian Biol. 34:198-210.
24. Kjellén N 1994: Moult in relation to migration in birds - a review. Ornis Svecica 4:1-24.
25. Lebreton J-D, Burnham K, Clobert J & Anderson D 1992: Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62:67-118.
26. Lind J 2001: Escape flight in moulting Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus). Funct. Ecol. 15: 29-35.
27. Morton G & Morton M 1990: Dynamics of postnuptial moult in free-living mountain white-crowned sparrows. Condor 92: 813-828.
28. Newton I 1966: The moult of the Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula. Ibis 108,41-67.
29. Newton I (Hrsg) 1989: Lifetime reproduction in birds. Academic Press, London.
30. Newton I & Rothery P 2000: Timing and duration of moult in the Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula: an appraisal of different analytical procedures. Ibis 142: 65-74.
31. nd International Ornithological Congress, Durban: 224-247. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg.
32. Nilsson J-A & Svensson E 1996: The cost of reproduction: a new link between current reproductive effort and future reproductive success. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 711-714.
33. nd International Ornithological Congress: 544-563. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg.
34. Orell M & Ojanen M 1980: Overlap between breeding and moulting in the Great Tit Parus major and the Willow Tit P. montanus in northern Finland. Ornis Scandinavica 11: 43-49.
35. Payne RB 1972: Mechanisms and control of moult. In: Farner DS & King JR (Hrsg) Avian biology. Vol.II. Academic Press, New York.
36. Sanz J 1999: Seasonal variation in reproductive success and post-nuptial moult of Blue Tits in southern Europe: an experimental study. Oecologia 121: 377-382.
37. Serra L 2001: Duration of primary moult affects primary quality in Grey Plovers Pluvialis squatarola. J. Avian Biol. 32: 377-380.
38. SiikamäkiP1998: Limitationofreproductivesuccessbyfood availabilityandbreedingtimeinPiedFlycatchers.Ecology79:1789-1796. (Pubitemid28382450)
39. Siikamäki P, Hovi M & Rätti O 1994: A trade-off between current reproduction and moult in the Pied Flycatcher - an experiment. Funct. Ecol. 8: 587-593.
40. nd International Ornithological Cogress, Durban 2622-2638. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg.
41. SlagsvoldT&DaleS1996:Disappearanceoffemalepiedflycatchersinrelation- breedingstageandexperimentallyinducedmoult.Ecology77:461-471.(Pubitemid27350343)
42. SnowD W1969: The moult of British thrushes and chats. Bird Study 16:115-129.
43. Summers R, Swann R & Nicoll M 1983: The effects of methods on estimates of primary moult duration in the Redshank Tringa totanus. Bird Study 30:149-156.
44. Suter W 1988: Oenanthe oenanthe.- In: Glutz von Blotzheim UN & Bauer (Hrsg), Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, 11. Aula, Wiesbaden.
45. th ed. Rosersberg, Stockholm.
46. SvenssonE&NilssonJ-A1997:Thetrade-offbetweenmoultandparentalcare: asexualconflictintheBlueTit?Behav.Ecol.8:92-98.(Pubitemid27119014)
47. Underhill L 2003: Within ten feathers: primary moult strategies of migratory waders (Charadrii) In: Berthold P, Gwinner E & Sonnenschein E (Hrsg) Avian migration: 187-197. Springer, Heidelberg.
48. Underhill LG & Zucchini W 1988: A model for avian primary moult. Ibis 130: 358-372.
49. Underhill LG & Joubert A 1995: Relative masses of primary feathers. Ringing Migration 16:109-116.
50. Underhill LG, Zucchini W & Summers R 1990: A model for avian primary moult-data types based on migration strategies and an example using Redshank Tringa totanus. Ibis 132:118-121.
51. van Noordwijk AJ & de Jong G 1986: Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Naturalist 128:137-142.
52. Williamson K 1957: The annual post-nuptial moult in the Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe). Bird Banding 28: 129135.